Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343
|
I didn't get a chance to give a final review of this building in the thread before it shut down.
I'm always wary when a developer decides to go the traditional route, because almost always, the execution and building materials fall flat. This is one of the very rare exceptions and certainly the most prominent. (The only other example I can think of is the Dillworth House). I still much prefer buildings built in the contemporary style of the day - what would our city look like if architects of the 1920's and 1930's eschewed what was in fashion then in favor of colonial-era copy cats? Pushing the envelope and adding new, fresh styles only adds to our city's rich architectural heritage. Nevertheless, if developers insist on going the traditional route, at least take a page from the Alexander and do it right. The only other critique is that I would have preferred to have retail all the way around Vine Street where there are currently townhomes - I can't imagine having my front door right on Vine Street like that, but on the whole, that's a very, very minor thing. From getting the details right to using quality materials to the way it meets the street (despite the fact it's not on a very pedestrian friendly intersection), this building does everything right.
Overall, I'd give this a 4 out of 5. Although the style isn't new or exciting, this is a solid, well designed building that sets the standard for what a faux traditional building should look like. (For reference, other 4's in my book = FMC, Comcast Center, and St. James).