HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction


270 Park Avenue in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #541  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 1:37 PM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,096
I agree with NYguy about the overabundance of windswept plazas in that area of the city already. What Park Ave needs is lots more retail, not more plazas. What few retail there is are mostly bank branches that are set back from the street behind plazas. Park Ave is one of the most boring-est walk for anyone that doesn't work or live there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #542  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 2:27 PM
citybooster citybooster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 420
Seeing the outdoor plaza design rendering, I have to agree that the idea of a windswept public plaza isn't such a great one compared to an enclosed public space with open views and retail and other needed amenities. We do need an active, vibrant public component especially along places with dead streetscapes like much of Park Avenue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #543  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 6:21 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
Another Google earth overview of the surrounding area...






















__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #544  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 7:36 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #545  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 7:37 PM
PeterQM PeterQM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 351
Here are a few more Google Earth shots added to the story. This thing will be massive and probably taller once Foster finesses all this bulk. Shown is just a bit more than 1,400 feet btw.

JPMorgan Chase Plans Enclosed Public Plaza and Metro-North Access for 1,400-Foot-Tall Headquarter Building





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #546  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 8:14 PM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,096
Please finesse away Norman.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #547  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 8:18 PM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,096
I am rooting for the No-action version.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #548  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 9:26 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterQM View Post
Here are a few more Google Earth shots added to the story. This thing will be massive and probably taller once Foster finesses all this bulk. Shown is just a bit more than 1,400 feet btw.
I don’t think that there will be any finessing. I’m pretty sure that these are essentially the final product.

Both versions look better than 50 HY.

Last edited by JMKeynes; Nov 13, 2018 at 9:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #549  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 10:41 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by antinimby View Post
I am rooting for the No-action version.
That's not gonna happen. It was already determined that the enclosure of the open space would have no adverse impact. But they could end up with a tower of similar height anyway, depending on where they go with the extra air rights.



__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #550  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 12:52 AM
Prezrezc Prezrezc is offline
A.F.K.A. JayPro
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: South Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 851
To give you an idea here:

271P is most likely next to go; so we're looking at something as big as JPM.

The only thing about 245P that could save it is the fact that it was the last of the trio to rise (comp. 1967). Soby virtue of the date, any repurposing/retrofitting would porlly work best here.

Besides, the facade at least has a uniqueness to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #551  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 1:31 AM
streetscaper streetscaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 2,939
__________________
hmmm....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #552  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 2:00 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
What an amazing city!!!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #553  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 2:56 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,295
I’ll just quote this from the city realty article that I found interesting:

Quote:
In a statement, Foster said, “The building design is set to respond to its historic location as well as the heritage of JP Morgan, and we look forward to working with them to realise their vision for a new global headquarters for the company.”
Surely I hope its not soul crushing like other JP towers (Chase tower in Houston or 383 Madison Avenue).

But something that has qualities of some of the historical Park Ave structures would be nice.

I kinda wish Robert A.M. Stern designed this. But we shall see what Foster provides.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #554  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 3:17 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
... But we shall see what Foster provides.
I seriously believe that we have seen the two designs. Either of those (and likely, the 1,400' version) will rise. I'm happy with either. They're nicer than 50 HY, not as fat, and much taller. Foster is a hack, but these will be great towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #555  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 4:20 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
I seriously believe that we have seen the two designs. Either of those (and likely, the 1,400' version) will rise. I'm happy with either. They're nicer than 50 HY, not as fat, and much taller. Foster is a hack, but these will be great towers.
What we have seen is the massing for the tower. The main details of course are what will make the design, but we've seen the basic outline. The only question is the ultimate height. It will be a bulky, massive office tower. But it doesn't overwhelm Vandy too much, and I think they will work well together.



__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #556  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 4:36 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
I’m not sure what details remain to be seen. I believe that the setbacks that are shown are no more nor less than what the final design will have. I highly doubt that there will be a crown since his goal is to emalute the International style.

I think that the proposed towers are nice. KPF would have designed sonething much nicer, but that probably wouldn’t have had the big floorplates that Chase needs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #557  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 2:52 PM
gramsjdg's Avatar
gramsjdg gramsjdg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 759
I'll bet even money this will have a significant (200'+) crown. The massing as is for the 1400' version is too bulky for the location. It needs to be somewhat taller to fit in with the surrounding structures.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #558  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 3:10 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by gramsjdg View Post
I'll bet even money this will have a significant (200'+) crown. The massing as is for the 1400' version is too bulky for the location. It needs to be somewhat taller to fit in with the surrounding structures.
That would be nice, but I doubt that it will occur. Norm seems fixated on designing a 1950s tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #559  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 4:53 PM
patriotizzy's Avatar
patriotizzy patriotizzy is offline
Metal Up Your !
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 1,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
I’m not sure what details remain to be seen.
The facade? The crown? The plaza? Anything that isn't just the massing?
__________________
Making America Great Again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #560  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 5:03 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by patriotizzy View Post
The facade? The crown? The plaza? Anything that isn't just the massing?
The façade, of course, is not represented by the massing, but I don't anticipate Foster's diamonds (or anything unique) on an International-style tower, nor do I expect a crown. It appears that they're going with the non-plaza version -- not that a plaza has any bearing on the architecture.

I'm very confident that we've seen pretty much the final shape of the tower.

It's a lost opportunity, but I'm still very pleased with a 1,400' new tower with an ok design. This "massing model" is a lot nicer than 50 HY.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:38 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.