HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6661  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 2:17 AM
schaalman schaalman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 14
A subway isn't even remotely feasible anywhere in ATL. Not nearly enough density. Extending Marta some and perhaps light rail to certain nodes, probably/hopefully?

Transit-wise, not that it's politically feasible, but we need to bring principal routes in our "claimed" world-class city to a simple standard of having AT LEAST 2 lanes of through traffic in each direction without being impeded by left-turners. Anything less than this is woefully inadequate even for a city of 50,000. Howell Mill, Monroe, Moreland? That's just one H and 2 M's. If you go through the alphabet, the list is much longer.

Last edited by schaalman; Jan 18, 2018 at 2:22 AM. Reason: Wanted to reply to a comment not start a new comment
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6662  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 2:51 AM
cabasse's Avatar
cabasse cabasse is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ἀταλάντη
Posts: 4,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by schaalman View Post
A subway isn't even remotely feasible anywhere in ATL. Not nearly enough density. Extending Marta some and perhaps light rail to certain nodes, probably/hopefully?

Transit-wise, not that it's politically feasible, but we need to bring principal routes in our "claimed" world-class city to a simple standard of having AT LEAST 2 lanes of through traffic in each direction without being impeded by left-turners. Anything less than this is woefully inadequate even for a city of 50,000. Howell Mill, Monroe, Moreland? That's just one H and 2 M's. If you go through the alphabet, the list is much longer.
but...but...marta is a subway?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6663  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 7:05 AM
pica pica is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabasse View Post
but...but...marta is a subway?
Oh my gosh, thank you; that comment made me feel like I was taking crazy pills. Don't I ride in a subway every time I take MARTA through downtown and midtown?

Even so... MARTA is doing exactly what they said; extending existing HRT, building infill stations, and creating a light rail system. I don't even get what the criticism is.

That we need to demolish some buildings on Moreland so it can have 4 lanes with a turn lane all the way through? I think the Little 5 Points folks would probably want to know which small businesses you plan on taking the wrecking ball to.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6664  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 7:06 AM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6665  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 7:44 AM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6666  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 12:53 PM
bigstick's Avatar
bigstick bigstick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: 30327
Posts: 1,981
Amazing pic...Thanks
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6667  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 3:33 PM
schaalman schaalman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 14
For like what? 2 or 3 miles? Perhaps when we talk of "subway" we mean more generally heavy rail with its own right of way. Additions to MARTA will for the most part be elevated. Not enough density to do what LA has done in the last 20 years.

Even Chicago's subway is pretty limited. Most of it is elevated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6668  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 3:50 PM
MdtwnATL MdtwnATL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by schaalman View Post
A subway isn't even remotely feasible anywhere in ATL. Not nearly enough density. Extending Marta some and perhaps light rail to certain nodes, probably/hopefully?

Transit-wise, not that it's politically feasible, but we need to bring principal routes in our "claimed" world-class city to a simple standard of having AT LEAST 2 lanes of through traffic in each direction without being impeded by left-turners. Anything less than this is woefully inadequate even for a city of 50,000. Howell Mill, Monroe, Moreland? That's just one H and 2 M's. If you go through the alphabet, the list is much longer.
A subway is remotely feasible because a subway already exists. And it's BECAUSE of the spotty density that a subway makes the most sense. The lack of a clear grid on the surface means digging under ground can get folks from neighborhood to neighborhood the quickest without impeding traffic above.

Furthermore, many of the streets you see in West Midtown are what they are, and they will not be changing. You won't see this wide 5 lane streets anywhere ever over there, or throughout much of ATL.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6669  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 3:56 PM
Atlantis's Avatar
Atlantis Atlantis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Decatur, Georgia
Posts: 244
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6670  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 3:56 PM
MdtwnATL MdtwnATL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by schaalman View Post
For like what? 2 or 3 miles? Perhaps when we talk of "subway" we mean more generally heavy rail with its own right of way. Additions to MARTA will for the most part be elevated. Not enough density to do what LA has done in the last 20 years.

Even Chicago's subway is pretty limited. Most of it is elevated.
Chicago has a perfect grid and the elevated portion of it (there's plenty underground as well) is perfectly woven into it. That's simply not happening in Atlanta.

Explain to me how density impacts the feasibility of a subway. Also explain to me how a heavy rail train will get it's own right of way on, say, Howell Mill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6671  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 5:12 PM
WFTGATL WFTGATL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 41


https://www.flickr.com/photos/20034178@N04/shares/3XHj3j







Sunday dog walk, TheStandard, Coda, Lilly and view of north Midtown from my condo. - can't figure out how to post the photos directly?????

Last edited by WFTGATL; Jan 18, 2018 at 6:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6672  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 5:22 PM
testarossa50 testarossa50 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 837
lol @ nonsensical semantics of "subway", and arguments that all major streets must be four lanes. Are you like a time traveler from the 1960s or something?

Back to updates on Atlanta highrise urban development, please.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6673  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 5:24 PM
Libertarian's Avatar
Libertarian Libertarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,430
Prague is one example of a relatively small city with an extensive underground system. With improved technology of granite tunneling I could see it happening here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotthard_Base_Tunnel
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6674  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 5:26 PM
Dettmann1 Dettmann1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by MdtwnATL View Post
Chicago has a perfect grid and the elevated portion of it (there's plenty underground as well) is perfectly woven into it. That's simply not happening in Atlanta.

Explain to me how density impacts the feasibility of a subway. Also explain to me how a heavy rail train will get it's own right of way on, say, Howell Mill.
It won't. However, it could use the Beltline, North Ave and potentially some of the railway corridors that surround West Midtown (Tracks elevated above the Train ROW similar to portions of the existing MARTA lines). I strongly doubt any new heavy rail is built within the perimeter of Atlanta for the forseable future. Most cities have gone to light rail as its less expensive to build.

Tunneling adds immensely to both the time and cost of a transit system. Its like 5 to 6x minimum the cost of an at grade transit line. Given that Atlanta has limited access to funds currently, I'm not sure that's a way to stretch transit dollars as far as they probably need to go.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6675  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 5:57 PM
Libertarian's Avatar
Libertarian Libertarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,430
Well yes, ATL has limited funds for infrastructure - just look at the surface streets. The only cash source would be the feds but as a libertarian I hope not. They want to fund infrastructure with gas taxes which (no matter how much you like the US Chamber of Commerce) is not the answer unless you want the middle class consumer to once more take the hit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6676  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 6:10 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by Libertarian View Post
Well yes, ATL has limited funds for infrastructure - just look at the surface streets. The only cash source would be the feds but as a libertarian I hope not. They want to fund infrastructure with gas taxes which (no matter how much you like the US Chamber of Commerce) is not the answer unless you want the middle class consumer to once more take the hit.
Most importantly Atlanta has the ability to borrow and with the highest credit rating - we can do it relatively cheaper than most cities. Also, with a the 3rd fastest growing population (gross annual increase, not annual % increase) we have a firm foundation to fund infrastructure spending.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6677  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 6:47 PM
Libertarian's Avatar
Libertarian Libertarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,430
Atlanta is ranked 118 out of 150 US cities for financial stability (1 being best and 150 worst).
https://wallethub.com/edu/best-run-cities/22869/#detailed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6678  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 7:00 PM
BlueSangha's Avatar
BlueSangha BlueSangha is offline
Topher’s 2 cents
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 944
__________________
Enjoy the journey...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6679  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 7:07 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by Libertarian View Post
Atlanta is ranked 118 out of 150 US cities for financial stability (1 being best and 150 worst).
https://wallethub.com/edu/best-run-cities/22869/#detailed
Not sure about Wallethub, but when a city issues bonds Standard & Poor's is the only credit rating that matters and we are looking really good.

https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/blog.../atlanta-wins-credit-ratingupgrades.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6680  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 7:08 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by WFTGATL View Post


https://www.flickr.com/photos/20034178@N04/shares/3XHj3j







Sunday dog walk, TheStandard, Coda, Lilly and view of north Midtown from my condo. - can't figure out how to post the photos directly?????
Thanks for posting. Lilli looks so friggin good.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:56 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.