HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8741  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2018, 11:54 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 7,862

https://www.instagram.com/p/BnUM9TzhBCI/?taken-by=tannerwoods_
Woodsy (@tannerwoods_) on Instagram: “Ahh Winnipeg from on top of the Manitoba Hydro building
     
     
  #8742  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 12:37 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
Interesting, I feel the opposite way. I think the city feels massive at street level, but honestly in skyline shots not as much. I think this is for a couple reasons:
- Because Toronto doesn't have natural barriers to its downtown, it's hard to understand the area actually covered by all those skyscrapers (at least for those of us not from Toronto). Manhattan, for example, looks massive because you have tall buildings water to water, edge to edge - it looks dominant. With Toronto's quick transition into rowhouses, and also concentration along Yonge Street, reduces its overall impact I think. When you're on the street walking for an hour though and the buildings don't end, then it feels like what it really is.
- Less important, but also when so many buildings are 150m/200m+ it's hard to grasp their scale from aerials too. There's nothing to compare them to, and they just look like generally tall buildings. But here again when you actually walk on the street and compare them to yourself, their true scale is much more obvious.
Depends what skyline shots you're looking at. If they're taken from far away and/or really high up the skyline looks less impressive. From the right angles and from in amongst the forest of highrises (30-40th floor of a building for instance), the core looks massive. It's a bit of an optical illusion though because you don't see all the blocks of low/mid rises between the towers.

Only when I'm in the old CBD, Southcore, and a few select other spots do I feel like I'm in a big city. Almost everywhere else I could be tricked into thinking I'm in metro of 1 million people or less. There are just too many obsolete 2-20 floor buildings scattered all about. Maybe in 10 years when more of these have been replaced with something 40-80 floors it won't feel like that any more.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #8743  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 12:40 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
Ummm what about a little thing called Lake Ontario?
And the other 3 sides?
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #8744  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 12:52 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
And the other 3 sides?
What about Lake Huron and Georgian Bay sir. Clearly impacting growth.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #8745  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 2:11 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,077
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #8746  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 2:19 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
Depends what skyline shots you're looking at. If they're taken from far away and/or really high up the skyline looks less impressive. From the right angles and from in amongst the forest of highrises (30-40th floor of a building for instance), the core looks massive. It's a bit of an optical illusion though because you don't see all the blocks of low/mid rises between the towers.

Only when I'm in the old CBD, Southcore, and a few select other spots do I feel like I'm in a big city. Almost everywhere else I could be tricked into thinking I'm in metro of 1 million people or less. There are just too many obsolete 2-20 floor buildings scattered all about. Maybe in 10 years when more of these have been replaced with something 40-80 floors it won't feel like that any more.
Yeah this is definitely true. I was referring mostly to aerials, with some commenting on how expansive it looks. Never really looked all that expansive to me, and again I think that's just because it's hard to scale. Somewhere like Manhattan, or yes downtown Vancouver, looks more expansive to me because it covers the whole area, while the sea of rowhouses is still visible in most Toronto aerials.
     
     
  #8747  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 2:22 AM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
And the other 3 sides?

It was said to have no natural barriers. I was pointing out the obviois side that does. One could also argue the Don Valley is its second natural bartier. I just assumed you read the post I was responding to.
     
     
  #8748  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 2:35 AM
GeneralLea's Avatar
GeneralLea GeneralLea is offline
Midtowner since 2K
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Midtown Toronto
Posts: 5,974
Wow, great Edmonton shots.

Those Toronto photos are good, but dated, albeit not by much, but to a very noticeable extent. That Entertainment District shot just makes me depressed....cramming as much density into an area while removing the allure it had before. (It's an exaggerated thing to say...but it's got some weight to it)


EDIT: Wow....that avenue in Winnipeg looks pretty neat.
__________________
"Living life on the edge"
     
     
  #8749  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 5:19 AM
GeneralLea's Avatar
GeneralLea GeneralLea is offline
Midtowner since 2K
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Midtown Toronto
Posts: 5,974
Tommy Thompson Views (2018, 09)

I took some photos from Tommy Thompson Park today....incredible seeing the skyline every time, especially as it changes a bit every year:
[IMG]TJ043842 by Josh Kenn Photographics, on Flickr[/IMG]
[IMG]TJ043961 by Josh Kenn Photographics, on Flickr[/IMG]
[IMG]TJ044070 by Josh Kenn Photographics, on Flickr[/IMG]
[IMG]TJ044054 by Josh Kenn Photographics, on Flickr[/IMG]
__________________
"Living life on the edge"
     
     
  #8750  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:03 PM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
What about Lake Huron and Georgian Bay sir. Clearly impacting growth.
Toronto doesn't stretch anywhere near either of those. Lake Huron and Georgian Bay have no impact on the density of downtown Toronto. The reference point is Manhattan. Water has forced Manhattan to grow vertically and use every available lot wisely.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #8751  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:10 PM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
It was said to have no natural barriers. I was pointing out the obviois side that does. One could also argue the Don Valley is its second natural bartier. I just assumed you read the post I was responding to.
I did read that post. Yes, Lake Ontario is a natural barrier but to be constrained one needs barriers on all sides or at least 3. The Don Valley may become a natural barrier but downtown hasn't grown east to it yet. We're only now starting to see high rises near the Don.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #8752  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:14 PM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
Yeah this is definitely true. I was referring mostly to aerials, with some commenting on how expansive it looks. Never really looked all that expansive to me, and again I think that's just because it's hard to scale. Somewhere like Manhattan, or yes downtown Vancouver, looks more expansive to me because it covers the whole area, while the sea of rowhouses is still visible in most Toronto aerials.
Halifax could theoretically end up having that same phenomenon that exists in Vancouver. Downtown Halifax is still quite small but if the city keeps growing as it has the last 5 years the downtown will eventually reach the MacDonald Bridge. After that it would have to expand northwards to the MacKay Bridge and west to the Armdale Rotary. When/if this happens downtown Halifax will effectively be the entire peninsula.

This would take a very long time however. Halifax Peninsula is 33 sq km compared to 10 sq km for downtown Vancouver + the West End + Stanley Park.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT

Last edited by isaidso; Sep 5, 2018 at 2:04 PM.
     
     
  #8753  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:27 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
Toronto doesn't stretch anywhere near either of those. Lake Huron and Georgian Bay have no impact on the density of downtown Toronto. The reference point is Manhattan. Water has forced Manhattan to grow vertically and use every available lot wisely.
Twas a joke.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #8754  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:40 PM
mistercorporate's Avatar
mistercorporate mistercorporate is offline
The Fruit of Discipline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,036
People overstate how big Manhattan is, downtown Toronto is just as dense as Lower Manhattan, and midtown is pretty close to Midtown. We just have Riverdale Park to the East, UofT's low density strip to the West and the St. Mike's hospital flight path that limits height between Massey Tower and Ryerson, so aerial shots make it look like it's less dense than it is because of all the low rises on the periphery:

__________________
MLS: Toronto FC
Canadian Premier League: York 9 FC
NBA: Raptors
     
     
  #8755  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:45 PM
suburbanite's Avatar
suburbanite suburbanite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Toronto & NYC
Posts: 5,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistercorporate View Post
People overstate how big Manhattan is, downtown Toronto is just as dense as Lower Manhattan, and midtown is pretty close to Midtown. We just have Riverdale Park to the East, UofT's low density strip to the West and the St. Mike's hospital flight path that limits height between Massey Tower and Ryerson, so aerial shots make it look like it's less dense than it is because of all the low rises on the periphery:
That's a stretch.
__________________
Discontented suburbanite since 1994
     
     
  #8756  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:45 PM
q12's Avatar
q12 q12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 5,134
     
     
  #8757  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 1:51 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
I did read that post. Yes, Lake Ontario is a natural barrier but to be constrained one needs barriers on all sides or at least 3. The Don Valley may become a natural barrier but downtown hasn't grown east to it yet. We're only now starting to see high rises near the Don.

Again, he said there were "no" barriers. The lake is one. And the Don has acted as a barrier almost since Toronto was founded. Maybe it hasn't seen much high-rise construction but it has been high density and for a very very long time now.
     
     
  #8758  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 2:56 PM
Spocket's Avatar
Spocket Spocket is offline
Back from the dead
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistercorporate View Post
People overstate how big Manhattan is, downtown Toronto is just as dense as Lower Manhattan, and midtown is pretty close to Midtown. We just have Riverdale Park to the East, UofT's low density strip to the West and the St. Mike's hospital flight path that limits height between Massey Tower and Ryerson, so aerial shots make it look like it's less dense than it is because of all the low rises on the periphery:

Uhmmmm...nope.

Manhattan is definitely more dense than Toronto. It seems to me that you're seriously underestimating Manhattan and grossly exaggerating Toronto's density.

Virtually every single thing in that image of Manhattan is high density. Not to mention that it doesn't include anything across the rivers and harbors. Manhattan alone has about 520 million square feet of office space compared to Toronto's 70.

I just did a quick quasi-comparison of my own. I managed to draw a fairly generous perimeter of downtown Toronto. I still couldn't help but get a few single family homes in the form of row housing and three storey walk-ups. As well, there were more than a few parking lots and unused former/current industrial areas. My area came out to roughly 21 square kilometers.

For New York I stopped at the rather arbitrary point of a line running along the northern edge of Central Park. Arbitrary because it doesn't stop there but at 30 square kilometers (roughly) it was more than large enough to make the point. In New York it was difficult to find anything lower than 3 storeys and even those were somewhat rare. Additionally, the average height of the "low" stuff was 5 or 6 floors. On top of that, there were far more skyscrapers and they were much taller. It was wall to wall high density and, again, it didn't really end anywhere near the perimeter you drew. Also, Manhattan is roughly 3 kilometers wide (at the narrowest point) whereas Toronto is roughly 1 and a half at best at its widest. It's much, much smaller...more of a strip by comparison to Manhattan.

I honestly don't understand why you said what you said but you're clearly off base. If you want to compare a few blocks of Toronto to Manhattan then sure, it's an apt comparison. Now compare the densest parts of Manhattan to the densest parts of Toronto and still see if there's a comparison to be made. Toronto's dense and it's a great city but please...there's no comparison here. If there is then virtually every city in North America can be "as dense as Manhattan." if you only include the densest few blocks. New York is an alpha level city and quite possibly the world's top city overall. Toronto is a beta class city and while it's globally known, it's no New York. The only city that even gets in the same ballpark in North America is Chicago and while it certainly has a very impressive skyline, it's fairly well defined and smaller in its footprint than Manhattan.
__________________
Giving you a reason to drink and drive since 1975.

Last edited by Spocket; Sep 5, 2018 at 3:33 PM.
     
     
  #8759  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 3:38 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,168
Re dt density - From the last census (2016) somebody here counted up the census tracts that make up 5 sq miles of downtown Toronto. Came out to 200 000, or 40 000/sq mile. The density drops quite a bit outside that zone. Densest parts of Manhattan are over 100 000 per. Here's a bar graph that might be interesting to look at. Even Harlem is super dense.

http://mycrains.crainsnewyork.com/stats-...aphics/most-crowded-neighborhoods-in-nyc
     
     
  #8760  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2018, 3:38 PM
mistercorporate's Avatar
mistercorporate mistercorporate is offline
The Fruit of Discipline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,036
__________________
MLS: Toronto FC
Canadian Premier League: York 9 FC
NBA: Raptors
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:37 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.