Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad
The proposed facility has a $3M capital campaign associated with it.
I think there would be much greater enthusiasm amongst potential donors if it had been a $5M campaign, for a building with a fully enclosed swimming pool in addition to the "splash pad".
Right now, I imagine potential donors will look at what is proposed for the facility and really question whether or not they actually want to contribute. The city and the YMCA may be shooting themselves in the foot here.......
|
Agreed. I'd suggest totally replacing the pad with a full pool...the incremental cost can't be that great (since you're already building the full building structure anyway, land, soft costs, none of that changes).
I have toddlers who love splash pads, but really there are two new pads already in the north end. I don't hear anyone complaining about lack of a year-round splash pad....but I do hear a lot of chatter about difficulty getting kids into swimming lessons.