HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2461  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2018, 10:08 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cypherus View Post
I haven't heard anything about this potential development at 10257 King George and there does not appear to be an application yet submitted. Looks like a vision at this point but I like the design.



Website says it's a feasability study for the site. Pretty nice massing for a feasability study.

Looks to be about 54 storeys? Anyone know who owns the site?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2462  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2018, 9:35 PM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
^The site is just to the north and east of the GEC Mega Centre - see map below.

Even if it is just a feasibility study at this stage, it shows that someone is looking into developing that site, and likely working towards an application.

Hard to say if an application would retain that design - but the height is about right for that site.

There will also be a new road along the south edge of the site (102A Ave)




Last edited by Shift; Sep 26, 2018 at 9:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2463  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2018, 11:59 PM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 550
Tragically Surrey will have to lose the “Money Tree” branch currently at that location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2464  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2018, 1:25 AM
CoryHolmes CoryHolmes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blease View Post
Tragically Surrey will have to lose the “Money Tree” branch currently at that location.
Darn shame, that.

Didn't the sushi place in that block used to be where City Hall moved into? That old ratty, run-down stripmall along 104?

They're gonna have to move again, it seems. I keep meaning to try them out, but end up going across the street to Sushi King George.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2465  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2018, 5:56 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryHolmes View Post
Darn shame, that.

Didn't the sushi place in that block used to be where City Hall moved into? That old ratty, run-down stripmall along 104?

They're gonna have to move again, it seems. I keep meaning to try them out, but end up going across the street to Sushi King George.
You should try it. I'd be sad to see them go away, it is actually a good bang for your buck Sushi place. Much better than Sushi King imho. If you're into sashimi, they give you nice sized chunks.

Definitely should try it.

Only thing in that strip mall I'd hate to lose but honestly this type of development needs to go forward. If you think about that area with GEC being built (still possible), the Anthem property being all re-developed, and if this got built it would continue the spark of densification in the core.

With the proposal now for the additional Bosa property to the North, I'd be really surprised if in at least the next 5 years we don't see the Safeway site being redeveloped too and some push toward the King George Skytrain station cluster of towers.

I hope the momentum can keep going in Surrey.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2466  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2018, 11:23 PM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner View Post

With the proposal now for the additional Bosa property to the North, I'd be really surprised if in at least the next 5 years we don't see the Safeway site being redeveloped too and some push toward the King George Skytrain station cluster of towers.

I hope the momentum can keep going in Surrey.
The momentum is about to get going unlike anything seen so far.

In 2019 expect 15 towers to be under construction:

Hub Phase B (3 Towers)
Park Boulevard
Avani Centre
Park George (2 Towers)
City Centre 3
West Village 5
Linea
Bosa Blue Sky (2 Towers)
Veterans Village
Georgetown Phase 1 (1 Tower)
Townline Holland Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2467  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2018, 11:57 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Foster Martin

A three tower project in white rock start construction

https://www.peacearchnews.com/news/officials-break-ground-for-3-towers-in-white-rock/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2468  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 3:38 AM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
It’s the Foster Martin towers, I expect they’ll turn out very nicely. I drop by White Rock every now and then, it reminds me of West Vancouver. Foster Martin in particular remind me of some of the more upscale developments in West Van like Evelyn and the upcoming Grosvenor project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2469  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 5:18 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blease View Post
It’s the Foster Martin towers, I expect they’ll turn out very nicely. I drop by White Rock every now and then, it reminds me of West Vancouver. Foster Martin in particular remind me of some of the more upscale developments in West Van like Evelyn and the upcoming Grosvenor project.
They havethe floor plans on their site. Penthouse looks nice!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2470  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 7:29 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,026
homeless shelter housing

Video Link
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2471  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 2:37 PM
EhJay EhJay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 772
At the end of the day, it's a complicated issue. Can't just ship the homeless people anywhere. There needs to be more shelters, more supports, and more options for getting better. Until then, all will end up happening is gentrification and displacing people from one area to the next. And it'll continue to get worse with the fentanyl crisis continuing to pull recreational drug users down even further and off being able to hold a job down. Throw in automation and loss of jobs in the near future and it'll just get worse.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2472  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 2:50 PM
Bombaman Bombaman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 56
After they got removed from 135a, these people always gather along Kingsway just on the opposite side of one of the homeless shelther. If they are not relocated to another area in the next 3 to 10 years. As the population grows, I can see that area become "The Surrey's East Hasting".
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
homeless shelter housing

Video Link

Last edited by Bombaman; Sep 28, 2018 at 4:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2473  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 5:14 PM
Aroundtheworld Aroundtheworld is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by EhJay View Post
At the end of the day, it's a complicated issue. Can't just ship the homeless people anywhere. There needs to be more shelters, more supports, and more options for getting better. Until then, all will end up happening is gentrification and displacing people from one area to the next. And it'll continue to get worse with the fentanyl crisis continuing to pull recreational drug users down even further and off being able to hold a job down.
I agree. It will take time for the benefits of this to be seen. Shelters are only the first step towards helping these people live better lives and ultimately for improving the community. With a shelter, there is a means for providing treatment and support; you can't do effectively when they are homeless.

We will only stop seeing the people who need these shelters when child abuse, sexual assault and other traumatic activities cease to happen (i.e. a long time). We are seeing the product of a violent past. We can either choose to sweep it under the rug and pretend it isn't there, or do something to improve the situation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2474  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 5:23 PM
Bombaman Bombaman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 56
Isn't it interesting most Asian immigrants rarely have this issue? I think most of the homeless are drug addicts and they made their choices. Even if you give them 100k each, most of them will blow it away on drugs quickly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EhJay View Post
At the end of the day, it's a complicated issue. Can't just ship the homeless people anywhere. There needs to be more shelters, more supports, and more options for getting better. Until then, all will end up happening is gentrification and displacing people from one area to the next. And it'll continue to get worse with the fentanyl crisis continuing to pull recreational drug users down even further and off being able to hold a job down. Throw in automation and loss of jobs in the near future and it'll just get worse.

Last edited by Bombaman; Sep 28, 2018 at 7:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2475  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 7:04 PM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bombaman View Post
Isn't it interesting most Asian immigrants rarely have this issue? I think most of the homeless are drug addicts and they made their choices to become ones. Even if you give them 100k each, most of them will blow it away on drugs quickly.

Whatever problem the addicts had to begin with, they get so much when cold hard cash is handed to them. If I could have it my way, I would support, shelters and soup kitchens for the homeless and lengthy jail terms for those who dispose used needles on the streets, especially near schools.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2476  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 7:30 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aroundtheworld View Post
I agree. It will take time for the benefits of this to be seen. Shelters are only the first step towards helping these people live better lives and ultimately for improving the community. With a shelter, there is a means for providing treatment and support; you can't do effectively when they are homeless.

We will only stop seeing the people who need these shelters when child abuse, sexual assault and other traumatic activities cease to happen (i.e. a long time). We are seeing the product of a violent past. We can either choose to sweep it under the rug and pretend it isn't there, or do something to improve the situation.
Would be nice to think there is treatment and support: but who makes sure there are follow-ups when people are placed in such shelters? Essentially shelters are rugs and you are still sweeping the problem under the rugs and pretend they're not there. The rugs don't come cheap, so that's why we need the follow-ups.

All the problems you mentioned come as a result of a vicious circle...starting from the free drug use culture of the 60s to the present. A few more disciplinary actions and spankings by responsible parents back then would prevent many of such issues today.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blease View Post
Whatever problem the addicts had to begin with, they get so much when cold hard cash is handed to them. If I could have it my way, I would support, shelters and soup kitchens for the homeless and lengthy jail terms for those who dispose used needles on the streets, especially near schools.
That would be a good start: you break the law, you pay for it as a criminal. Disposing used needles in public places like parks is tantamount to murder if children step on them, get sick and die as a result. We are currently too tolerant as a society to let everything go out of hand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2477  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 8:30 PM
Aroundtheworld Aroundtheworld is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blease View Post
Whatever problem the addicts had to begin with, they get so much when cold hard cash is handed to them. If I could have it my way, I would support, shelters and soup kitchens for the homeless and lengthy jail terms for those who dispose used needles on the streets, especially near schools.
Strangely enough, it's actually cheaper to house them and provide a social worker than it is to leave them on the street. There are very high incarceration and medical costs for homeless people.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2478  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 10:00 PM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aroundtheworld View Post
Strangely enough, it's actually cheaper to house them and provide a social worker than it is to leave them on the street. There are very high incarceration and medical costs for homeless people.
Yes house them and feed them by all means, but we shouldn’t have to tolerate them using our public spaces as an all purpose garbage can and toilet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2479  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2018, 10:17 PM
Jalapeño Chips Jalapeño Chips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Vancouver, B.C
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Would be nice to think there is treatment and support: but who makes sure there are follow-ups when people are placed in such shelters? Essentially shelters are rugs and you are still sweeping the problem under the rugs and pretend they're not there. The rugs don't come cheap, so that's why we need the follow-ups.

All the problems you mentioned come as a result of a vicious circle...starting from the free drug use culture of the 60s to the present. A few more disciplinary actions and spankings by responsible parents back then would prevent many of such issues today.



That would be a good start: you break the law, you pay for it as a criminal. Disposing used needles in public places like parks is tantamount to murder if children step on them, get sick and die as a result. We are currently too tolerant as a society to let everything go out of hand.
You obviously have no clue, and no credibility, do you? Where are your stats, links, etc, to back that garbage up? The drugs in Vancouver began in the Chinese opium dens in bowels of Chinatown at the turn of the 19th -20th century. It was the Chinese who started drugs in Vancouver. It wasn't until the 30's that others dabbled. The problem started a long time ago buddy. Learn history. Stop spewing garbage.

Here, some links to a history lesson:

https://theprovince.com/feature/from-opium-to-fentanyl-how-did-we-get-here
http://www.vancouversun.com/this%2Bweek%...um%2Bdens%2Bchinatown/9537540/story.html
https://theprovince.com/news/local-news/...rs-a-1901-visit-to-a-chinatown-opium-den

Last edited by Jalapeño Chips; Sep 28, 2018 at 10:24 PM. Reason: Added another link.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2480  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2018, 4:52 AM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Would be nice to think there is treatment and support: but who makes sure there are follow-ups when people are placed in such shelters? Essentially shelters are rugs and you are still sweeping the problem under the rugs and pretend they're not there. The rugs don't come cheap, so that's why we need the follow-ups.

All the problems you mentioned come as a result of a vicious circle...starting from the free drug use culture of the 60s to the present. A few more disciplinary actions and spankings by responsible parents back then would prevent many of such issues today.

That would be a good start: you break the law, you pay for it as a criminal. Disposing used needles in public places like parks is tantamount to murder if children step on them, get sick and die as a result. We are currently too tolerant as a society to let everything go out of hand.
This isn't really the thread for this topic so this is the only post I'll make on this <sarcasm>new</sarcasm> topic within this thread, but I wanted to respond to your post because it unfortunately seems to portray a very narrow view of the world. I don't disagree with you that there needs to be follow-up, but we also have this thing called a Human Rights Code and unfortunately the sword swings both ways. Do people wanting to stop smoking quit the first time they try? What about alcoholics. Follow up sounds great in concept, but it is NOT as easy as you make it sound. Again, like I said a very narrow view of the world, and one I doubt has been touched by a major addiction of any kind.

Drug use has been around since pre-Egyption times. That's 3000+ years. To say it is all because of the 60s is just a _bit_ short-sighted. There's drug use in Asia, in Russia, in Europe, in South America. The "free drugs" 60s was a North American situation, so your reasoning is flawed at best just looking at the last 60 years. Expand it to the last 3,000 years and you can start to see how you may be just a bit off on the root cause of the problem I hope.

Honestly it is the thinking you're displaying in the above quote that is why we have such an issue today actually. Prohibition has never, in the history of humanity, lead to a long-term solution. The only solution is root-cause analysis and repair. Again don't get me wrong, I agree with parts of your post, especially when it comes to criminal action. Dumping needles on the ground also pisses me off. So does breaking into cars to feed drug addictions. Or people that run red lights (which kills far more people per year than discarded needles has in probably the last 100 years). But it can't all just be anger "THROW THEM IN JAIL" "Damned 60s!" as that will lead to no solutions at all, just a lot of wasted time, effort, and money.

A large portion of the homeless have mental disorders and should be in psychiatric hospitals. Instead they were all pretty much closed down to save money to prop up big spending promises by past governments. If you do a bit of historical digging you'll find ALL of the past governments regardless of political polarization, contributed.

Those without mental disorders, I guarantee the majority of have a root-cause that lead them to drugs. Yes it was a "choice" in the loose sense of the word just like you have a "choice" to go to work every day and earn a living (do you really tough?). But many turned to drugs as a mechanism to bury the pain or hurt at the root of their problems. No different than people that bury themselves at a casino many times a day, or those that work out twice a day 7 days a week, or those that pound down sugar even though their doctor tells them they'll have a heart attack.

Most of the time these types of actions are a result of hiding from some issue they don't want to, or are not able to deal with.

Ask any parent that has taken a stance of "tough love" how that has worked out for them with their children. You'll realize how it does far more harm than actually working on the root-cause and dropping the confirmation bias does.

Hey I make very good money and pay a lot of tax. I would be lying if I didn't admit a piece of me in my head screams "get off your damned drugs and stop taking tax dollars out of my pocket!" but facts are facts, and if you look at the latest numbers in from the opioid crisis, you'll see quite clearly that the MAJORITY of overdoses are not homeless, or people on Hastings, or in Whalley, but actually sons and daughters, mothers and fathers, in middle to upper-class homes across the region.

And to another poster earlier, yes there are immigrant Asians in that list.

I challenge everyone to look up what confirmation bias means, then look in a mirror and start doing some research with an open mind before you start throwing stones. If you don't want to, then you're part of the problem and part of why we are where we are today.

Last edited by GMasterAres; Oct 1, 2018 at 5:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.