HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #12801  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 6:49 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,476
Hainan upgauge

Hainan already upgauging their upcoming new YVR-TSN-SZX route to a 789 from a 788 from 28 Oct.

Launch in May will be a 788 until then.

https://www.routesonline.com/news/38/air...w18-shenzhen-long-haul-aircraft-changes/

Some people certainly seem to be sad a lot on this forum. Smile, get outside and do something active it'll make you feel better!
     
     
  #12802  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 1:53 PM
thenoflyzone thenoflyzone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post
Hainan already upgauging their upcoming new YVR-TSN-SZX route to a 789 from a 788 from 28 Oct.

Launch in May will be a 788 until then.

https://www.routesonline.com/news/38/air...w18-shenzhen-long-haul-aircraft-changes/
Makes sense. The 788 is the most premium heavy config aircraft in their fleet. They use them to LHR, JFK, BRU, MEX, etc

The B789 is better suited for Canada-China.
     
     
  #12803  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 3:28 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpine View Post
I wonder if the dominance of the Shinkansen has something to do with it. Out of the 30.1 million trips between the Tokyo and Nagoya areas in 2015-16, only about 600,000 or so were by plane; Shinkansen has a 92.9% market share in that corridor (calculated from this spreadsheet of Japanese government data and some fiddling in Excel).
Well, that's partly because people just don't fly when they can take the train and be downtown-downtown in 90 minutes. That being said, Shinkansen is not connected to either airport... so transferring is still annoying.
Quote:
Maybe direct flights to NGO just can't compete with mainline flights to NRT/HND and taking a Shinkansen to Nagoya. The same thing happened to HND-SDJ flights after the Tohoku Shinkansen started in 1982.
Yes... but again, Sendai is really close to Tokyo... and it doesn't make sense (even with Japan's crazy efficient bus-like airline service, it's still less convenient). Also, Japanese people are culturally accustomed to paying extra for convenience and it's hard to argue that.

However, in both these cases... flying and then transferring to Shinkansen is really inconvenient.... particularly if you're flying on AC or JL... which only fly YVR-NRT (AC had a YVR-HND flight, but didn't stick it out and now ANA has that flight). Particularly keeping in mind that flights into HND are mostly evening flights... which means by the time you actually get to your destination after transferring to local train, then bullet train, then local train again is probably unreasonably late.

Quote:
And now, with the Hokkaido Shinkansen crossing the Seikan Tunnel and reaching Hakodate, the HND-AOJ (JAL used to fly 6x roundtrips daily between Haneda and Aomori) and HND-HKD markets have vanished; why fly when you can take the train directly? Currently, Haneda-New Chitose (Sapporo) is the busiest airline route in the world; wait until the Hokkaido Shinkansen reaches Sapporo in 2031 and you might see the Haneda-Sapporo route shrink dramatically.
I don't think you'll see HND-CTS shrink that much, to be honest. The Hokkaido Shinkansen will still be 4–5 hours, which is much longer than the Tokaido line, which is 2h 30m and TYO–OSA still flights leaving every hour (mostly HND-ITM, with 3x HND-KIX). In addition, two LCCs operate another 6–7 flights between the less convenient airports KIX and NRT.


I think the REAL disruptor will be the Chuo Maglev Line which is slated to open in 2027 between Shinagawa and Nagoya. That will decrease the Nagoya–Tokyo trip to 40 minutes.


I think this has some PRETTY serious implications for NGO, to be honest. It will be almost faster to take the train to Shinagawa in Tokyo (40 minutes ) than to take the train to NGO Airport ( 35 minutes away ).

So, if you're in Nagoya, you could legitimately choose to fly out of HND or NGO. HND essentially becomes another airport option for Nagoyans. Conversely, NGO would be closer to West Tokyo than Narita. The FASTEST train between Shinagawa(Tokyo) and NRT is currently 80 minutes. You could probably get to NGO in 75 minutes.
     
     
  #12804  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 7:35 PM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenoflyzone View Post
Makes sense. The 788 is the most premium heavy config aircraft in their fleet. They use them to LHR, JFK, BRU, MEX, etc

The B789 is better suited for Canada-China.
Hainan’s 4 long haul types range from 30 - 36 J class only. They are not a premium heavy airline to begin with. The change from 788 to 789 is a big jump in overall seats not a significant change in J at all. Plus the YVR route gets their newest product instead of the older A330s. That’s a very positive sign.
     
     
  #12805  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 7:58 PM
thenoflyzone thenoflyzone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post
Hainan’s 4 long haul types range from 30 - 36 J class only. They are not a premium heavy airline to begin with. The change from 788 to 789 is a big jump in overall seats not a significant change in J at all. Plus the YVR route gets their newest product instead of the older A330s. That’s a very positive sign.
Sure, but that doesn't mean HU can't play around with it's fleet to send the right aircraft to the right destination.

A B788 with 36J/177Y is a pretty lean aircraft across the Pacific, and not well suited for a lot of destinations.
     
     
  #12806  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2018, 9:22 PM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenoflyzone View Post
Sure, but that doesn't mean HU can't play around with it's fleet to send the right aircraft to the right destination.

A B788 with 36J/177Y is a pretty lean aircraft across the Pacific, and not well suited for a lot of destinations.
I think we can all agree that, outside YYZ, Canada is not a large premium market. YVR’s isn’t actually that bad for a small population base but would be way down the list on a global scale.

I’m just saying in this particular case I doubt their decision was based on J seats. The 333 has the exact same number of seats but only 4 more J. The big positive is YVR is getting one of the planes from their newest fleet. YVR seems to be doing better lately attracting newer fleet types. YVR used to get the bottom of the barrel stuff!

Last edited by Johnny Aussie; Apr 5, 2018 at 8:26 PM.
     
     
  #12807  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2018, 8:54 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vagabond View Post
This could be equally applicable to CXH as YVR, but Harbour Air has applied to fly international.
Harbour Air and Kenmore Air will operate CXH-LKE-KEH starting Apr 26.

http://vancouversun.com/business/local-b...-to-seattle-nerd-bird-set-to-take-flight
     
     
  #12808  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2018, 10:40 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
Harbour Air and Kenmore Air will operate CXH-LKE-KEH starting Apr 26.

http://vancouversun.com/business/local-b...-to-seattle-nerd-bird-set-to-take-flight
What is interesting is just how many customers/immigration points the region will have. Downtown Vancouver will now three locations where customs clearance happen (Canada Place, Pacific Central Station and now this terminal). Add on to that all the cargo terminals (but with far fewer people on those ships).
     
     
  #12809  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2018, 6:23 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,085
Effective Oct 28, PR will start direct MNL-JFK. MNL-YVR terminator will become daily while MNL-YVR-JFK will be cancelled.

So CX will once again be the only operator for YVR-JFK.
     
     
  #12810  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2018, 7:56 PM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
Effective Oct 28, PR will start direct MNL-JFK. MNL-YVR terminator will become daily while MNL-YVR-JFK will be cancelled.

So CX will once again be the only operator for YVR-JFK.
Was expecting that earlier actually... August was the original estimate.

Don't forget DL runs its seasonal summer daily YVR-JFK as well.

The daily PR 77W will sit on the ground in YVR from 1440 until 0045.

If you saw that on airlineroute.net you should cite the source.

https://www.routesonline.com/news/38/air...stop-new-york-jfk-service-from-oct-2018/
     
     
  #12811  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2018, 8:06 PM
excel excel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post
Was expecting that earlier actually... August was the original estimate.

Don't forget DL runs its seasonal summer daily YVR-JFK as well.

The daily PR 77W will sit on the ground in YVR from 1440 until 0045.

If you saw that on airlineroute.net you should cite the source.

https://www.routesonline.com/news/38/air...stop-new-york-jfk-service-from-oct-2018/
What aircraft does DL operate to JFK?
     
     
  #12812  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2018, 12:13 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,085
Oh, didn't see it was posted when I was typing that post...
     
     
  #12813  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2018, 1:29 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by excel View Post
what aircraft does dl operate to jfk?
737-900er
     
     
  #12814  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2018, 2:02 AM
thenoflyzone thenoflyzone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,310
Now that PR will start non stop MNL-JFK, makes no sense to operate YVR-JFK (like CX does).

They were not drawing enough O&D to make the route stick around.

No alliance, inferior J class product compared to AC and CX, no lie-flat seats on certain frames, etc. They were probably losing tons of money on the route. It's no surprise it will be discontinued.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post

The daily PR 77W will sit on the ground in YVR from 1440 until 0045.
They are apparently interested in launching ORD and IAH, via YVR. Whether they would make money on these routes, now that's a different story entirely.

Last edited by thenoflyzone; Apr 9, 2018 at 2:26 AM.
     
     
  #12815  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2018, 2:29 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenoflyzone View Post
They are interested in launching ORD and IAH, via YVR. Timings would work with a bit of tweaking. Whether they would make money on these routes, now that's a different story entirely.
They've definitely built in enough fat in the schedule to allow a new destination from YVR. IAH, ORD, LAS (again), SAN all being thrown around as possibilities.

IAH and ORD would be a tough turnaround with the current schedule even with just one hour turns at YVR X2 and ORD/IAH. LAS and SAN easy.
     
     
  #12816  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2018, 6:45 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,063
we need a cheat sheet so some of these posts make sense to those who don't understand airplane geek speak

what is CX and PR? or ORD or IAH etc.
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #12817  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2018, 7:31 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
we need a cheat sheet so some of these posts make sense to those who don't understand airplane geek speak

what is CX and PR? or ORD or IAH etc.
Oh god I know it's ridiculous! It makes no sense. Especially airport codes that don't at all resemble the city name. I don't know what the fascination is in memorizing airport codes. Maybe they're pretending they are pilots lol
     
     
  #12818  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2018, 9:03 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,476
I always wondered where YYZ is?

Yayzoo City?
     
     
  #12819  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2018, 11:59 AM
thenoflyzone thenoflyzone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
we need a cheat sheet so some of these posts make sense to those who don't understand airplane geek speak

what is CX and PR? or ORD or IAH etc.
"What" is easy. "Why" is another matter entirely.

CX is Cathay Pacific. They couldn't use CP as that belonged to Canadian Pacific Airlines back in 1942, 4 years before Cathay Pacific was founded.
PR is Philippine Airlines. They couldn't use PA as that belonged to Pan Am. PA now belongs to AirBlue, a Pakistani low cost carrier. AirBlue couldn't use AB as that belonged to the now defunct Air Berlin.
ORD is the code for Chicago O'Hare, because it was originally known as "ORcharD field".
IAH is pretty obvious. "International Airport Houston".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post
I always wondered where YYZ is?

Yayzoo City?
Since Toronto has more than 1 airport, they had to be creative for the code assignement. They couldn't have just used YTO for Pearson, as that code is an area designation for all of Toronto.

As far as Toronto is concerned, YTZ is probably the only one that makes some sense. YKZ and YYZ, not so much.

YVR also makes sense. "Yes Very Rainy"...

Last edited by thenoflyzone; Apr 9, 2018 at 12:28 PM.
     
     
  #12820  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2018, 12:00 PM
thenoflyzone thenoflyzone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
Oh god I know it's ridiculous! It makes no sense. Especially airport codes that don't at all resemble the city name. I don't know what the fascination is in memorizing airport codes. Maybe they're pretending they are pilots lol
It's no fascination. Some of us are payed to know these airport codes

Once you know it, it's easier to just write the code instead of the full name, especially on aviation forums and such, where a good chunk of others know it as well.

If you dont know, a simple internet search will give you the answer. After a few months, if aviation truly interests you, you will start to memorize automatically some of these codes, especially places like ORD, or major airlines such as BA, AF, KL or CX.

Last edited by thenoflyzone; Apr 9, 2018 at 12:17 PM.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:24 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.