HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5141  
Old Posted May 3, 2018, 7:21 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,712
Another better pic from the Province (not backlit):


The City of Surrey unveiled a Light Rapid Transit vehicle on Wednesday, May 2, 2018, to show residents "an example of the wide selection of light rail cars available for LRT projects," according to a release. PNG
http://theprovince.com/news/local-news/m...wcm/54e6767c-8d8a-43d1-b0e1-2804a22d6e8c
     
     
  #5142  
Old Posted May 3, 2018, 7:40 PM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Another better pic from the Province (not backlit):


The City of Surrey unveiled a Light Rapid Transit vehicle on Wednesday, May 2, 2018, to show residents "an example of the wide selection of light rail cars available for LRT projects," according to a release. PNG
http://theprovince.com/news/local-news/m...wcm/54e6767c-8d8a-43d1-b0e1-2804a22d6e8c
If the final livery is white, it would be excellent for the graffiti artists to turn into a mobile gallery
     
     
  #5143  
Old Posted May 3, 2018, 8:13 PM
M00dy M00dy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 136
Are they in discussions with Alstom to provide the vehicles, or was this literally a "this is what an LRT car looks like!" event?
     
     
  #5144  
Old Posted May 3, 2018, 8:34 PM
Express691 Express691 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by M00dy View Post
Are they in discussions with Alstom to provide the vehicles, or was this literally a "this is what an LRT car looks like!" event?
More like the latter

Here's my album on flickr

https://www.flickr.com/photos/little-transitboy/albums/72157668530835418
     
     
  #5145  
Old Posted May 3, 2018, 9:58 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,712
Thanks.

Not really a fan of the low floor LRTs because of the big boxes in the carriage to accommodate the wheels
(and steps up to seats over those wheels).
     
     
  #5146  
Old Posted May 4, 2018, 7:26 AM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Thanks.

Not really a fan of the low floor LRTs because of the big boxes in the carriage to accommodate the wheels
(and steps up to seats over those wheels).
Sacrifice they gotta make for the sake of accessibility.
     
     
  #5147  
Old Posted May 4, 2018, 12:25 PM
M00dy M00dy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Express691 View Post
That's pretty funny.

Thanks for the photos
     
     
  #5148  
Old Posted May 4, 2018, 1:08 PM
Rico Rico is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
https://www.peacearchnews.com/news/lrt-car-being-showcased-for-first-time-in-surrey-today/

The trains will run in their own separate lane that will be unaffected by traffic, but still have to obey stop signs and traffic signals.

Hhmmm make of that what you will. Still, don't have a definitive answer on that or do we?
I really hope that is just very poorly worded, if they don't have strong signal priority it will be time to get out the pitch forks. I am trying not to hate the King George /104TH LRT (note the Fraser hwy line better be Skytrain) but not having strong singal priority would be a deal breaker....that stupid intersection at King George/104th is not helping either. That will be the choke point for the whole line, add a couple hundred million extra to the 1.65 billion and deal with it.
     
     
  #5149  
Old Posted May 4, 2018, 4:23 PM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,964
Hey ladies,

If you are really for or against this project, make your voice heard:

https://translink.checkbox.ca/Ten-Year-Vision-Community-Survey.aspx

I don't care what the opinions are however I do think that it is important to give feedback. They ask about raising fares and property taxes as well. So make sure you insert your opinions to our government much like you do here .
     
     
  #5150  
Old Posted May 4, 2018, 6:59 PM
KPELLY KPELLY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by scryer View Post
Hey ladies,

If you are really for or against this project, make your voice heard:

https://translink.checkbox.ca/Ten-Year-Vision-Community-Survey.aspx

I don't care what the opinions are however I do think that it is important to give feedback. They ask about raising fares and property taxes as well. So make sure you insert your opinions to our government much like you do here .
Done. Thanks for posting.
     
     
  #5151  
Old Posted May 4, 2018, 7:05 PM
svlt svlt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by scryer View Post
Hey ladies,

If you are really for or against this project, make your voice heard:

https://translink.checkbox.ca/Ten-Year-Vision-Community-Survey.aspx

I don't care what the opinions are however I do think that it is important to give feedback. They ask about raising fares and property taxes as well. So make sure you insert your opinions to our government much like you do here .
Thanks for sharing. It's a very short survey and would encourage everyone interested in providing input to how regional transportation is built here to spend 5 minutes to put in their two cents.
     
     
  #5152  
Old Posted May 5, 2018, 2:06 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by scryer View Post
If you are really for or against this project, make your voice heard
Thanks for the heads up. My comment:

Quote:
I rated the necessity of the Surrey LRT line as "moderate" because I feel that at-grade LRT is a poor, short-sighted solution for mobility in Surrey. I strongly feel that it's the worst of both worlds - it will cost close to a grade separated system but perform (in terms of speed, frequency and passenger volumes) close to a much cheaper bus rapid transit system with dedicated lanes.
     
     
  #5153  
Old Posted May 5, 2018, 11:31 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Another better pic from the Province (not backlit):


The City of Surrey unveiled a Light Rapid Transit vehicle on Wednesday, May 2, 2018, to show residents "an example of the wide selection of light rail cars available for LRT projects," according to a release. PNG
http://theprovince.com/news/local-news/m...wcm/54e6767c-8d8a-43d1-b0e1-2804a22d6e8c
I'm sold! ... by the Skytrain in the background, that looks great for extending out to Langley

In all seriousness, I just sent my comment as well.

I am not against the Newton LRT, but I highly recommend that if they are going to invest this much money into the project, at least tunnel the short segment between King George Station and Surrey Central Station, where the alignment is a complete mess in its current proposed forms.

Also, it seems that they have committed themselves to LRT for Langley. This was done very sneakily IMO. It slowly went from "future rail transit" to a mix of that term and "LRT" to it straight out being labelled as "LRT along Fraser Highway."

I am quite angry that there were no true public consultations or open houses regarding this Line's technology choice.

We really need to speak up against this now.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q

Last edited by Metro-One; May 5, 2018 at 1:28 PM.
     
     
  #5154  
Old Posted May 7, 2018, 2:27 AM
Firebrand's Avatar
Firebrand Firebrand is offline
D-Class Suburbanite
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I am quite angry that there were no true public consultations or open houses regarding this Line's technology choice.

We really need to speak up against this now.
Even if they do “public consultations”, they will be meaningless as they already decided the path they’re taking. They seem to brush the criticisms from their shoulders from people pointing out obvious flaws of the Surrey LRT (no grade separation on the KGB-104 Ave intersection, Surrey-Langley being LRT and not SkyTrain etc).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
I really do hate being right.
I commented on Peace Arch News’ claim about the SNG LRT not having traffic signal priority on a Facebook post, and someone said “do your own research. Don’t read news or Facebook posts.” I haven’t heard news officially from TransLink about the LRT getting traffic signal priority.

Last edited by Firebrand; May 7, 2018 at 2:28 AM. Reason: Spelling error
     
     
  #5155  
Old Posted May 7, 2018, 3:21 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebrand View Post
I commented on Peace Arch News’ claim about the SNG LRT not having traffic signal priority on a Facebook post, and someone said “do your own research. Don’t read news or Facebook posts.” I haven’t heard news officially from TransLink about the LRT getting traffic signal priority.
From the Phase Two Investment Plan Discussion Guide linked to on the Buzzer Blog:
Quote:
The line will operate within dedicated train-only lanes on the road. Along with modern intersection signal optimization technology, this will allow the trains to bypass traffic queues and provide efficient and reliable service.
     
     
  #5156  
Old Posted May 7, 2018, 3:55 AM
Firebrand's Avatar
Firebrand Firebrand is offline
D-Class Suburbanite
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 590
So basically the author of the Peace Arch News article is either lying or there are no exact details in how the signal prioritization will work. (Emphasis on exact.)
     
     
  #5157  
Old Posted May 7, 2018, 4:26 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebrand View Post
So basically the author of the Peace Arch News article is either lying or there are no exact details in how the signal prioritization will work. (Emphasis on exact.)
Probably both...
     
     
  #5158  
Old Posted May 11, 2018, 2:54 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
clueless

it seems you don't need a vehicle to be clueless about approaching trains

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmzhvKM-d8I

btw: notice the train has an ad for the local hospital?
i don't think the darwin awards have a special category for irony
     
     
  #5159  
Old Posted May 11, 2018, 3:11 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
before anyone asks, apparently the celphone and the tram were undamaged
     
     
  #5160  
Old Posted May 11, 2018, 4:49 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,151
The scarier ones are the ones who DO see the LRV and try and fail to beat it... or if they do, they get creamed by the one coming in the other direction. This isn't Frogger people, trains don't brake as fast as cars and buses do.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:42 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.