Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000
Nashville - to small.
Newark & Pittsburgh - I would favor Pittsburgh. Both cities would be a challenge to recruit outside talent and Newark/NJ taxes are the highest in the country.
|
I consider Nashville a dark horse for a couple of reasons.
1. Tennessee, like GA / NC / TX, is very generous with tax incentives to land business expansions / relocations (which is important to Amazon).
2. It's an up and coming, yet still young city that Amazon could morph into its own as it matures.
3. It has a culture that's very attrative to millenials and Amazon would have no problem recruiting talent there.
Besides all of that, it doesn't hurt that the person at Amazon leading the search is a native of Nashville.
As far as Pittsburgh, it has CMU (which is, I believe, Amazon's top school for recruitment). So attracting outside talent won't be as much of an issue as it would be in other cities with smaller or no tech-centric schools. Plus, Amazon may or may not want to be recognized positively for choosing to inject life into a fledgling city via. HQ2.
As far as Newark, the same point with respect to being a fledgling city also applies here. Plus, it's basically the perfect central location if Amazon wants easy access to all of the talent in the Boston - NYC - Philadelphia -DC corridor. Lastly, while Newark's taxes are high on paper, it still has an overall lower cost of living than DC, NYC or Boston and Amazon would be exempt from a lot of those taxes via. the $7 billion incentive package.
But I do agree that the main drawback for these places is their size. They simply don't have the infrastructure to handle the explosive growth Amazon would bring. That's why I only consider then dark horses and not top contenders.