HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #12141  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 3:12 AM
gymratmanaz gymratmanaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,933
So do I get the impression that this actually has the legs to happen?.... based on the developer's history.?
     
     
  #12142  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 3:15 AM
biggus diggus biggus diggus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,838
Developer has credentials but it seems like they may be asking for quite the concession (in the form of Herberger land and 3rd street frontage) before they'd be willing to build it.
     
     
  #12143  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 3:37 AM
ASU Diablo ASU Diablo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by gymratmanaz View Post
So do I get the impression that this actually has the legs to happen?.... based on the developer's history.?
As of now, the condo tower appears to be closer to being developed. The rest of the entertainment district all appears to be in the early stages
     
     
  #12144  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 4:48 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,513
So, regarding Colliers. I walked by last night and the pad does not look very large to accommodate the proposed 2nd tower if it is orientated width-wise from East to West. It looks like the tower would have to be built in a North/South direction to fit. I don't know much about the Colliers development as I was not living here at the time it was built. I did check a Google satellite view and this confirms to me the tower could not fit in the orientation shown in the rendering.

Would this plan entail demolition of some of the current structure? Was that always part of the plan or was a 2nd tower originally proposed to be in a North/South orientation when Colliers was originally built?

     
     
  #12145  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 5:01 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,467
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonnieFoos View Post
So, regarding Colliers. I walked by last night and the pad does not look very large to accommodate the proposed 2nd tower if it is orientated width-wise from East to West. It looks like the tower would have to be built in a North/South direction to fit. I don't know much about the Colliers development as I was not living here at the time it was built. I did check a Google satellite view and this confirms to me the tower could not fit in the orientation shown in the rendering.

Would this plan entail demolition of some of the current structure? Was that always part of the plan or was a 2nd tower originally proposed to be in a North/South orientation when Colliers was originally built?
The original Collier Center II was proposed with an East/west orientation:


http://www.historyadventuring.com/2016/03/unfinished-business-in-phoenix-arizona.html

I don't know what this proposal would entail.
     
     
  #12146  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 5:02 PM
biggus diggus biggus diggus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,838
My guess is in the rendering the building appears wider than it is for viewing purposes. The actual footprint of the new build would line up with the shape of the pad if you factor in the parking garage behind a small tower.
     
     
  #12147  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 5:34 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggus diggus View Post
My guess is in the rendering the building appears wider than it is for viewing purposes. The actual footprint of the new build would line up with the shape of the pad if you factor in the parking garage behind a small tower.
So, it looks like the existing structure may already be designed to support a tower. There's no way that tower in the rendering would fit East/West in that lot or it would be one skinny tower at just half of the BOA Tower width.

Honestly, I would rather them demo the 2nd level mall portion and develop a street level design, but I don't know how much that would increase the cost of the development if the foundations are already in place for the tower.
     
     
  #12148  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 5:49 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,513
Ok, so after seeing the rendering that BD posted, I see that outlines on the current 2nd level structure that would have accommodated the original proposed 2nd tower. I edited the Google image I posted above to show how the tower would have fit in. So I would think that no matter what the 2nd tower design, the 2nd story mall portion will most likely stay there.

     
     
  #12149  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 6:18 PM
biggus diggus biggus diggus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,838
That's accurate, and then the parking garage behind it would fill up the remainder of the space.
     
     
  #12150  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 9:47 PM
ASU Diablo ASU Diablo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,505
See what is landing in Alice Cooper’stown former restaurant space in Phoenix

Well safe to say the JSED is "officially" dead? old Cooperstown location being leased to Equality Health. Landlord chose this business over proposed restaurants/bars. More than ever, I want to see the Hine's development get some traction.

https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news...see-what-is-landing-in-alice-cooper.html
     
     
  #12151  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 10:01 PM
biggus diggus biggus diggus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,838
I would choose that business over a food and beverage tenant, also.
     
     
  #12152  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2018, 12:01 AM
Phxguy Phxguy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,189
On the topic of business, drove through downtown real quick and noticed a 'coming soon' sign up for Zooks sandwiches in a long vacant retail space on Washington between Kaleidoscope juice and Monarch Theater. Also, looks like a shop called The Grateful Shop is opening up where the State Farm office was on Central next to Deli Tavern.
     
     
  #12153  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2018, 12:18 AM
jward145 jward145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 22
     
     
  #12154  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2018, 12:23 AM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CA/AZ Nomad
Posts: 7,454
I don't get why they didn't do what every other developer did which is approach the city in secret and get an RFP written that only they can answer to--that's how CityScape happened with its consumption of another public asset, Patriots Square Park.

Maybe Phoenix has grown up and/or they realized that the process wouldn't fly with such a large chunk of dirt at stake, so they came up with this unsolicited proposal process..
     
     
  #12155  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2018, 12:59 AM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CA/AZ Nomad
Posts: 7,454
Also: here's the site plan for collier center today.

http://www.reddevelopment.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Collier-Center_Site-Plan_120417-Plot-1.pdf

Might indicate if there's some room for the tower to go on top of existing development. Not sure how that would work out. They very well could have put support columns going all the way to the roof of the 2 story development for further costruction.
     
     
  #12156  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2018, 1:31 AM
ASUSunDevil ASUSunDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 952
Quote:
Originally Posted by jward145 View Post
"I think for a great city, it has to be well planned," she said. "Right now, we're not there."

What an awful quote. We're not there because 76 yr old dinosaurs like Thelma Williams have no vision, yet are still trusted to make decisions.

i think the visionaries will win out on this project, eventually.
     
     
  #12157  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2018, 1:35 AM
biggus diggus biggus diggus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,838
So you're in favor of selling an asset you didn't plan to sell (in this case the south convention center building) on short notice the first time an unsolicited offer comes your way?
     
     
  #12158  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2018, 1:55 AM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CA/AZ Nomad
Posts: 7,454
^ This is exactly it.

Selling the South Building would directly kick in the nuts every effort Phoenix has made into building the Convention Center into a world-class destination, including the $600 million the city and state spent on the North and West building.

There are a million vacant lots that could be redeveloped into the whatever the developer is proposing--unless the developer is proposing convention space which we haven't heard of.

There is no reason to raze it for condos/apartments/entertainment/retail/hotel/office/etc. The convention center is there to seed those things, not be replaced by them.

Lastly, selling off the South Building without any due diligence could invoke retribution from the state. The facility is old but it's not obsolete or hemorrhaging money. It was renovated with the state and city money.
     
     
  #12159  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2018, 2:00 AM
ASUSunDevil ASUSunDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 952
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggus diggus View Post
So you're in favor of selling an asset you didn't plan to sell (in this case the south convention center building) on short notice the first time an unsolicited offer comes your way?
Get to work on solutions with Hines before you publicly tell developers to 'slow their roll' in regards to ambitious projects Downtown.
     
     
  #12160  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2018, 2:25 AM
biggus diggus biggus diggus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,838
There's some editorializing in the azcentral article you read.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:24 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.