Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy?
"...community made it clear they only would allow for more density along arterial roads, were most rental buildings were already located." - CityDuo
This is key. Usually left out of the conversation about teardowns, affordability, loss of "affordable" (old) apartments, and loss of small or local businesses. We are restricted to existing zoned areas that allow multi-unit or mixed-use above 3-stories, and these are located where older and the last more affordable rental units are and usually only along arterial roads. We are usually not opening up new land to be developed for low/mid-rise rental while leaving the older stock alone, but merely telling land owners and developers that they can get more units and height only on existing zoned multi-unit lots. So the only choice is to evict and teardown older apartments.
Loss of older apartment units, brought to you by keeping communities full of SF homes.
|
I been saying this for years.
The mid rises building should be going up on the blocks directly parallel, but behind the great streets of Vancouver.
Be it Main, Commercial, etc, I find it absolutely critical to retain low rise retail along these streets, with accessible rents.
Travelling outside of Vancouver makes it so incredibly apparent just how dominated our city has become by generic corporate retail.
This all due to premium leases needed to justify new CRU's attached to mid rise residential projects.