HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #561  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2018, 9:34 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,514
Those last 2 renderings from the DailyHive don't look all that promising - looks pretty utilitarian in a 1970s sense.

Last edited by officedweller; Jan 31, 2018 at 10:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #562  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2018, 10:20 AM
Joat's Avatar
Joat Joat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 226
So they're not gonna do the big pond ? Booooo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #563  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2018, 4:57 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Renderings from the DailyHive.

The very definition of green-washing in that rendering, which Gillespie is well-renowned for.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #564  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2018, 4:58 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
i like it; surprised they are keeping the red brick part in the front, though. seems like a no-brainier to tear those things down.
bcIMC/Quadreal doesn't own the brick building, IIRC. It's a separate strata.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #565  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2018, 4:59 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
I don't disagree that this is something you would see in Singapore.

Looks pretty nice - overall much better than what's currently onsite.

I do think some of the criticisms are valid, but at some point you just need to get to building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #566  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2018, 5:05 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Might be because it is an amendment to a previous approval which was approved under different guidelines.

I have no inside knowledge but that would be my guess since this was already approved before.
No demand, eh? I guess Gillespie and Quadreal are suicidal in proposing this behemoth.

With all the previous restrictions removed, see what Vancouver is capable of.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #567  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2018, 8:34 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
No demand, eh? I guess Gillespie and Quadreal are suicidal in proposing this behemoth.

With all the previous restrictions removed, see what Vancouver is capable of.
But they cancelled double-decking the mall and will just keep a single storey mall
(supposedly due to the inability to build underground parking due to the acquifer).
...if they really wanted to they could have found other solutions to provide parking (above grade?) and increase the amount of mall retail space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #568  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2018, 8:59 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
But they cancelled double-decking the mall and will just keep a single storey mall
(supposedly due to the inability to build underground parking due to the acquifer).
...if they really wanted to they could have found other solutions to provide parking (above grade?) and increase the amount of mall retail space.
I'm not so sure now if they would keep the indoor portion of the mall single-storey. They did say that they won't be just adding structures on top the existing mall, but that the entire existing structure would be replaced with a new one. The aquifer affects the underground parkade, that I agree, but with a second floor retail, I don't see why the aquifer would affect that, as pilings for the foundation can be done away from the aquifer. Maybe I'm wrong, but I still hope they can add height to the existing indoor mall, at least partially. As far as the renderings go, we can tell that at least for the outdoor portion of the mall, there would be upper floors, and that is also really sweet.

http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/oakridge-centre-redevelopment-vancouver-2018-design
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #569  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2018, 9:17 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,992
does the hudsons bay still move to a location fronting 41st?
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #570  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2018, 9:18 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,514
Supposedly, the acquifer prevented them form meeting the [underground] parking requirements of the bigger 2 storey enclosed mall.
From the renderings, the 2 storey spaces shown could be podium retail or even office space, so I'm not sure how the 2 storey
(and taller) spaces shown in the renderings fit into the overall project, but I don't think it'll be a full-on 2 storey mall corridor.

i.e. this space below appears to be formed by the edges of podiums:


http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/oakridge-centre-redevelopment-vancouver-2018-design


http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/oakridge-centre-redevelopment-vancouver-2018-design

The 2nd storey (podium) spaces on the left appear to be offices:


http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/oakridge-centre-redevelopment-vancouver-2018-design


http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/oakridge-centre-redevelopment-vancouver-2018-design

*********
WRT Hudson's Bay - unless QuadReal has come to terms with HBC, Ivanhoe Cambridge had (before the sale to QuadReal)
said that Hudson's Bay store would be staying in its existing location due to its current lease terms.

Last edited by officedweller; Jan 31, 2018 at 9:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #571  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2018, 9:09 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
*********
WRT Hudson's Bay - unless QuadReal has come to terms with HBC, Ivanhoe Cambridge had (before the sale to QuadReal)
said that Hudson's Bay store would be staying in its existing location due to its current lease terms.
The Daily Hive article quotes a QualReal rep as saying every square inch of retail at Oakridge will be newly built.
I'm thinking that a lot of the retail will be outdoor lifestyle space.

Quote:
The floor area of retail at the new multi-storey shopping centre will almost double from the existing 574,000 sq. ft. to about one million sq. ft., with an east-west galleria spine running from the SkyTrain station to the development’s western edge.

There will also be a new indoor mall area on the existing site and a pedestrian-only, outdoor high-street lined with retail running north-south along the length of the mall’s perimeter to the west.
http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/oakridge-centre-redevelopment-vancouver-2018-design

It'll be interesting to see floorplans when available.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #572  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2018, 9:00 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Those last 2 renderings from the DailyHive don't look all that promising - looks pretty utilitarian in a 1970s sense.
The second last reminds me of Barbican.
__________________
In the heart of a busy metropolis skyscrapers are a vivid reminder of the constant yearning of the human spirit to rise to God
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #573  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2018, 9:43 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Supposedly, the acquifer prevented them form meeting the [underground] parking requirements of the bigger 2 storey enclosed mall.
From the renderings, the 2 storey spaces shown could be podium retail or even office space, so I'm not sure how the 2 storey
(and taller) spaces shown in the renderings fit into the overall project, but I don't think it'll be a full-on 2 storey mall corridor.

WRT Hudson's Bay - unless QuadReal has come to terms with HBC, Ivanhoe Cambridge had (before the sale to QuadReal)
said that Hudson's Bay store would be staying in its existing location due to its current lease terms.
You could be right about the indoor mall section. Would still love a multi-level interior done, at least for part of the mall, like an entrance foyer with a fountain, and grand stairways/escalators leading to the park above. That's important as the first impression counts for visitors coming in from the Canada Line station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #574  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2018, 9:56 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,514
I only see one main "mall" indicated by a large glass canopy.
I see maybe 2 secondary corridors that could be mall with skylights.
I've circled in orange below.
The main corridor should funnel people to the open "mews" at the back of the site, otherwise the retail back there could stagnate.

In comparison, Brentwood and Lougheed have their open air lifestyle retail areas up front - fronting the rap[id transit station.
Here, the open air retail is hidden in the back - largely because the Cambie & 41st plaza is bound by the existing office and condo buildings.



I think the rendering below shows the area circled in red, above.
So the main corridor could be multi-level, but the lower level looks dark and 1970s-ish.


http://www.vancourier.com/real-estate/oa...-looks-to-evoke-hometown-feel-1.23160550

The Vancouver Courier has an article about the interior designer for Oakridge's mall:

Oakridge project's Tokyo-based interior designer looks to evoke hometown feel
http://www.vancourier.com/real-estate/oa...-looks-to-evoke-hometown-feel-1.23160550

Wonderwall projects look promising (but I think there may be some visual overload):

Emporium Melbourne
http://wonder-wall.com/project/299/

Westfield Sydney
http://wonder-wall.com/project/223/

IAPM, Shanghai
http://wonder-wall.com/project/293/

Last edited by officedweller; Feb 1, 2018 at 10:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #575  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2018, 5:49 AM
Max. Max. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: West Van
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I only see one main "mall" indicated by a large glass canopy.
I see maybe 2 secondary corridors that could be mall with skylights.
I've circled in orange below.
The main corridor should funnel people to the open "mews" at the back of the site, otherwise the retail back there could stagnate.

In comparison, Brentwood and Lougheed have their open air lifestyle retail areas up front - fronting the rap[id transit station.
Here, the open air retail is hidden in the back - largely because the Cambie & 41st plaza is bound by the existing office and condo buildings.



I think the rendering below shows the area circled in red, above.
So the main corridor could be multi-level, but the lower level looks dark and 1970s-ish.


http://www.vancourier.com/real-estate/oa...-looks-to-evoke-hometown-feel-1.23160550

The Vancouver Courier has an article about the interior designer for Oakridge's mall:

Oakridge project's Tokyo-based interior designer looks to evoke hometown feel
http://www.vancourier.com/real-estate/oa...-looks-to-evoke-hometown-feel-1.23160550

Wonderwall projects look promising (but I think there may be some visual overload):

Emporium Melbourne
http://wonder-wall.com/project/299/

Westfield Sydney
http://wonder-wall.com/project/223/

IAPM, Shanghai
http://wonder-wall.com/project/293/
Wow! iAPM is my favourite mall in Shanghai, great interior design and open from 10am to 11pm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #576  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2018, 7:55 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
Our indoor mall attracts the most people during lousy weather, so it would make sense to have the indoor portion right next to the skytrain station. Depending on the weather, shoppers can venture out to the open if they so desire. Plus it would be nice to have the more "hidden" alcoves, plazas and more shops to explore outside when you are done with the indoor portion.

For Brentwood, it's actually not so nice that people have to "get wet/cold" before they walk into the mall proper. Of course, proper walkway shelters would help, but I rather be all-comfy when I go shopping.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #577  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2018, 8:04 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
Hmmm the Emporium Melbourne mall in Melbourne's CBD reminds me of the soon-to-be-revamped downtown Montreal's Eaton Centre as well as the Mid Valley Garden's mall in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia..
Emporium Melbourne:
http://wonder-wall.com/project/299/
Makes our Pacific Centre look pretty pathetic.


Eaton Centre, Montreal:
https://www.retail-insider.com/retail-insider/2018/1/ivanhoe-cambridge-montreal-eaton-centre

Mid Valley Gardens, KL:
https://www.tripadvisor.com/LocationPhot...ll-Kuala_Lumpur_Wilayah_Persekutuan.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #578  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2018, 11:32 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,514
Interestingly, Pacific Centre has a funkier look when it opened in the 1970s.
I remember orange and browns and lots of slats / lines on the ceiling in angular "tron" patterns.


https://designkultur.wordpress.com/2012/...-pellis-eatons-pacific-centre-1973-2012/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #579  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2018, 4:05 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,992
ugh the 70's
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #580  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2018, 4:13 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
ugh the 70's
You're about to live through them again, the inflation and all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.