^ I think they make Sydney look huge so I guess our senses of perception are just different.
In terms of the "jaw dropping" my reply wasn't meant to be witty. I just don't consider it believable that they'd be impressed, but I haven't met many Australians so who knows.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoomer
If it’s primarily the buildings you love, then yes the imposing nature of those Sydney examples would be pretty powerful. To me it’s almost too close, I’d rather have the buildings set back a bit further so I could appreciate their form and design a bit better. Looking down West Hastings in Vancouver towards the Marine Building is a bit of a combination of the two styles for me, The buildings here feel more imposing than most of Vancouver, yet still has a nice pedestrian feel.
West Hastings
But as Metro-One says, I also much prefer the Vancouver and even Victoria pedestrian focus approach - maybe it’s a west coast preference thing.
|
That section is great. i love how the highrises rise directly from the sidewalk, that they're pretty slender rather than spanning multiple lots, and how they're nestled closely between the other buildings.
But yeah, for me it's more about the pedestrian experience than the individual buildings. For instance, i also appreciate areas like
this part of Sao Paulo which doesn't have particularly attractive architecture. I just love the idea/feeling of being completely immersed in intense, complex, imposing urbanity. Now don't get me wrong; I love sunshine and I wouldn't want the entire, or even the majority, of a city to be tall and imposing. I just view the CBD as an exception.