Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000
^ Based on the "megaregions" map that the discussion was flowing from
|
I never understood why, other than relative geographic proximity, Pittsburgh was put into the Great Lakes megaregion on that map. I mean, if you look at migration, Pittsburgh has a lot of churn with DC, Philly, and New York, but basically none with the Midwest past Ohio. Virtually no one from Chicago moves here, or vice versa.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000
But Pittsburgh certainly shares connection with the Great Lakes cities of Buffalo, Cleveland, and Erie, although it decidedly much more Appalachian than Great Lakes.
|
It really doesn't share a lot with these cities, other than a shared industrial heritage.
Buffalo and Cleveland are "northern" cities, which were settled originally by old-stock Yankees traveling westward via the Erie canal. The have a lot of shared characteristics from this, including Inland North dialects (also shared with Chicago, Detroit, etc) and a built vernacular based on detached wood-framed structures spaced relatively far apart.
In contrast, Pittsburgh is a "midland" city. It was settled initially mostly by Scotch-Irish migrants traveling westward from eastern Pennsylvania and Virginia. Similar to the dialects of the Mid-Atlantic and the lower Midwest, the local dialect isn't fully "northern" but has some southern elements as well. The built vernacular was much tighter, brick-heavy, and featured a lot of rowhouses - building styles which continued westward (in modified form) to Cincinnati and St. Louis.
Erie was originally a "northern" city, but over time has become more "Midland" when it comes to accent due to the influence of the Pittsburgh media market. The same basic pattern also happened in St. Louis, but in reverse as the city became influenced by Chicago during the 20th century.