HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5541  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2018, 4:08 AM
Sheba Sheba is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by scryer View Post
They've started construction on what they are calling is preliminary work on 104tha and 148th. I'm not sure what they are doing but I have walked by it a couple of times. Does anyone have any insights?
The Project: Surrey LRT

104 Avenue Feeder Watermain Relocation

A 600 mm watermain currently runs down the centre of 104 Avenue, under what will be the future LRT track. The section of that watermain between City Parkway and 144 Street is being relocated now, prior to construction of LRT.

104 Avenue Trunk Storm Sewer Relocation

A 900 mm storm sewer pipe runs down the centre of 104 Avenue under what will be the future LRT track. The section of pipe between 148 and 150 Streets is being relocated now, prior to construction of LRT.
     
     
  #5542  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2018, 4:09 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,156
I take it Surrey First is trying to pull a Christy Clark here? Or would they have to be moved for a BRT/SkyTrain too?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram View Post
are you ready for surrey's meathead drivers?
To be fair, the prick would've tried to breeze through the red - and the pedestrian cross without looking - even if the streetcar wasn't there.
     
     
  #5543  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2018, 4:19 AM
Firebrand's Avatar
Firebrand Firebrand is offline
D-Class Suburbanite
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
I take it Surrey First is trying to pull a Christy Clark here?
Pretty much. They’re moving as far along as possible so that there’s no chance of returning back.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
To be fair, the prick would've tried to breeze through the red - and the pedestrian cross without looking - even if the streetcar wasn't there.
Idiot drivers are everywhere in this continent; having a train directly exposed to vehicle traffic will exacerbate the problem now that you have people in it.
     
     
  #5544  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2018, 4:47 AM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram View Post
lifted from Metro Vancouver Transit Discussion



are you ready for surrey's meathead drivers?
That is one of the TTC's old street car lines, not a new LRT station. I believe they have been operating like that for over 150 years (since back when the street cars were pulled by horses). The system proposed for Surrey would have proper stations, not these archaic stops. I'm not saying I support the proposed system but fearmongering just weakens your cause. Reading this forum one would think we were in Salem Massachusetts.

Video Link
     
     
  #5545  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2018, 5:30 AM
Firebrand's Avatar
Firebrand Firebrand is offline
D-Class Suburbanite
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger1818 View Post
That is one of the TTC's old street car lines, not a new LRT station. I believe they have been operating like that for over 150 years (since back when the street cars were pulled by horses). The system proposed for Surrey would have proper stations, not these archaic stops. I'm not saying I support the proposed system but fearmongering just weakens your cause. Reading this forum one would think we were in Salem Massachusetts.


These stations are not even barricaded. I didn’t see any stations that are fenced off from vehicle traffic; an idiot on an 18-wheeler might skid and crash into the station.

***

Unrelated, but how can you still be awake at 1:30 in the morning? It’s bedtime in the East.
     
     
  #5546  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2018, 5:50 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebrand View Post
These stations are not even barricaded. I didn’t see any stations that are fenced off from vehicle traffic; an idiot on an 18-wheeler might skid and crash into the station.
The point is that Surrey's light rail is in a traffic-separated median, so if one wants to point out how much LRT sucks, best stick to videos of LRV collisions in medians (of which there's plenty lying around the internet). Linking every traffic incident that happens to have a tram in it does not help the conversation one bit and borders on herd/mob mentality - the tram above wasn't even responsible for the crash!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebrand View Post
Unrelated, but how can you still be awake at 1:30 in the morning? It’s bedtime in the East.
It's a long weekend, isn't it? Who cares what time people are logged in, so long as they have a good point to make? I for one - and I'm guessing you too, on occasion - have been up much later than 2am.

Last edited by Migrant_Coconut; Sep 2, 2018 at 6:29 AM. Reason: Typo
     
     
  #5547  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2018, 6:41 AM
Firebrand's Avatar
Firebrand Firebrand is offline
D-Class Suburbanite
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
The point is that Surrey's light rail is in a traffic-separated median, so if one wants to point out how much LRT sucks, best stick to videos of LRV collisions in medians. Linking every traffic incident that happens to have a tram in it does not help the conversation one bit and borders on herd/mob mentality - the tram above wasn't even responsible for the crash!
I didn’t say that every accident involving a tram is caused by a tram. What I’m saying is that idiot drivers (like the one in the video) will disobey the rules and will create inconvenience to everyone adjacent to the incident. Since they will have to ban some left turns on 104th once they get the train running, there will always be one dumb driver that will turn while the train approaches. I guess the driver has to bolt home to go to the bathroom.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
It's a long weekend, isn't it? Who cares what time people are logged in, so long as they have a good point to make? I for one (and I'm guessing you too, on occasion) have been up much later than 2am.


Hipocrisy hurts sometimes. What else can you do when you have nothing to do? Unless you have an exam the very next day, but school hasn’t started yet, so who gives?

Last edited by Firebrand; Sep 2, 2018 at 6:44 AM. Reason: Wrong choice of words
     
     
  #5548  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2018, 9:22 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebrand View Post
Pretty much. They’re moving as far along as possible so that there’s no chance of returning back.



Idiot drivers are everywhere in this continent; having a train directly exposed to vehicle traffic will exacerbate the problem now that you have people in it.
Look how far they moved along the George Massey and they still cancelled it.
     
     
  #5549  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2018, 7:04 AM
Firebrand's Avatar
Firebrand Firebrand is offline
D-Class Suburbanite
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 590
There’s a tweet that I just found from Global News:

https://mobile.twitter.com/globalbc/status/1036769782085898241?s=21
     
     
  #5550  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 12:33 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,720
Thanks.

Here you go:

Federal government confirms investment in Surrey LRT and Broadway subway line
https://globalnews.ca/news/4426775/the-f...-in-surrey-lrt-and-broadway-subway-line/
     
     
  #5551  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:19 AM
Firebrand's Avatar
Firebrand Firebrand is offline
D-Class Suburbanite
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Thanks.

Here you go:

Federal government confirms investment in Surrey LRT and Broadway subway line
https://globalnews.ca/news/4426775/the-f...-in-surrey-lrt-and-broadway-subway-line/
What’s the point? It’s just a rehash of the same crap, only with Trudeau in it because he wants to look like he’s doing good due to the TransMountain nonsense he’s has to deal with.
     
     
  #5552  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:24 AM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebrand View Post
What’s the point? It’s just a rehash of the same crap, only with Trudeau in it because he wants to look like he’s doing good due to the TransMountain nonsense he’s has to deal with.
Every government will announce funding for the same project multiple times, especially when it is getting close to an election.
     
     
  #5553  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:40 AM
Firebrand's Avatar
Firebrand Firebrand is offline
D-Class Suburbanite
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger1818 View Post
Every government will announce funding for the same project multiple times, especially when it is getting close to an election.
The Federal Election is almost a year away, so it’s easy to see why he’s pulling a PR stunt.
     
     
  #5554  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 2:12 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,156
Three more candidates openly against LRT. If our wishes are granted and Surrey elects a pro-SkyTrain council that gets the project cancelled, what happens on Trudeau's and/or Horgan's end?
     
     
  #5555  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 2:34 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Three more candidates openly against LRT. If our wishes are granted and Surrey elects a pro-SkyTrain council that gets the project cancelled, what happens on Trudeau's and/or Horgan's end?
Given that Horgan's positioned himself as the local/mayors' premier, I'd think he'd support the decision. The NDP seemed to emphasize local autonomy rather than the LRT specifically, so I think they'd be on board provided the rest of the mayors are too.

And with Trudeau, I don't think he really cares what kind of transit runs in Surrey haha. As long as the money stays more or less the same, which I think estimates show it would, I think he'd support it as well.
     
     
  #5556  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 2:35 AM
Sheba Sheba is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger1818 View Post
Every government will announce funding for the same project multiple times, especially when it is getting close to an election.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebrand View Post
The Federal Election is almost a year away, so it’s easy to see why he’s pulling a PR stunt.
...and we have local elections in October. Expect more photo ops in the next month and a half-ish.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
If our wishes are granted and Surrey elects a pro-SkyTrain council that gets the project cancelled, what happens on Trudeau's and/or Horgan's end?
Not much. They committed to improving transit - not the tech that powers it. They'll follow up with the promised money if there's a plan ready to go.
     
     
  #5557  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:24 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
Not much. They committed to improving transit - not the tech that powers it. They'll follow up with the promised money if there's a plan ready to go.
Different place and different era, but when a newly elected city council in Ottawa cancelled their 2006 LRT plan, the province and feds punished the city financially when the current system (more of a light metro) was proposed by only committing money based on preliminary estimates that didn't take inflation into account. As a result the city had to find ways to save money on the plan and contribute more than the 1/3 of the cost initially budgeted.
     
     
  #5558  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 8:05 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,720
Quote:
TransLink now accepting bids to build Surrey LRT
by Martin MacMahon
Posted Sep 5, 2018 11:59 am PDT
Last Updated Sep 5, 2018 at 1:02 pm PDT
...
TransLink is now putting out a call to prospective builders to bid on the Surrey-Newton-Guildford line with construction beginning as soon as 2020. The transit authority says they hope to narrow down a short list and award a contract next year.
...
https://www.citynews1130.com/2018/09/05/translink-now-accepting-bids-build-surrey-lrt/
     
     
  #5559  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 9:02 PM
Firebrand's Avatar
Firebrand Firebrand is offline
D-Class Suburbanite
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 590
^
     
     
  #5560  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 9:27 PM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Keep in mind the Evergreen Line went through the same process - depending on the mayor that is elected in the next election, there may be another twist in the discussion.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:51 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.