Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee
It was more than just WEM that killed downtown. The City Centre Airport crushed many plans to develop skyscrapers, resulting in short squat towers here while big shiny towers sprang up in Calgary. The underground LRT construction helped kill much of the street life. NEP recession and the ensuing Ralph Klein era didn't help matters. Need I go on?
|
I'm relatively new to Edmonton's public transport system and the other day, while walking through the tunnels, I was thinking about the same thing. I talked to a guy from Calgary and he said they don't have these tunnels over there. To me they seem like a massive waste of space and money.
What is the point of having 15 different entry and exit points for every station?

The net result is money wasted on heating empty spaces, running escalators, maintenance etc... You're also taking foot traffic away from up top. The smarter thing to do is to build more lines with simple station designs and cheap maintenance bills. The stations in Vancouver (what I'm used to) are literally small glass boxes with a set of escalators on either side, THAT'S IT! Okay, Vancouver has a different climate, but it's miserable in the winter nonetheless. Is it that difficult to put a jacket on when you're leaving the station to walk to your office? haha. The argument for the tunnels make no sense to me.
I'm not even mad about the system being underground. The system should probably be underground (even Vancouver's Skytrain is underground in the core), but the problem are these damn tunnels (which are outdated as fuckkkkk on top btw).
Is the new line being built the same way? With underground cities and 500 different entry and exit points?