HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Based on options for Broadway Corridor Study, what is your preferred choice?
BRT: Commercial to UBC 25 6.16%
LRT A: Commercial to UBC OR Commercial via VCC to UBC 31 7.64%
LRT B: Main St. to UBC AND Commercial to UBC 18 4.43%
RRT: Commercial to UBC OR VCC to UBC 283 69.70%
COMBO: RRT to Arbutus/LRT to Main St via Arbutus 39 9.61%
BUS: Enhanced Bus Service for all buses to UBC 10 2.46%
Voters: 406. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8581  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2018, 10:52 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by cganuelas1995 View Post
It would be dumber than invading Russia in the winter...
Off-topic, but you don't want to invade Russia in the spring, either - all the snow melts and your army ends up sinking in mud. Don't invade in autumn either, because the rains will do the same thing. Basically just stay the hell away from Russia.
     
     
  #8582  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 12:13 AM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Off-topic, but you don't want to invade Russia in the spring, either - all the snow melts and your army ends up sinking in mud. Don't invade in autumn either, because the rains will do the same thing. Basically just stay the hell away from Russia.
Also, invading Russia will cause them to nuke you. That's why countries that have nukes haven't been invaded.
     
     
  #8583  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 2:50 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by cganuelas1995 View Post
Also, invading Russia will cause them to nuke you. That's why countries that have nukes haven't been invaded.
That means before we contemplate doing anything like that we need to have all of our metro systems underground. (That is the reason why Moscow metro is underground). It can be used as a bomb shelter during such events. Another justification for getting on with it and build an underground skytrain extension along Broadway.

Surrey is expendable under such conditions its system can be a surface street car.
     
     
  #8584  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 3:02 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,159
All joking aside, fear of a nuclear strike is exactly why Pyongyang has subway stations 100m deep. Moscow is also rumoured to have a secret "Metro-2" system exclusively for the Kremlin and other government/military sties.

Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
That means before we contemplate doing anything like that we need to have all of our metro systems underground. (That is the reason why Moscow metro is underground). It can be used as a bomb shelter during such events. Another justification for getting on with it and build an underground skytrain extension along Broadway.

Surrey is expendable under such conditions its system can be a surface street car.
Ah, but remember the fact that we're in Canada - there's nothing worth bombing here!
     
     
  #8585  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 10:40 AM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
That means before we contemplate doing anything like that we need to have all of our metro systems underground. (That is the reason why Moscow metro is underground). It can be used as a bomb shelter during such events. Another justification for getting on with it and build an underground skytrain extension along Broadway.

Surrey is expendable under such conditions its system can be a surface street car.
#nukesurrey
     
     
  #8586  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 2:17 PM
Reecemartin's Avatar
Reecemartin Reecemartin is offline
YouTube Creator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 1,776
[Deleted]

Last edited by Reecemartin; Nov 18, 2020 at 1:18 AM.
     
     
  #8587  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 6:09 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,901
As exciting as the announcement is, it is so disappointing to see it end at Arbutus. Just stupid, what specifically is there? It is just going to push the bus line-ups further west. It should at least have gone to Alma where it would be within walking distance of whatever gets developed on the Jericho Lands.
     
     
  #8588  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 7:09 PM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
As exciting as the announcement is, it is so disappointing to see it end at Arbutus. Just stupid, what specifically is there? It is just going to push the bus line-ups further west. It should at least have gone to Alma where it would be within walking distance of whatever gets developed on the Jericho Lands.
I really think they should have the first phase go just one more station West to Macdonald St. as it would catch that last bit of density along the Broadway corridor in that area of Kits. before UBC. There's a number of rental developments under construction in that area right now.

I believe Translink would like UBC to at least partially pay for the extension through the endowment lands which is why the phased approach as they have no intention to at this point.

As for Arbutus that's where the last of the commercial density ends along the Broadway corridor. Arbutus to Macdonald is a dead zone for both residential and commercial density but it picks back up once you get to Macdonald with new buildings going up to 5 floors I believe to Alma.
     
     
  #8589  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 7:56 PM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
As exciting as the announcement is, it is so disappointing to see it end at Arbutus. Just stupid, what specifically is there? It is just going to push the bus line-ups further west. It should at least have gone to Alma where it would be within walking distance of whatever gets developed on the Jericho Lands.
From Arbutus to UBC is double the distance, and close to 50% of the traffic along the 99B-line bus exits between Main Street and Arbutus.

More importantly, the scope of the project and pre-construction work and funding analysis has all been done as far as Arbutus. Changing the scope to go all the way to UBC at this point would result in further delays and another conversation about how to fund it.
     
     
  #8590  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 8:28 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,700
Belately weighing in on the Phase 2 funding announcement...

I am relieved that the funding impasse has been alleviated and frustrated that after all the delays and fighting it came down to fares, property taxes, and DCC/Ls to fund it. Why couldn't we just get there 19 years ago and just fund Translink with existing tools? I know, I know, Translink was created with a concomitant promose of new funding tools, but holy hell, it's taken a long time to throw in the towel on that.

The good:

-Very pleased that there is a way forward now to fund the local share of the Millennium Line Broadway Extension.

When the RFI->RFQ->RFP stages are drafted, I damn well hope that it is written into the terms of reference that the line must be designed for a westward continuation past Arbutus and that the design solution must be able to ensure that service on the rest of the line is uninterrupted while the UBC phase is built.

-Very happy, too, that substantial bus service enhancement is part of the package, including close to a million additional service hours and additional B-Lines.

-Happy that the funding is being spread to development cost charges. I would be pleased to see this expand to a statutory TIF district around existing stations and, particularly, those planned for future.

The bad:

-I am disappointed that the Surrey LRT is going to be built at this time. I would have much rather preferred that the right of way and stations were built and operated with B-Line buses for the next 10-15 years. This would have provided within 1 minute of the same travel time as the LRT plan, attract just about the same number of riders, and cost far, far less. The right of way is the thing and a well designed BRT system - which still should have been part of this funding package - would have included reservations for all catanery, transformer, and associated electrical infrastructure along the line to drastically simplify the upgrade to rail in the future. It should have also bought the land for the LRT storage and maintenence yard that could be used as a bus barn in the intervening years.

Furthermore, it is the *planning* for rapid transit that fires the starting gun on redevelopment and the pace of change is such that a BRT system could very easily take up the additional ridership as the corridors are re-planned, re-zoned, and developed.

As I see it, an upgrade to LRT should have been Phase 3, along with the Millennium Line UBC extension and the Expo Line extension to Langley along Fraser Highway.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
     
     
  #8591  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 8:47 PM
Hot Rod's Avatar
Hot Rod Hot Rod is offline
Big City Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle-Vancouver-Osaka-Chongqing-Chicago-OKC
Posts: 1,187
^ your thoughts make total sense to me, particularly since they are stopping short on the MLine extension. Appears to me that the $ spent on the Light Rail now crowd could do the MLine correctly all the way (with UBC picking up some $$ too) while BRT is implemented in Surrey and everything else you said that good urban planners should be doing.

Rather - in order to get the MLine extended at all we have to be held hostage to politics SoF since the way this is set up we need their 'vote' of confidence to even consider such an otherwise necessary metro expansion.

I'd rather take Translink out of it completely and do a true Regional Transit district that is NOT made up of local mayors but instead appointed by the Providence. If we had that then MLine would already be subway out to UBC years ago, RAV line would have been a proper subway and not stopped at Richmond City Center but continued at least into Richmond city if not Steveston, and today we'd be talking about Expo Line extensions and North Shore metro rail options; instead were 30-40 years behind and have to placate the little suburbs to even get a necessary backbone to the region's transit on the drawing board. ....

At least we have 'progress' on this.
     
     
  #8592  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 9:12 PM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Rod View Post
^ your thoughts make total sense to me, particularly since they are stopping short on the MLine extension. Appears to me that the $ spent on the Light Rail now crowd could do the MLine correctly all the way (with UBC picking up some $$ too) while BRT is implemented in Surrey and everything else you said that good urban planners should be doing.

Rather - in order to get the MLine extended at all we have to be held hostage to politics SoF since the way this is set up we need their 'vote' of confidence to even consider such an otherwise necessary metro expansion.

I'd rather take Translink out of it completely and do a true Regional Transit district that is NOT made up of local mayors but instead appointed by the Providence. If we had that then MLine would already be subway out to UBC years ago, RAV line would have been a proper subway and not stopped at Richmond City Center but continued at least into Richmond city if not Steveston, and today we'd be talking about Expo Line extensions and North Shore metro rail options; instead were 30-40 years behind and have to placate the little suburbs to even get a necessary backbone to the region's transit on the drawing board. ....

At least we have 'progress' on this.
So something like a GOTransit for BC?
     
     
  #8593  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 9:15 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by retro_orange View Post
I really think they should have the first phase go just one more station West to Macdonald St. as it would catch that last bit of density along the Broadway corridor in that area of Kits. before UBC. There's a number of rental developments under construction in that area right now.

I believe Translink would like UBC to at least partially pay for the extension through the endowment lands which is why the phased approach as they have no intention to at this point.

As for Arbutus that's where the last of the commercial density ends along the Broadway corridor. Arbutus to Macdonald is a dead zone for both residential and commercial density but it picks back up once you get to Macdonald with new buildings going up to 5 floors I believe to Alma.
I dunno. Sure, there's more low/midrises coming up, but I really don't think it's going to justify the extra $200M to get to them. The Macdonald stop is pretty deserted as-is.
     
     
  #8594  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2018, 10:17 PM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
I dunno. Sure, there's more low/midrises coming up, but I really don't think it's going to justify the extra $200M to get to them. The Macdonald stop is pretty deserted as-is.

I use the Macdonald 99 stop twice a day during the week, it is crazy busy.
     
     
  #8595  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2018, 1:33 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpogue View Post
From Arbutus to UBC is double the distance, and close to 50% of the traffic along the 99B-line bus exits between Main Street and Arbutus.

More importantly, the scope of the project and pre-construction work and funding analysis has all been done as far as Arbutus. Changing the scope to go all the way to UBC at this point would result in further delays and another conversation about how to fund it.
if close to 50% of the users exit between main and arbutus, it follows that more than half these users will still have to transfer to a b-line or a local bus to continue their trip to points west (including UBC). a non-improvement to what is happening already

the planning for the last phase should be started soon, so when the money is available, its ready to go - not a few years later

Last edited by jsbertram; Mar 19, 2018 at 2:18 AM.
     
     
  #8596  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2018, 1:51 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram View Post
if close to 50% of the users exit between main and arbutus, it follows that more than half these users will still have to transfer to a b-line or a local bus to continue their trip to points west (including UBC). a non-improvement to what is happening already
I believe by “close” the actual numbers were just above 50% exit at Arbutus or before.

As for the remaining just under 50% service will still be far superior because the most congested / slowest portion of the 99 B-Line will be removed. The shorter distance and half the load will also greatly reduce wear and tear on the buses.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #8597  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2018, 2:49 AM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
While it would be nice if the Millenium line extension to go all the way to UBC. I can accept the fact that is is only going to Arbutus for now. It will be a big improvement over what we have now.
     
     
  #8598  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2018, 4:44 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
UBC deserves a subway infinitely more than York U, which now has TWO stations! And certainly more than wee lil Humber College, which will get a light rail station.
     
     
  #8599  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2018, 5:42 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
UBC deserves a subway infinitely more than York U, which now has TWO stations! And certainly more than wee lil Humber College, which will get a light rail station.
Yes all the broke students need to be whisked right to the front door of school paid for by the tax payers
     
     
  #8600  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2018, 2:51 PM
NewfBC NewfBC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
Yes all the broke students need to be whisked right to the front door of school paid for by the tax payers
What an ignorant comment. There are almost 15000 Faculty and Staff at UBC as well.

Ron.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:39 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.