HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2017, 1:13 PM
Dupcheck's Avatar
Dupcheck Dupcheck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: London
Posts: 255
Anything new on this? Or was it the usual Liberal election promise?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2017, 2:39 PM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,444
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2017, 4:46 AM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,755
The government has announced a "Planning Advisory Board".

https://www.ontario.ca/page/high-speed-rail

Couldn't be more of an election stunt. But better than nothing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2017, 6:55 PM
Dupcheck's Avatar
Dupcheck Dupcheck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: London
Posts: 255
__________________
Kick Bureaucracy in the Nardz
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2017, 11:55 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 8,910
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2017, 5:18 PM
Dupcheck's Avatar
Dupcheck Dupcheck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: London
Posts: 255
__________________
Kick Bureaucracy in the Nardz
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2017, 6:26 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Pass me the Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 50,857
the chevrons make it irreversible. if only.

Farms were cut in half by CPR, CNR, and other railways back in the day.
The 401 sliced many a farm in half or by some other fraction.
Eminent domain!
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2017, 8:48 PM
kaiserLDN kaiserLDN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: London
Posts: 384
I like Patrick's stance. All 3 political parties supporting it.

http://www.lfpress.com/2017/11/30/tory-l...-would-be-great-for-southwestern-ontario
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2017, 1:45 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,172
Surprised and relieved to hear this, as I have expressed in the past my main concern with this is the Libs spends $15 million to do environmental assessments to then be voted out and start all over.

Glad to hear at least PC are on board with the plan, now if all parties could just sit down together and come to an agreement it would make the process even easier. No question you are going to piss many people off but at the end of the day people will get over it and it is a huge need for Ontario.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2017, 4:28 PM
kaiserLDN kaiserLDN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: London
Posts: 384
Yeah I think a big key is to pleasing majority of NIMBYs some how and to work with them. Some NIMBYS wont work with anyone like the lady living at the Wharncliffe CN bridge. I guess those ones you don't worry about. In the high speed rail case it sounds like the farmers were talking about things from noise to how there tractors get to the other side of the field if the field is split in half which are legit arguments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2017, 10:23 PM
Djeffery's Avatar
Djeffery Djeffery is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 6,204
One thing being talked about on the talk shows was the lack of level crossings. They make it sound like every road being crossed by HSR will be blocked off. I'm curious how many roads will be dead ended due to the new railway and what the reasons are they can't have crossings on them?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2017, 2:34 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 8,910
http://www.lfpress.com/2017/12/22/high-speed-trains-will-derail-regions-needs

Reality and politics like oil and water. Rarely do they mix.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2017, 4:45 PM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by jammer139 View Post
http://www.lfpress.com/2017/12/22/high-speed-trains-will-derail-regions-needs

Reality and politics like oil and water. Rarely do they mix.
The writer of that article clearly has a dog in the fight. He's trying to promote HPR, that his association made a report on, that would give St. Mary's 10 VIA trains a day.

Hopefully the leaders in Queens Park ignore this rabble. We needed HSR decades ago. Sure some properties will be expropriated, and roads closed but it'll payoff in the long run. That same type of narrow minded thinking is why big ideas never come to fruition!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 5:41 PM
Dupcheck's Avatar
Dupcheck Dupcheck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: London
Posts: 255
__________________
Kick Bureaucracy in the Nardz
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 2:56 AM
tyeman200's Avatar
tyeman200 tyeman200 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
One thing being talked about on the talk shows was the lack of level crossings. They make it sound like every road being crossed by HSR will be blocked off. I'm curious how many roads will be dead ended due to the new railway and what the reasons are they can't have crossings on them?
I agree completely about the crossings. Doesn't seem too hard to put them there, not to mention this train is probably going 200km/h so it would take a minute or so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 11:22 AM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 8,910
Folks need to relax. The only thing that has happened is the company doing the $15M EA has started this week.

A EA is not a project. It's no coincidence that this EA is starting now just 12 weeks away from a provincial election. The Liberals will try to portray the EA as the start of actual construction. Not even close.

On the topic of dead ending roads. All those dirt roads in rural areas every 1000 yards or mile will be dead-ended or there will be a over/under pass built. In no case can there be a level crossing with the high speed track bed.

In a SHIFT related thread someone posted that we needed to build the BRT in order to get HSR. Trying to link the two is wrong and tries to imply they are dependant on each other. Totally false! Assuming a HSR is built and goes west from Toronto towards southern ontario it will goto London regardless of whether we have a BRT or not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 11:34 AM
Djeffery's Avatar
Djeffery Djeffery is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 6,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by jammer139 View Post

On the topic of dead ending roads. All those dirt roads in rural areas every 1000 yards or mile will be dead-ended or there will be a over/under pass built. In no case can there be a level crossing with the high speed track bed.
Why is that? It's not like we are talking about something running at Toronto Subway frequency. They haven't said yet how many trains a day, but I can't imagine it being any more than one an hour during the day. No reason that there can't be level crossings at many of those lesser roads that aren't busy enough to justify an overpass, but also geographically are important enough to not completely block off either. Also, where does the train stop at London then? Surely they aren't going to build an overpass at every road on the way downtown, and nobody is going to accept saying that any of the roads with level crossings now are going to be blocked off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 12:06 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 8,910
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-10/pa...rain-clips-car-at-level-crossing/8792328

Video isn't even a real HSR train. ie: 200Kmh plus

Real HSR track beds that support 200, 250, 300+ Kmh trains cannot risk level crossings from safety perspective. You can't afford a accident at this speed.

It's way different then a freight train rail bed that maxes out at 120Kmh.

How many level crossings are so torn up by vehicles (ie: trucks) that you wouldn't be able to run the train at its rated speed.

Spending $30B to run trains at 150Kmh is a show stopper. Just like spending $500M plus on BRT that only saves 1-3 mins on a bus trip in London.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 12:20 PM
GreatTallNorth2 GreatTallNorth2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
Why is that? It's not like we are talking about something running at Toronto Subway frequency. They haven't said yet how many trains a day, but I can't imagine it being any more than one an hour during the day
It will definitely be more than one train an hour.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 2:45 PM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
Why is that? It's not like we are talking about something running at Toronto Subway frequency. They haven't said yet how many trains a day, but I can't imagine it being any more than one an hour during the day. No reason that there can't be level crossings at many of those lesser roads that aren't busy enough to justify an overpass, but also geographically are important enough to not completely block off either. Also, where does the train stop at London then? Surely they aren't going to build an overpass at every road on the way downtown, and nobody is going to accept saying that any of the roads with level crossings now are going to be blocked off.
I suspect this will be handled very similarly to the 401 - some minor township roads will get cut off, provincial highways and county roads will get an overpass, and some minor township roads will get one too. As an example, if we assume the HSR will run along the hydro corridor between London and K-W, it will cross Oxford County Road 6 just north of Embro, and there would likely be an overpass there. To the east it would also cross County Road 59, which would likely also get an overpass, but of the six north-south township roads in between the two major roads, I'd say at least one of them would also get an overpass. Indeed, down at the 401, there's an overpass for Dodge Line, in between County Road 6 and Sweaburg Road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:03 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.