HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11001  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2019, 12:42 PM
boomtown's Avatar
boomtown boomtown is offline
Google Steffen Thomas
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Live in Candler Park - Work in Midtown
Posts: 495
Interesting news...
Emory has acquired the Peachtree Pine building
https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news...meless.html?iana=hpmvp_atl_news_headline
__________________
Are you ready for some construction?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11002  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2019, 2:54 PM
Street Advocate Street Advocate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by boomtown View Post
Interesting news...
Emory has acquired the Peachtree Pine building
https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news...meless.html?iana=hpmvp_atl_news_headline
Interesting read from the article. Sounds like we may have a few proposals move forward from Emory this year, both this (looking to retain integrity of the building if structurally sound, but considering an academic, incubator, and potentially medical purposes), as well as the the cancer institute tower at Linden. They also sound confident the Stitch is progressing. I'm hesitant when it comes to Emory, but hopefully they pull off some nice projects for the area. IMO, they should try to replicate the activation of GT's Tech Square. Per the article, they're more than aware of Tech Square's success.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11003  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2019, 6:53 PM
West Peachtree West Peachtree is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Advocate View Post
Interesting read from the article. Sounds like we may have a few proposals move forward from Emory this year, both this (looking to retain integrity of the building if structurally sound, but considering an academic, incubator, and potentially medical purposes), as well as the the cancer institute tower at Linden. They also sound confident the Stitch is progressing. I'm hesitant when it comes to Emory, but hopefully they pull off some nice projects for the area. IMO, they should try to replicate the activation of GT's Tech Square. Per the article, they're more than aware of Tech Square's success.

An update on Tech Square neighbor, The Cheetah...

https://www.bisnow.com/atlanta/news/neig...n=fri-04-jan-2019-000000-0500_atlanta-re
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11004  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2019, 7:30 PM
Verge Verge is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 861
Thanks for Sharing. I think you can see what I mean from the Site Plan included with the petition--
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11005  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2019, 4:07 PM
Street Advocate Street Advocate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,717
NRP Group filed 1015 Boulevard SE (just north of the SE beltline) to be rezoned to MRC 3. https://aca3.accela.com/ATLANTA_GA/Cap/C...gencyCode=ATLANTA_GA&IsToShowInspection=

Hopefully they have an actually engaging development and don’t include an absurd amount of surface parking, which would be a nice contrast with the property being developed to the south of the trail.

1131 Glenwood Ave SE to MRC 1 C would also complement EAV businesses.
https://aca3.accela.com/ATLANTA_GA/Cap/C...gencyCode=ATLANTA_GA&IsToShowInspection=
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11006  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2019, 5:31 PM
jayden jayden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: JERSEY
Posts: 1,600
Would be nice to get an update on 1105 soon!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11007  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2019, 6:29 PM
Atlriser's Avatar
Atlriser Atlriser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlanta - Grant Park
Posts: 1,269
What update is needed? Lead tenant was announced. Land is being cleared currently and vertical construction starting.
__________________
I live in my own little world but it's ok, they know me here!

The next time you are contemplating what the hell went wrong in your life, look in a mirror!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11008  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2019, 7:41 PM
Street Advocate Street Advocate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlriser View Post
What update is needed? Lead tenant was announced. Land is being cleared currently and vertical construction starting.
And 1105 West Peachtree is a sponsor of midtown alliance’s annual event. It’s happening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11009  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2019, 4:33 AM
jaxoncreed jaxoncreed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 20
https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/clayton...uld-soon-come-to-metro-atlanta/898707267

Quote:
Pods that fit four people would ride under a track, traveling above traffic. Stanley said it would cost riders about what they pay for MARTA.

The system offers "what people love about cars but without the negative side effects of cars and what they love about public transit but without all the negatives of public transit,” Stanley said.

Stanley said six municipalities -- Macon-Bibb, College Park, Forest Park, Hapeville and Henry County -- have all signed agreements to install pod tracks. The CEO asked Eagles Landing developer J.T. Williams to be his Atlanta-area representative.

Stanley said Transit X would be privately financed at about $7 million a mile, costing taxpayers and governments nothing.

He said municipalities would actually make 5 percent of gross revenue for the use of their right of ways. Getting local decision makers on board hasn’t taken much convincing so far.

Transit X's short-term goal is to offer nonstop trips from south of the metro to Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport.

The CEO said the driverless, solar-powered, electric pods would be profitable and environmentally friendly. He said it could transform transportation.

The quickest timeline puts Transit X in metro Atlanta by 2020.


It seems like one of those far flung ideas that a junior state senator comes up with. But, I guess since it doesn't cost the taxpayer anything, it's politically possible. The question is can they really do it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11010  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2019, 5:19 AM
sbrptree sbrptree is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaxoncreed View Post
https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/clayton...uld-soon-come-to-metro-atlanta/898707267





It seems like one of those far flung ideas that a junior state senator comes up with. But, I guess since it doesn't cost the taxpayer anything, it's politically possible. The question is can they really do it?
This is FAR FLUNG. Public govt would have to authorize to build in public right of way. Who will build and maintain? What about overhead power lines, traffic signal poles and cables etc. Liability for accidents? etc. We'll see autonomous cars before any of these foolish ideas ever leave the computer screen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11011  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2019, 4:33 PM
Street Advocate Street Advocate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,717
The beltline reroute is well underway at 725 Ponce

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11012  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 5:34 AM
GlobalResNativAtlant GlobalResNativAtlant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by sbrptree View Post
This is FAR FLUNG. Public govt would have to authorize to build in public right of way. Who will build and maintain? What about overhead power lines, traffic signal poles and cables etc. Liability for accidents? etc. We'll see autonomous cars before any of these foolish ideas ever leave the computer screen.
Naysayers like you, do not help us into the march to the future.

This could be the answer we need.

The system is lightweight, needs only 10' wide x 8' high above 7'. Which is as very small ROW compared to any transit system. It takes autonomous vehicles into a reality that would actually help fight congestion, rather than add to it.

And, it would cost much less than any other transit system.

It will take many types of transit to help us get over our car addiction.

I know, I sold all of my cars-- it is not easy, but well worth it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11013  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 6:58 AM
MdtwnATL MdtwnATL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 394
Hmmm my first thought was that there are many times there are "crazies" on the train with me, but at least I'm on a large train car when those people can pretty easily be ignored or where I can move away. Imagine being stuck in a tiny pod with someone. No thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11014  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 3:14 PM
testarossa50 testarossa50 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 837
That will never, ever happen and there's no point wasting any more brain energy on it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11015  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 3:28 PM
montydawg montydawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 911
Quote:
Originally Posted by testarossa50 View Post
That will never, ever happen and there's no point wasting any more brain energy on it.
I watched the video on his website. Unfortunately, there is no test track for what he is trying to accomplish, so I think this is all 'theoretical'. I'm not an engineer, but what I do know is it will be difficult to build in many of the safety systems we take for granted with traditional transit. He claimed this would be over '1000 times' more safe than cars on the road, however, there is no crumple zones or any barrier that would protect passengers if the pods crashed into each other. They hang from the guide track, however, what will prevent heavy winds from blowing the pods from side to side, making traveling uncomfortable? If the wheels are small and round, what will allow the wheels to have enough surface area to allow the pods to stop and accelerate quickly without loosing traction. He claimed that the 'whole system would be powered by solar panels', however, it would be difficult to power one pod with a whole array of solar panels, due to the limited amperage they can produce. He claimed these would travel at high speeds- how would the pods remain stable and not sway back and forth in corners? How would people escape the pods if there were a mechanical breakdown, and a whole group of pods queued up without a station nearby?

Heavy rail has a much higher capacity than this technology to transport people, however, strict safety standards limit this capacity by stipulating that trains cannot travel right behind each other. There is also a concept known as 'queuing theory' that limits the number of individuals that can travel at different speeds (e.g. stopped to board train and traveling speed) on the same guide way that this seems to ignore. I don't see how this is remotely possible outside of some guandala (sp?) type system that is seen at ski resorts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11016  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 3:56 PM
Pemgin Pemgin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 809
Their "proof of concept" was moving an unoccupied pod a few feet in a warehouse. Hard pass
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11017  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 4:17 PM
MARTAisSmarta MARTAisSmarta is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pemgin View Post
Their "proof of concept" was moving an unoccupied pod a few feet in a warehouse. Hard pass
The crazy thing is that apparently we have people in our local governments fawning over this monstrosity, while at the same time trying to effectively ban Bird/Lime scooters.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11018  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 5:13 PM
testarossa50 testarossa50 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by montydawg View Post
I watched the video on his website. Unfortunately, there is no test track for what he is trying to accomplish, so I think this is all 'theoretical'. I'm not an engineer, but what I do know is it will be difficult to build in many of the safety systems we take for granted with traditional transit. He claimed this would be over '1000 times' more safe than cars on the road, however, there is no crumple zones or any barrier that would protect passengers if the pods crashed into each other. They hang from the guide track, however, what will prevent heavy winds from blowing the pods from side to side, making traveling uncomfortable? If the wheels are small and round, what will allow the wheels to have enough surface area to allow the pods to stop and accelerate quickly without loosing traction. He claimed that the 'whole system would be powered by solar panels', however, it would be difficult to power one pod with a whole array of solar panels, due to the limited amperage they can produce. He claimed these would travel at high speeds- how would the pods remain stable and not sway back and forth in corners? How would people escape the pods if there were a mechanical breakdown, and a whole group of pods queued up without a station nearby?

Heavy rail has a much higher capacity than this technology to transport people, however, strict safety standards limit this capacity by stipulating that trains cannot travel right behind each other. There is also a concept known as 'queuing theory' that limits the number of individuals that can travel at different speeds (e.g. stopped to board train and traveling speed) on the same guide way that this seems to ignore. I don't see how this is remotely possible outside of some guandala (sp?) type system that is seen at ski resorts.
Haha, yes, those are precisely the issues that spending further brain energy on this would reveal. Then, in testing, years upon years of learning about new, unanticipated issues and solving each one in sequence. Add to that the fact that the founder apparently has zero anticipation of all of this, which indicates that they're more of a specialist/fanatic in the technology and not someone expert in bringing emerging technologies to market.

Ain't gonna happen. Ever.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11019  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 6:26 PM
Street Advocate Street Advocate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,717
No midtown DRC this month.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11020  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2019, 7:06 PM
Username123 Username123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by MARTAisSmarta View Post
The crazy thing is that apparently we have people in our local governments fawning over this monstrosity, while at the same time trying to effectively ban Bird/Lime scooters.
Do any of the places mentioned in the following quote have Bird or Lime scooters?

“Stanley said six municipalities -- Macon-Bibb, College Park, Forest Park, Hapeville and Henry County -- have all signed agreements to install pod tracks.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:24 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.