Some new homes are good and some are bad, some old homes are good and some are bad. So in other words not any kind of a definitive answer. lol.
In my experience old homes are built better, excluding the small cheap wartime bungalows that you'll find in West Hillhurst or Mountview, or neighborhoods of that era. If they're built before the 30's or after the 40's they are built well. Especially houses from the 50's, if you ever try to demo the interiors by hand , they're built like army tanks and don't come apart easily.
I know quite a few people with house that are less than 20 years old, and the houses are showing signs of wear. The overall bones are still mostly solid, but lots of little things are failing.. doors and windows that aren't square, cheap crappy windows that don't slide or open properly...siding or stucco coming loose or falling off. floors that are squeaky even after a mere 10 years. IMO new home are built for shit. I also own a new home and have had these problems myself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedog
Older houses have 16" center studs, newer homes have 24" centers - not sure which is better. Newer houses have composite beams which are better. I've seen brand new homes that have perfectly straight interior and exterior walls and other brand new homes that have waves, dips, valleys, waves, etc. I've been in new homes that have perfectly level floors and others that are a nightmare.
I install cabinets for a living and as such, am in and out of all sorts of new housing - SFH, townhomes, duplexes, multifamily. The quality basically comes down to the builder in my experience - the best homes I've worked in have been in are all from smaller builders. The bigger the builder, the more problems I seem to encounter.
Older homes, yeah I've done many a renovation and again, some are good and some are bad.
|