HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Based on options for Broadway Corridor Study, what is your preferred choice?
BRT: Commercial to UBC 25 6.16%
LRT A: Commercial to UBC OR Commercial via VCC to UBC 31 7.64%
LRT B: Main St. to UBC AND Commercial to UBC 18 4.43%
RRT: Commercial to UBC OR VCC to UBC 283 69.70%
COMBO: RRT to Arbutus/LRT to Main St via Arbutus 39 9.61%
BUS: Enhanced Bus Service for all buses to UBC 10 2.46%
Voters: 406. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8821  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2018, 2:34 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
I have been re-thinking my suggestion of a few months ago, of running the UBC extension west from Alma using the Jericho Lands site to get to 4th Ave / Chancellor Blvd to get the line running north-south from the Chan Center to Thunderbird Stadium

A similar route would continue west from Broadway & Alma under Broadway which curves and becomes 8th Ave. Where 8th Ave runs beside the Jericho Lands, an underground station can be built to accommodate the new housing that will be developed there. Continuing westwards, the line runs under 8th Ave and becomes the disconnected piece of Chancellor Blvd. This segment conveniently lines up with the main route of Chancellor Blvd after it connects with 4th ave.

The line continues westwards under Chancellor Blvd to enter the campus from the North, lining up with either Wesbrook Mall, Main Mall, or East Mall. At this point, the line would run South to a terminal at the Thunderbird Sports Center, the stadium, or 16th ave.

I am guessing the UBC stations could be at or near the Chan Center, the SUB, the abandoned bus loops (which will likely be redeveloped), the Sports complex, or Wesbrook village housing (not all of the above)

With a station at the Jericho lands development, the new condo units being built there could be built with self-contained “student flats” as part of each unit to encourage the owners to rent them out to UBC (or even SFU) students, since these universities will be readily accessed by the nearby M-line subway.

Last edited by jsbertram; Apr 21, 2018 at 2:44 AM.
     
     
  #8822  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2018, 2:48 AM
paradigm4 paradigm4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram View Post
just was thinking....

is the recent translink / mayors council funding announced for the remaining 20% local funding specific to the projects in the current 10 year plan?

or will this revenue be available afterwards for future projects like UBC extension phase II? and langley RRT?
The recent announcement is only phase two of the 10 year plan. only has funding for skytrain to arbutus and first phase of surrey lrt.
     
     
  #8823  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2018, 4:08 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,590
I doubt any students will be afford the rent for condos in Jericho.
     
     
  #8824  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2018, 5:29 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
Nor will they want/need a line routed down Chancellor, which only serves the Chan Centre, the Museum of Anthropology and a lot of faculty housing. University Boulevard is in a better position to serve everybody (not to mention a potential station at Block F).
     
     
  #8825  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2018, 5:53 AM
NewfBC NewfBC is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Surely there is an upper limit to what the Feds and Province will cover. They can't issue blanket statements that will could cost hundreds of millions.

A YVR-style addfare sounds like a good solution for this.
Who will pay the add fare? All of the students and staff have passes. There won't be any add fare applicable. With YVR there are many visitors and occasional travelers paying the add fare.

Ron.
     
     
  #8826  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2018, 6:30 AM
waves's Avatar
waves waves is offline
waves
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 382
Chancellor Blvd is too far North, but having the line utilize the old Chancellor Boulevard and cut off into College Highroad and then under the New Bus loop wood make a lot of sense.

Here were a bunch of options I was thinking of:

Diamonds are grade transitions, Stars are potential Terminus Stations, Circles are potential non-terminus stations, Black Lines are potential routes, the Yellow line was an option I had from a few years ago. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1FhwW_oU9MFAOHbpk-cWK6R1tBFo&usp=sharing
     
     
  #8827  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2018, 2:45 PM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,964
Firstly: I am absolutely thrilled that UBC is willing to contribute to the extension all the way to UBC. I feel like this validates what everyone on the forum has been saying since the beginning of time: that the Millennium line needs to be extended to UBC to solve our transit woes.

Secondly at some point I think that we should put more serious thought into switching to a cut-and-cover method to constructing the tunnel further west. We have to start finding a way to cut costs. I was just in Rome, and they are currently doing a cut-and-cover strategy to connect Metro Lines B and C at the Colosseum station. Let me tell you: the Colosseum is one of the most visited places in the world and the city feels that they need to interrupt plenty of businesses to get it done. So we can afford to do a cut-and-cover starting somewhere towards the western side of Broadway. However I am not entirely sure where this would be?

Thirdly, to save more costs, we are gonna need the Skytrain to elevate once again. I strongly think that we are going to dip into some huge deficits if the Skytrain is underground the entire way to UBC. The NIMBYS need to shut up and understand that the city needs this extension not to cost the city and province an arm and a leg to get it done. I would say that a decent spot for elevation would be at University BLVD as you already have a similar layout to what we see when we have street with Skytrain. That's just me, I am no expert though.
     
     
  #8828  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2018, 6:36 PM
Plafuldog Plafuldog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 15
Doesn't the Musqueam own the University Golf Club? Assumedly, they would chip in some money as well, at least enough to pay for their own station. Perhaps that could replace a station at Sasamat and save the project $50m.
     
     
  #8829  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2018, 9:25 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plafuldog View Post
Doesn't the Musqueam own the University Golf Club? Assumedly, they would chip in some money as well, at least enough to pay for their own station. Perhaps that could replace a station at Sasamat and save the project $50m.
Sorry, that loud noise you heard was me snorting with laughter. You made my day!
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #8830  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2018, 9:27 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plafuldog View Post
Doesn't the Musqueam own the University Golf Club? Assumedly, they would chip in some money as well, at least enough to pay for their own station. Perhaps that could replace a station at Sasamat and save the project $50m.
They do, but if I recall from AMS Council meetings back in the day, they aren't going to develop it until 2025 or 2030.

Although, who knows how set in stone that date is.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
     
     
  #8831  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2018, 10:22 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
I doubt any students will be afford the rent for condos in Jericho.
I disagree. I'm certain that many would choose the location for its proximity to campus, beaches, parks, and (hopefully) rapid transit. Whether a place is shared among roommates, paid for by parents, or even just accept it as the cost of housing in Vancouver and roll it into their educational debt.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
     
     
  #8832  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2018, 1:12 AM
invisibleairwaves's Avatar
invisibleairwaves invisibleairwaves is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
I disagree. I'm certain that many would choose the location for its proximity to campus, beaches, parks, and (hopefully) rapid transit. Whether a place is shared among roommates, paid for by parents, or even just accept it as the cost of housing in Vancouver and roll it into their educational debt.
I'm sure a lot of students would like to choose it for those reasons. They'd also like to live in Shaughnessy or West Point Grey or on the endowment lands themselves for the same reasons. Doesn't mean it's realistic for a kid fresh out of high school with parents who aren't millionaires.
__________________
Reticulating Splines
     
     
  #8833  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2018, 1:13 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
Perhaps UBC or the City could build some student apartments? Guaranteed revenue for any coffee or sushi place that moves in.
     
     
  #8834  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2018, 2:05 AM
invisibleairwaves's Avatar
invisibleairwaves invisibleairwaves is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 638
Jericho simply isn't going to have affordable student housing. Period. The wealthiest, most politically-connected NIMBYs in the province surround the Jericho lands and they are never going to allow it. It makes all kinds of planning sense, especially if the M-line goes out that way, but it's a total non-starter.
__________________
Reticulating Splines
     
     
  #8835  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2018, 4:07 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
We recently elected a councillor who proposes widespread upzoning throughout the city (including Point Grey), and most of this year's candidates are suggesting much of the same. You never know.
     
     
  #8836  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2018, 4:10 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by invisibleairwaves View Post
Jericho simply isn't going to have affordable student housing. Period. The wealthiest, most politically-connected NIMBYs in the province surround the Jericho lands and they are never going to allow it. It makes all kinds of planning sense, especially if the M-line goes out that way, but it's a total non-starter.
You forget that the Jericho Lands were bought by First Nations - they can do pretty much whatever they want.
     
     
  #8837  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2018, 5:13 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
You forget that the Jericho Lands were bought by First Nations - they can do pretty much whatever they want.
Not really. Along with Canada Lands Company and it seems that they are totally engaged with going through a City of Vancouver rezoning process.
     
     
  #8838  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2018, 3:01 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram View Post
the yvr add-fare allows free travel on that segment, no? since YVR chipped in to build this segment
maybe the same idea of free travel on campus for ubc?
I think so but I'm not sure how it all works with compass card gates. It was the original plan for long term parking transport when YVR builds out a little more.

I agree a similar concept would be perfect for UBC.
     
     
  #8839  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2018, 3:02 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewfBC View Post
Who will pay the add fare? All of the students and staff have passes. There won't be any add fare applicable. With YVR there are many visitors and occasional travelers paying the add fare.

Ron.
I wondered further up the thread if UBC could have a more expensive UPass, that would cover it.
     
     
  #8840  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2018, 3:04 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,543
The whole idea of this line is that students won't have to live on campus, or even the west side. They can live in Surrey and east can basement suites like the rest of the starving students.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:58 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.