HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2018, 3:13 PM
moorhosj moorhosj is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
The labor force participation was below 60% in the 1950's and 60's until the baby boom hit the workforce and pushed it into the mid 60%'s. Now it's fallen down to 63% or so which is totally reasonable considering millions of baby boomers are retiring.
Laborforce Participation increased because women joined the workforce, not baby boomers. The baby boomers weren't part of the measurement before they were old enough to join the workforce, so that argument doesn't really pass muster. There is no need to go back 60 years, just 5 years ago we had a higher laborforce participation rate during a weak recovery. Somehow in a "booming" economy people aren't joining the laborforce, please explain as this goes against all known labor economics models. Housing starts are also down 12% compared to last year, does that sound like a "boom"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:20 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.