Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
I am actually fond of saying on here that (Anglo-)Canada *does* differ from the U.S. in terms of ethos, mindset, feel, etc. (you get the idea), but part of me does have to admit there is a kind of biblical "blessed are those who believe without seeing" aspect to it.
A lot of the "Canadian difference" as usually defined is based on what are actually fundamental human traits like niceness, politeness, humility, compassion that aren't necessarily the exclusive domain of any particular nationality. Sure, they may be more or less present in certain human groupings, but ascribing them to diverse demographics of millions of people is always extremely tricky.
|
I think that English Canada differs from the US in some very profound and measurable ways. In terms of everyday impact, a laundry list would include: religiosity and church attendance, willingness to use public transit, general trust in government, attitude toward gun control, violent crime rates, etc.
I'll also throw in a couple of traits that I think the US does better, although a lot of it is not as easy to keep statistics on: Americans are more driven, intelligent Americans are more inquisitive and less likely to accept things at face value; Americans have a stronger sense of tribal pride (60% of the time this is a good thing); Americans are more philanthropic.
When you think about this, this is remarkable.
English Canada is physically and linguistically tethered to the most powerful culture on the globe and also tethered no one else (except Quebec); we are tied at the hip to a culture so big and powerful that people halfway across the world who don't speak English fear losing some of their indigenous culture to creeping Americanism.
Why don't we have the same gun ownership rates? Unlike them, a large part of our raison d'etre was to hunt for furs in the vast wilderness. Why do we have double, often triple, the public transit ridership rates that they have? Our cities are just as hopelessly built around the car as theirs are. Why do we have the church attendance of a Western European country? We should have been a magnet for immigrants of religious persecution as much as they were during the 19th century. The list goes on. These traits are so pervasive that they are common across all of Canada, irrespective of region, city size and social class. When it comes to church attendance or gun ownership rates or public transit ridership, southwestern Ontario has more in common with Quebec or Belgium than it does with Michigan.
Now I suppose the rebuttal would be that the US is the exception and not Canada, and that we are in line with Western Europe when it comes to a lot of these social metrics. And my response would be that it doesn't matter, because Western Europe is 6,000 km away, not 60, and that most of the fundamental differences that Canada has are postwar developments when Western Europe - even Britain - was out of the picture for many of us.