HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11821  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2018, 4:17 AM
Rogie's Avatar
Rogie Rogie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 433
Also interesting the sheer number of surface parking lots in the core, even back then.
     
     
  #11822  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2018, 1:02 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
So many buildings I wish were still standing. Sigh.
     
     
  #11823  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2018, 7:27 PM
Doppelganger Doppelganger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 16
^ Others I'm glad that we're rid of, for example the garbage incineration facility in the photo that stood where the Muttart Conservatory stands today.
     
     
  #11824  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2018, 8:51 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,895
The area where the Muttart is now looked so barren.

There's no Shaw Conference Centre
no Westin
no Manulife
no Commerce Place
no Scotia Place
no ECC
no Sutton Place
no Winspear
no Bell
no Canada Place

The James MacDonald Bridge is under construction though.
Plus the Tegler, law court and post office are still around.
     
     
  #11825  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2018, 9:33 PM
Vixx Vixx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Wild Rose Country/Worst Case Ontario
Posts: 398
That photo makes Edmonton look bleak in that time period, yikes.

I wonder sometimes how different downtown would be had it not been for WEM. Many vouch that it single handedly killed the life of downtown for decades and while I don't dispute that the mall had a significant impact, I wonder if downtown would be THAT much more different then it is today. Would there be less surface parking lots? More skyscrapers? Less crummy areas? Not sure what the answer is, but I get the feeling downtown would not be this dense and vibrant urban utopia some out there claim it would have been if not for that mall.
     
     
  #11826  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2018, 10:22 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vixx View Post
That photo makes Edmonton look bleak in that time period, yikes.

I wonder sometimes how different downtown would be had it not been for WEM. Many vouch that it single handedly killed the life of downtown for decades and while I don't dispute that the mall had a significant impact, I wonder if downtown would be THAT much more different then it is today. Would there be less surface parking lots? More skyscrapers? Less crummy areas? Not sure what the answer is, but I get the feeling downtown would not be this dense and vibrant urban utopia some out there claim it would have been if not for that mall.
It's somewhat funny, because while the picture looks bleak, there was far more foot traffic and retail activity around that period. You look at ground level pictures back around then and the sidewalks had far more people. Downtown was the place to go.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #11827  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2018, 10:51 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,895
It was more than just WEM that killed downtown. The City Centre Airport crushed many plans to develop skyscrapers, resulting in short squat towers here while big shiny towers sprang up in Calgary. The underground LRT construction helped kill much of the street life. NEP recession and the ensuing Ralph Klein era didn't help matters. Need I go on?
     
     
  #11828  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2018, 11:14 PM
kcantor kcantor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
It was more than just WEM that killed downtown. The City Centre Airport crushed many plans to develop skyscrapers, resulting in short squat towers here while big shiny towers sprang up in Calgary. The underground LRT construction helped kill much of the street life. NEP recession and the ensuing Ralph Klein era didn't help matters. Need I go on?
the biggest negative was - and remains - neil crawford centre (except for the new super lab and coroner’s office) and thousands of employees spending their work days in isolation.
__________________
"If you did not want much, there was plenty." Harper Lee
     
     
  #11829  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2018, 12:04 AM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,072
What is the opinion of what WEM did for putting Edmonton on the map in the 80s? Was it a net benefit for us even if it took away from downtown? At least we are large enough now to have our cake and eat it too.
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
     
     
  #11830  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2018, 5:57 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_foster View Post
What is the opinion of what WEM did for putting Edmonton on the map in the 80s? Was it a net benefit for us even if it took away from downtown? At least we are large enough now to have our cake and eat it too.
Now there's something I thought I'd never hear about WEM. The rest of the country laughs about it: a city defined by a big suburban mall.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #11831  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2018, 5:59 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
It was more than just WEM that killed downtown. The City Centre Airport crushed many plans to develop skyscrapers, resulting in short squat towers here while big shiny towers sprang up in Calgary. The underground LRT construction helped kill much of the street life. NEP recession and the ensuing Ralph Klein era didn't help matters. Need I go on?
Much of the initial anti-business push that drove oil companies to set up in Calgary can be traced back to when Edmonton gave the thumbs-down to the Husky Tower.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #11832  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2018, 7:28 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Much of the initial anti-business push that drove oil companies to set up in Calgary can be traced back to when Edmonton gave the thumbs-down to the Husky Tower.
Husky Tower was rejected by Edmonton because of the City Centre Airport.
     
     
  #11833  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2018, 8:54 PM
kcantor kcantor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Now there's something I thought I'd never hear about WEM. The rest of the country laughs about it: a city defined by a big suburban mall.
no more than the rest of its country laughs about anaheim for being defined by an amusement park...

edmonton wasn't laughed at because of its malls (and i use the (plural and not the singular because it included kingsway and londonderry and southgate and heritage and eaton centre etc., not just wem). it was envied for having the highest levels of disposable income in the country and for having the best shopping and the best fashion shopping in the country.

edmonton was the test-bed for new concepts and considered an entry point to canada for foreign retailers because of that disposable income and because of the shopping savy, the feeling being that if you could make it in edmonton, you could make it anywhere in the country.

it's also worth nothing that when wem opened, downtown still had an eatons and a woodwards and the original bay as well as scores of independents including a hardware store and a year round indoor farmers' market.
__________________
"If you did not want much, there was plenty." Harper Lee

Last edited by kcantor; Sep 30, 2018 at 9:43 PM.
     
     
  #11834  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2018, 9:38 PM
TimB09 TimB09 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,526
Canuckyeg on c2e posted he/she has heard that Wexford has put out an RFP for their site they bought downtown. 35-40 stories.
     
     
  #11835  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2018, 9:57 PM
Abii Abii is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
It was more than just WEM that killed downtown. The City Centre Airport crushed many plans to develop skyscrapers, resulting in short squat towers here while big shiny towers sprang up in Calgary. The underground LRT construction helped kill much of the street life. NEP recession and the ensuing Ralph Klein era didn't help matters. Need I go on?
I'm relatively new to Edmonton's public transport system and the other day, while walking through the tunnels, I was thinking about the same thing. I talked to a guy from Calgary and he said they don't have these tunnels over there. To me they seem like a massive waste of space and money.

What is the point of having 15 different entry and exit points for every station? The net result is money wasted on heating empty spaces, running escalators, maintenance etc... You're also taking foot traffic away from up top. The smarter thing to do is to build more lines with simple station designs and cheap maintenance bills. The stations in Vancouver (what I'm used to) are literally small glass boxes with a set of escalators on either side, THAT'S IT! Okay, Vancouver has a different climate, but it's miserable in the winter nonetheless. Is it that difficult to put a jacket on when you're leaving the station to walk to your office? haha. The argument for the tunnels make no sense to me.

I'm not even mad about the system being underground. The system should probably be underground (even Vancouver's Skytrain is underground in the core), but the problem are these damn tunnels (which are outdated as fuckkkkk on top btw).

Is the new line being built the same way? With underground cities and 500 different entry and exit points?
     
     
  #11836  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2018, 12:22 AM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
Husky Tower was rejected by Edmonton because of the City Centre Airport.
Was it tall???
     
     
  #11837  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2018, 3:00 AM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
Husky Tower was rejected by Edmonton because of the City Centre Airport.
And Husky took its ball to Calgary, and the rest is history. Talk about missed opportunity.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #11838  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2018, 3:06 AM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcantor View Post
it was envied for having the highest levels of disposable income in the country and for having the best shopping and the best fashion shopping in the country.
Good lord. No way in any way does Edmonton have the best fashion shopping in the country, nor did it ever. Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver and Calgary could eat Edmonton's fashion lunch all day long and never feel the least bit full.

Edmonton's fashion retail is also on a wicked downward spiral to boot. Just compare what Holt had to offer 20-25 years ago for men versus today. Just follow how Winnipeg's fashion retail has been gutted and you'll see the end game for Edmonton. And that makes me sad.

But I'm getting just a bit off topic now.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #11839  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2018, 3:08 AM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abii View Post
I'm relatively new to Edmonton's public transport system and the other day, while walking through the tunnels, I was thinking about the same thing. I talked to a guy from Calgary and he said they don't have these tunnels over there. To me they seem like a massive waste of space and money.

What is the point of having 15 different entry and exit points for every station? The net result is money wasted on heating empty spaces, running escalators, maintenance etc... You're also taking foot traffic away from up top. The smarter thing to do is to build more lines with simple station designs and cheap maintenance bills. The stations in Vancouver (what I'm used to) are literally small glass boxes with a set of escalators on either side, THAT'S IT! Okay, Vancouver has a different climate, but it's miserable in the winter nonetheless. Is it that difficult to put a jacket on when you're leaving the station to walk to your office? haha. The argument for the tunnels make no sense to me.

I'm not even mad about the system being underground. The system should probably be underground (even Vancouver's Skytrain is underground in the core), but the problem are these damn tunnels (which are outdated as fuckkkkk on top btw).

Is the new line being built the same way? With underground cities and 500 different entry and exit points?
The long and short of it would suggest that 1970s Edmonton was following the lead of Montreal and Toronto, i.e. an extensive underground pedestrian network connecting rapid transit with primary downtown complexes and towers.

Instead, Vancouver makes everyone slog through the rain. Ask me which design I'd prefer a whole heck of a lot.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #11840  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2018, 12:49 PM
kcantor kcantor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,987
^^

i’m talking 40 years ago - not today - when independents like lipton’s were at heritage when it opened and penn & teller opened wem’s phase 2 with their white tigers...
__________________
"If you did not want much, there was plenty." Harper Lee
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:04 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.