Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician
And I repeat: The majority of population growth in metro Chicago is in the central area of the city, even if the city proper is not growing. There is nothing to debate here. Sorry, but i believe you just aren’t understanding my point. Doing Google searches to show me stuff I already know is kind of pointless.
|
The central area is not getting the majority of the growth, although you did grow a little overall since 2010 it’s very up and down
Chicago metro 2010: 9,461,105
Chicago metro 2017:9,554,598
Change: +90,000
Chicago city 2010: 2,695,598
Chicago city 2016(couldn’t find 17): 2,704,958
Change: +9,000
What you are insinuating is incorrect
Threaded Mode