Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed
I am surprised to see that Miami is still in the discussion. It seems an odd fit compared to what the other cities can offer. But Bezos did spend part of his adolescence there, so maybe it's a sentimental thing.
|
Miami is the “only fish in a reasonably large pond” option.
It’s a pretty big metro with good flight connections, plenty of wealth, and a place that talent could conceivably be attracted to (even though there is no tech industry today). But there is no business there. I can’t even name a company that’s (really) based in Miami outside of tourism and real estate.
So they could be the only game in town, and transform the economy quite significantly themselves, IF their HQ2 ends up being as big and ambitious as they claim it could be.
If HQ2 ends up being 1/4 the size and more of a regional hub than a true second headquarters, then Miami is a terrible choice because there’s no tech industry and that wouldn’t be enough to create one. That ability to change tack must be factoring into their thinking as well.