HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2201  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 7:08 PM
Joseph Potvin Joseph Potvin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Canada's National Capital Region
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by OtrainUser View Post
Your behavior proves that especially the lawsuits that are either launched or caused by MOOSE
Lawsuit? What lawsuit?

What you have described doesn't sound like the rather mundane requests we've initiated with the regulator for compliance with a long-standing statute and one of the most important sections of Canada's Constitution (i.e 92(10)). MOOSE is not even a party to the City's Appeal -- that's between two levels of government.

Even our Section 40 request to the Minister just asks him to remove ambiguity for an existing order.

Joseph Potvin
Director General | Directeur général
Moose Consortium (Mobility Ottawa-Outaouais: Systems & Enterprises) | www.letsgomoose.com
Consortium Moose (Mobilité Outaouais-Ottawa: Systèmes & Enterprises) | www.onyvamoose.com
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2202  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 7:16 PM
Joseph Potvin Joseph Potvin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Canada's National Capital Region
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by OtrainUser View Post
Wrong again, Truenorth is against commuter rail accelerating exurban sprawl which will have a negative effect on the city of Ottawa
Is @Truenorth00 equivalently against commuter automobiles accelerating exurban sprawl which will have a negative effect on the city of Ottawa?

Has @Truenorth00 cited any empirical data or studies to support his stance?

Joseph Potvin
Director General | Directeur général
Moose Consortium (Mobility Ottawa-Outaouais: Systems & Enterprises) | www.letsgomoose.com
Consortium Moose (Mobilité Outaouais-Ottawa: Systèmes & Enterprises) | www.onyvamoose.com
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2203  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 7:41 PM
Charles5 Charles5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Potvin View Post
Lawsuit? What lawsuit?
...rather mundane requests...
Yes, perhaps technically they weren't 'lawsuits'.

But if I could provide a quote:

"Moose Consortium successfully pursued legal action to protect railways and bridges... The Consortium is currently pursuing legal steps required to prevent destruction of the railway..."

Joseph Potvin, the Low-Down, March 16-22, 2016


In fact, there's a tab on the MOOSE website labelled "LEGAL", and the title of the webpage is "Moose Consortium Inc. Legal Action to Protect Essential Railways in Canada's Capital"


And while MOOSE may have not been the appellant in No.550-17-009793-173, Cour supérieur du Québec, District de Gatineau. Tim Kehoe v.Municipalité de Chelsea, "Moose did provide an affidavit in support of the appellant"

And, since @OtrainUser did include "caused by MOOSE", one could argue that Federal Court of Appeal, Number 18-A-14, CITY OF OTTAWA v. CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, could be included as well, as without the multiple complaints from MOOSE to the CTA it's most likely this wouldn't be happening right now.

Last edited by Charles5; Jan 7, 2019 at 10:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2204  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 9:59 PM
pattherat pattherat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Potvin View Post
@Truenorth00 is against private sector entrepreneurial transit and instead insist on state monopolies
@pattherat speaks of knowing what the people want

It seems like others may be more inspired by Marxism, whether they know it or not, than the guy (and team) organizing a 100% commercial venture on competitive free market principles. FWIW it might be useful to scan through Milton Friedmans' "Capitalism and Freedom" and see what he suggests about the role of government in a free society.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism_and_Freedom

Joseph Potvin
Director General | Directeur général
Moose Consortium (Mobility Ottawa-Outaouais: Systems & Enterprises) | www.letsgomoose.com
Consortium Moose (Mobilité Outaouais-Ottawa: Systèmes & Enterprises) | www.onyvamoose.com
Yeah that is what my post was insinuating

Perhaps a ‘free market’ thinker such as yourself can understand supply and demand. If your ideas are so wonderful, where is the demand for more information, updates, and urgency for your solution from your targeted market? People should be clamouring for this right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2205  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 10:35 PM
Joseph Potvin Joseph Potvin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Canada's National Capital Region
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by pattherat View Post
Perhaps a ‘free market’ thinker such as yourself can understand supply and demand. If your ideas are so wonderful, where is the demand for more information, updates, and urgency for your solution from your targeted market? People should be clamouring for this right?
No, because we're not selling anything to people in general. We'll be selling train service to a few dozen property investors throughout the 400 km system. It's B2B, not B2C or B2G. They sell to people and to commercial clients that sell to people. So MOOSE is two or more steps removed from the purchasing clients that you speak of.

Yes our target market has expressed interest.

And yes, the NCC planners (the closest thing to public sector market with a suitable mandate) like our concept, though since it's a private sector initiative they won't be making any commitments. You can ask them at public events, though, if MOOSE's plan seems consistent with their vision.

Joseph Potvin
Director General | Directeur général
Moose Consortium (Mobility Ottawa-Outaouais: Systems & Enterprises) | www.letsgomoose.com
Consortium Moose (Mobilité Outaouais-Ottawa: Systèmes & Enterprises) | www.onyvamoose.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2206  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 10:49 PM
Joseph Potvin Joseph Potvin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Canada's National Capital Region
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles5 View Post
without the multiple complaints from MOOSE to the CTA it's most likely this wouldn't be happening right now.
Yes, astonishing isn't it!

What sort of hockey game is it where the referees sit on the bench while there's a bust-up on the ice? Really, should the spectators have to file formal written "complaints" to the NHL just to get the referees to blow their whistles and issue penalties and misconducts?

Here, read the letter from another Mayor from this region.

Joseph Potvin
Director General | Directeur général
Moose Consortium (Mobility Ottawa-Outaouais: Systems & Enterprises) | www.letsgomoose.com
Consortium Moose (Mobilité Outaouais-Ottawa: Systèmes & Enterprises) | www.onyvamoose.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2207  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 11:01 PM
Charles5 Charles5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Potvin View Post
Since you bring up Smiths Falls. Council's support was contingent on the fact that the "economic development officer will be able to review the finer points of the plan, before making any firm commitments."... "If all goes according to plan the system would be ready by 2017"

Perhaps you could enlighten us on the results of that review.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2208  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 11:06 PM
Joseph Potvin Joseph Potvin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Canada's National Capital Region
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles5 View Post
Since you bring up Smiths Falls. ... Perhaps you could enlighten us on the results of that review.
Go ahead and ask them. (You shouldn't ask me to speak for them.)

Joseph Potvin
Director General | Directeur général
Moose Consortium (Mobility Ottawa-Outaouais: Systems & Enterprises) | www.letsgomoose.com
Consortium Moose (Mobilité Outaouais-Ottawa: Systèmes & Enterprises) | www.onyvamoose.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2209  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 12:27 AM
OtrainUser OtrainUser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Potvin View Post
Is @Truenorth00 equivalently against commuter automobiles accelerating exurban sprawl which will have a negative effect on the city of Ottawa?

Has @Truenorth00 cited any empirical data or studies to support his stance?

Joseph Potvin
Director General | Directeur général
Moose Consortium (Mobility Ottawa-Outaouais: Systems & Enterprises) | www.letsgomoose.com
Consortium Moose (Mobilité Outaouais-Ottawa: Systèmes & Enterprises) | www.onyvamoose.com
[email protected]

Ottawa's downtown traffic problems come from the suburbs like Kanata, Barrhaven and Orleans and Gatineau not the exurbs and those are being addressed by LRT which has local support and funding. Even Google maps can show that traffic from exurbs is not that big of a problem as you make it out to be and since a bunch of them are already serviced by VIA Rail who is working on HFR will ultimatly eliminate a need for your service.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2210  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 1:48 AM
Joseph Potvin Joseph Potvin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Canada's National Capital Region
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by OtrainUser View Post
traffic from exurbs is not that big of a problem as you make it out to be
Please point to any of our documents or our website where we declared traffic from surrounding towns to be a big problem. Well, those exurbs are taking many thousands of parking spots each day downtown and in park'n rides that are paid for by Ottawa taxpayers. That's a problem, but it's been Ottawa councillors beefing about that, not MOOSE.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OtrainUser View Post
since a bunch of them are already serviced by VIA Rail who is working on HFR will ultimatly eliminate a need for your service.
If you can spare a few minutes, please check on the VIA site for the price of taking the train from, Smiths Falls to Tremblay Rd, or say from just Fallowfield to Tremblay Rd, and report back the community here. Then add in the fare for getting on OC-Transpo's service to get downtown and back.

Let's say from your home neighbourhood you got a job with Tweed/Canopy's medical marijuana plant in Smiths Falls. Since you are against sprawl and pro-transit, you'll take OC-Transpo and VIA. Let us know your estimated time and cost. They start work there at 8 am.

Say you instead got a cool career-advancing job at Fortress Global Enterprises over in Thurso. They start work at 8 am too. Would you drive or turn down the job?

Joseph Potvin
Director General | Directeur général
Moose Consortium (Mobility Ottawa-Outaouais: Systems & Enterprises) | www.letsgomoose.com
Consortium Moose (Mobilité Outaouais-Ottawa: Systèmes & Enterprises) | www.onyvamoose.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2211  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 1:58 AM
OtrainUser OtrainUser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Potvin View Post
Please point to any of our documents or our website where we declared traffic from surrounding towns to be a big problem. Well, those exurbs are taking many thousands of parking spots each day downtown and in park'n rides that are paid for by Ottawa taxpayers. That's a problem, but it's been Ottawa councillors beefing about that, not MOOSE.



If you can spare a few minutes, please check on the VIA site for the price of taking the train from, Smiths Falls to Tremblay Rd, or say from just Fallowfield to Tremblay Rd, and report back the community here. Then add in the fare for getting on OC-Transpo's service to get downtown and back.

Let's say from your home neighbourhood you got a job with Tweed/Canopy's medical marijuana plant in Smiths Falls. Since you are against sprawl and pro-transit, you'll take OC-Transpo and VIA. Let us know your estimated time and cost. They start work there at 8 am.

Say you instead got a cool career-advancing job at Fortress Global Enterprises over in Thurso. They start work at 8 am too. Would you drive or turn down the job?

Joseph Potvin
Director General | Directeur général
Moose Consortium (Mobility Ottawa-Outaouais: Systems & Enterprises) | www.letsgomoose.com
Consortium Moose (Mobilité Outaouais-Ottawa: Systèmes & Enterprises) | www.onyvamoose.com

Based on my own personal experience I would always look for a job near where I live and if it was in another city then I would move closer to where the job is and yes I do practice what I say. If people want to live in a low dense area that doesn't have transit options that's their choice and they shouldn't expect to be rewarded for making poor decisions. Thier is still lots of affordable options for housing in Ottawa compared to Toronto so there is no excuse for not living closer to downtown unless the job is elswhere. Basically my point is people should be living closer to where they work it would make transit decisions easier to make.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2212  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 2:05 AM
OCCheetos OCCheetos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by OtrainUser View Post
Ottawa's downtown traffic problems come from the suburbs like Kanata, Barrhaven and Orleans and Gatineau not the exurbs and those are being addressed by LRT which has local support and funding. Even Google maps can show that traffic from exurbs is not that big of a problem as you make it out to be and since a bunch of them are already serviced by VIA Rail who is working on HFR will ultimatly eliminate a need for your service.
I don't think he was referring strictly to traffic. If he were, I don't think Google Maps would be a good indicator for exurb traffic. Sure the streets out there may be clear, but they do eventually feed into the inner city's streets and contribute to the problem.

The idea that VIA's HFR plan will eliminate the need for regional or commuter rail is wrong.

First of all VIA doesn't serve the majority of the communities MOOSE is targeting.

Second of all VIA provides an entirely different type of service from what MOOSE is proposing. For example, with or without HFR, VIA is not about to displace GO from the GTA (such as on the eastern lakeshore) because they're fundamentally different types of service. On a similar line of thought, if there's already a VIA station at Fallowfield, why should we bother extending LRT to Barrhaven? You should know the answer to that.

In this area VIA has stations at Smiths Falls, Fallowfield, Ottawa, Casselman, and Alexandria. But what about Richmond, or South Barrhaven, or Vars, or Limoges, or Maxville, or a half dozen other potential station locations just on those lines? Those are stations that would be required in order to produce an effective commuter/regional rail system and is not something VIA is in the business to service. If you think with HFR it'd be as simple as VIA adding some basic stations at those locations then I don't think you fully understand what VIA is proposing with HFR or what VIA's purpose is.

The idea of using VIA trains for commuter service into Ottawa has been floated before and one of the issues noted is that VIA's ticketing system doesn't lend itself particularly well to commuter use, and neither do their trains. Apparently there was an arrangement between GO and VIA to allow GO passengers to ride VIA trains for a slightly higher fare, although I don't know if this still exists but my overall point is, if VIA's services aren't designed to provide this kind of service in any way, why would you not prefer a service that is actually built around providing regional and commuter services?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2213  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 2:26 AM
Charles5 Charles5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Potvin View Post
Go ahead and ask them. (You shouldn't ask me to speak for them.)
You were more than willing to share the letter from the Mayor. I can only assume that if there was a positive report out there that you were aware of you would have been more than willing to share it as well. In fact, it would probably be posted on your website by now.

I'll try and do a little digging and see if I can find something.

Edit: Request sent to "[email protected]" for a copy of any review that may have been completed. I'll let folks know if I receive anything.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2214  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 2:35 AM
OtrainUser OtrainUser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 619
Quote:
Originally Posted by OCCheetos View Post
I don't think he was referring strictly to traffic. If he were, I don't think Google Maps would be a good indicator for exurb traffic. Sure the streets out there may be clear, but they do eventually feed into the inner city's streets and contribute to the problem.

The idea that VIA's HFR plan will eliminate the need for regional or commuter rail is wrong.

First of all VIA doesn't serve the majority of the communities MOOSE is targeting.

Second of all VIA provides an entirely different type of service from what MOOSE is proposing. For example, with or without HFR, VIA is not about to displace GO from the GTA (such as on the eastern lakeshore) because they're fundamentally different types of service. On a similar line of thought, if there's already a VIA station at Fallowfield, why should we bother extending LRT to Barrhaven? You should know the answer to that.

In this area VIA has stations at Smiths Falls, Fallowfield, Ottawa, Casselman, and Alexandria. But what about Richmond, or South Barrhaven, or Vars, or Limoges, or Maxville, or a half dozen other potential station locations just on those lines? Those are stations that would be required in order to produce an effective commuter/regional rail system and is not something VIA is in the business to service. If you think with HFR it'd be as simple as VIA adding some basic stations at those locations then I don't think you fully understand what VIA is proposing with HFR or what VIA's purpose is.

The idea of using VIA trains for commuter service into Ottawa has been floated before and one of the issues noted is that VIA's ticketing system doesn't lend itself particularly well to commuter use, and neither do their trains. Apparently there was an arrangement between GO and VIA to allow GO passengers to ride VIA trains for a slightly higher fare, although I don't know if this still exists but my overall point is, if VIA's services aren't designed to provide this kind of service in any way, why would you not prefer a service that is actually built around providing regional and commuter services?
I know VIA provides intercity service but the rails from Alexandria to Smiths Falls is all owned by VIA while the rails in the GTA are either owned by GO or CN Rail so you are making an apples to Oranges comaparison. With HFR Via can have hourly trains going through Alexandria and Smiths falls while the trains head to Toronto via Ottawa, VIA's plans are more advanced than MOOSE since they have already ordered trains to upgrade their fleet while MOOSE has done nothing since they started except cause legal headaches. Trust me those communities along the VIA corridor will get better service once HFR get approved so they have no need for MOOSE.

As for the traffic comment i found this on MOOSE's website

Reduce automobile traffic by at least 25,000 vehicles per day on arterial roads and downtown parking lots.

So this basically assumes there is a traffic problem from the exurbs which is really not true since it would show up on google maps if there was a problem.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2215  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 2:43 AM
Charles5 Charles5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Potvin View Post
Say you instead got a cool career-advancing job at Fortress Global Enterprises over in Thurso. They start work at 8 am too. Would you drive or turn down the job?
Well, using Google maps it looks like it would be a 1 hour drive from my home in Barrhaven to Thurso. From my previous calculations in regards to the proposed commuter train it would take me 2 hours each way just considering train speed and stops along the way. Driving therefore saves me two hours of commuting time every day. so I'm sure I would drive there.

Now, I live about 2km away from the tracks in Barrhaven so I haven't even taken into account how I would get to the train station, be that by OC Transpo (thus paying a fare for a short trip, dealing with transfer times, etc) or driving there and having to pay for parking. I also haven't taken into account any transfer times between the two different MOOSE lines that I would have to use. Considering that they are only running every hour it would be very challenging to make transfers efficient for folks going in various directions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2216  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 3:00 AM
Joseph Potvin Joseph Potvin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Canada's National Capital Region
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles5 View Post
Driving therefore saves me two hours of commuting time every day. so I'm sure I would drive there.
and

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles5 View Post
I also haven't taken into account any transfer times between the two different MOOSE lines that I would have to use. Considering that they are only running every hour it would be very challenging to make transfers efficient for folks going in various directions.
Okay, then suppose MOOSE stations and trains were really comfortable places to get work or reading or whatever done, so that travel time is mostly useful time. You'd still drive?

Maybe even sell your car and sign up with Vrtucar.

Joseph Potvin
Director General | Directeur général
Moose Consortium (Mobility Ottawa-Outaouais: Systems & Enterprises) | www.letsgomoose.com
Consortium Moose (Mobilité Outaouais-Ottawa: Systèmes & Enterprises) | www.onyvamoose.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2217  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 3:11 AM
OCCheetos OCCheetos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by OtrainUser View Post
I know VIA provides intercity service but the rails from Alexandria to Smiths Falls is all owned by VIA while the rails in the GTA are either owned by GO or CN Rail so you are making an apples to Oranges comaparison.
I think you missed the point. There's a fundamental difference between regional/commuter services and intercity services regardless of who's on whose tracks.

Quote:
With HFR Via can have hourly trains going through Alexandria and Smiths falls while the trains head to Toronto via Ottawa, VIA's plans are more advanced than MOOSE since they have already ordered trains to upgrade their fleet while MOOSE has done nothing since they started except cause legal headaches.
Those trains won't really be any better suited for commuter rail service than the existing fleet.

Quote:
Trust me those communities along the VIA corridor will get better service once HFR get approved so they have no need for MOOSE.
"Trust" you? Why? Again I think you've failed to understand why stations don't already exist in those locations and why they won't under VIA. There's a reason why VIA only has a station in Oshawa and nowhere else along the lakeshore in the GTA.

Quote:
As for the traffic comment i found this on MOOSE's website

Reduce automobile traffic by at least 25,000 vehicles per day on arterial roads and downtown parking lots.

So this basically assumes there is a traffic problem from the exurbs which is really not true since it would show up on google maps if there was a problem.
Well if you sell houses to 25000 (or less if you count the existing populations) in the exurbs you create a traffic problem, one that can be solved with rail service.

It's a weak argument that's been mentioned before but in any case providing rail service can help ensure that traffic from the exurbs doesn't ever become an issue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2218  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 7:56 AM
Charles5 Charles5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Potvin View Post
Okay, then suppose MOOSE stations and trains were really comfortable places to get work or reading or whatever done, so that travel time is mostly useful time. You'd still drive?
Absolutely! Assume another 15 minutes commute plus transfer time from OC Transpo to the train station at both ends. Add to that an average of 30 minutes transfer time between the two rail ines (trains that run every hour on two separate lines will always have a 30 minute average transfer time. Optimizing for transfers from one line to the other will always lead to an equally longer transfers in the opposite direction). For the commute both to and from Thurso that adds another hour and a half.

Admittedly, rush hour traffic will slow me down as well. So for the person living in Barrhaven and working in Thurso, that leaves them with the option of either spending 3 hours on the road driving to and from work, or 5 1/2+ hours using the train every day.

The reality is that most people wouldn't take that job, or would move closer if they really wanted the job. But since you provided the scenario, I'm certain almost everyone would chose the car over the train in order to save themselves 2 1/2+ hours a day, every day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2219  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 8:54 AM
OtrainUser OtrainUser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 619
Quote:
Originally Posted by OCCheetos View Post
I think you missed the point. There's a fundamental difference between regional/commuter services and intercity services regardless of who's on whose tracks.
No i didn't miss the point there are a number of towns that MOOSE wants to serve that can be easily served by VIA rail since they have stations there now already. Those towns can be served better with HFR from VIA.


Quote:
Originally Posted by OCCheetos View Post
Those trains won't really be any better suited for commuter rail service than the existing fleet.
Proof???


Quote:
Originally Posted by OCCheetos View Post
"Trust" you? Why? Again I think you've failed to understand why stations don't already exist in those locations and why they won't under VIA. There's a reason why VIA only has a station in Oshawa and nowhere else along the lakeshore in the GTA.
You are asking us to trust MOOSE who has no experience as a rail company since they have yet to prove themselves which is why no invester has taken an interest in them. Again those stations in the GTA were already served by GO and before that CN's former commuter service in the GTA which is why you only have 1 VIA station in Oshawa but that is not what i'm talking about, VIA already has the stations in eastern Ontario going all the way to Smith's falls SO THE VIA STATIONS ARE ALREADY THERE and thats what I'm talking about.


Quote:
Originally Posted by OCCheetos View Post
Well if you sell houses to 25000 (or less if you count the existing populations) in the exurbs you create a traffic problem, one that can be solved with rail service.

It's a weak argument that's been mentioned before but in any case providing rail service can help ensure that traffic from the exurbs doesn't ever become an issue.
Again the current populations in those Exurbs don't justify rail service, their populations need to be at least 100,000 people and thats per town. Orleans and Kanata for stage 2 and 3 will be just getting LRT and those populations are over 100,000 people.

Last edited by OtrainUser; Jan 8, 2019 at 9:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2220  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 1:21 PM
OCCheetos OCCheetos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by OtrainUser View Post
No i didn't miss the point there are a number of towns that MOOSE wants to serve that can be easily served by VIA rail since they have stations there now already. Those towns can be served better with HFR from VIA.
VIA's primary service target is long distance travelers (i.e. Ottawa to Toronto, or Kingston, or Montreal) not short distance travelers between Ottawa and places like Richmond or Vars... You might get some overlap in service from places that are further out like Smiths Falls and Alexandria but as it is today the large majority of passengers travelling on VIA are travelling further out than that.

One of the selling points of HFR (IIRC) is an increased number of trains travelling between "major hubs" with no stops in between to allow for faster travel times between large cities. So if there are hourly VIA trains between Ottawa and Toronto and you think that they'll all stop a those little stops along the way, then you're wrong. Anyone taking those trains from say, Toronto, won't be happy that their trips are being slowed down to serve those extra stops either.

Quote:
Proof???
They're designed for longer distance travel that don't have stops every 2-5km like a regional system has. They don't have automatic doors and the configuration of each car is not well designed for loading and unloading passengers efficiently. They're great for comfort (which is great on long distance trips) but otherwise they're lacking for commuter rail.

Quote:
You are asking us to trust MOOSE who has no experience as a rail company since they have yet to prove themselves which is why no invester has taken an interest in them. Again those stations in the GTA were already served by GO and before that CN's former commuter service in the GTA which is why you only have 1 VIA station in Oshawa but that is not what i'm talking about, VIA already has the stations in eastern Ontario going all the way to Smith's falls SO THE VIA STATIONS ARE ALREADY THERE and thats what I'm talking about.
It doesn't matter if it's MOOSE or some other "more trustworthy" organization (like idk, GO) setting up a commuter rail system. It does not make sense to ask VIA to take a major hit to their efficiency to provide a service that they clearly don't have an interest in and that they clearly aren't designed to provide.
They have 5 stations in Eastern Ontario which doesn't even cover half the places I listed or that are possible. If these regions are going to be served by rail, it should be a regional rail provider who does so, not VIA.

On top of that it also doesn't address the other 20-30 stops that MOOSE wants to target such as Arnprior, Wakefield, anything east of Gatineau, North Kanata, etc.

I don't know why it's so hard for you to get the difference between long distance rail and regional rail and why it isn't a bad thing to have overlapping rail lines with one providing the long distance service (that doesn't stop everywhere in between) and on providing the regional service (that does stop everywhere in between). VIA is set up exclusively to provide the latter service and has shown no interest in providing the latter because they leave it to other railways such as GO or exo to provide instead.

Quote:
Again the current populations in those Exurbs don't justify rail service, their populations need to be at least 100,000 people and thats per town. Orleans and Kanata for stage 2 and 3 will be just getting LRT and those populations are over 100,000 people.
Hence the unconventional business model.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:30 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.