NYT is reporting that NYC, specifically Long Island City in northwest Queens, is the second of two sites.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgrath618
Honestly? I think everyone on here should feel robbed.
Amazon had specifically stated they wanted to be in a dense urban area with access to public transit, decently affordable living, and a large city culture to go with it.
|
No, they didn't. When the RFP was released, I went through and ranked all the factors mentioned:
https://westnorth.com/2017/09/11/whats-actually-important-in-amazons-hq2-rfp/
Cost of living was mentioned at the very lowest tier ("also, provide information on this"). Ongoing costs of occupancy were of middling importance.
What was of "paramount importance," i.e., highest priority? "Finding suitable buildings/sites." That apparently meant space that could occupied, and expanded, quickly, and filled with qualified employees -- and they chose the metros with the #2 and #3 largest populations of programmers. (Bay Area is #1, Seattle is #4.) And they found either existing, already under construction, or shovel-ready buildings in both NYC and Arlington that fit their expansion timeline. They bought off-the-shelf ready-to-wear from the stores with the biggest selections; they did
not opt for futuristic and transformative and complicated and visionary.
Also, fun fact: Crystal City was built in the 1970s and 1980s as a pioneering example in transit-oriented high-rise development, with direct connections from Metro right into office building lobbies. The federal government moved 30,000 defense and patent office employees out from Crystal City in the 1990s and 2000s. It was possible for tens of thousands of people to take Metro to work there then, and it's possible now.