HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Based on options for Broadway Corridor Study, what is your preferred choice?
BRT: Commercial to UBC 25 6.16%
LRT A: Commercial to UBC OR Commercial via VCC to UBC 31 7.64%
LRT B: Main St. to UBC AND Commercial to UBC 18 4.43%
RRT: Commercial to UBC OR VCC to UBC 283 69.70%
COMBO: RRT to Arbutus/LRT to Main St via Arbutus 39 9.61%
BUS: Enhanced Bus Service for all buses to UBC 10 2.46%
Voters: 406. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8501  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2018, 4:50 PM
afreak afreak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kisai View Post
There are only two good reasons, and several bad ones to replace hardware:

1) it is impossible to source new old stock(NOS) parts. As an example, there are still millions of floppy drives out there, but nobody produces blank disks anymore. However, floppy-drive emulators do exist, and they can be produced cheaper than sourcing an OEM NOS floppy drive. Then you just stick an SD card or USB stick in that and you're golden.

2) Voltage and frequency differences in integration. Good luck installing old SCADA ISA expansions boards from a 386 or 486 into a Xeon E5.

Bad reasons

1) newer stuff is easier to manage. This is never, ever, true. Often people like accountants or marketing people like some fancy new system, that the underlying tech is actually no different.

2) newer thing costs less to run(eg less people or energy costs) as this often ignores the costs of switching and running two systems in parallel while the news stuff is trained.

3) someone sees obsolete things like floppy drives, tape drives, CD-roms, CRT screens, etc somewhere and wants to replace it because it's embarrassing to show the media and tourists.
You're more or less right on the money. The thing is, you can go and replace components of an industrial control system piecemeal but the way the whole system is designed cannot just go and be replaced.

You could go and do something like replace the floppy drive with something that emulates one, but it may also be problematic if you have a support contract with a firm that may not support that. The hardware may not be under warranty (and undoubtedly this is the case here) but there are cases where you can get a contract with someone to handle obsolete software and hardware.

I'd be reluctant to use a floppy drive emulator in any ICS setup even considering that I own one.

The underlying protocols and standards that SkyTrain and other ICS implementations has not changed all that much if at all in the past few decades. The physical implementation has definitely changed with the onset of 802.11 and other protocols (heck even ZigBee is showing up often in ICS but that too is about 20-years old), but networking is a multi-layered approach and hasn't fundamentally changed since the early 1980s.

Now, the suggestion that one can just go and buy up floppy diskettes on Amazon is a tad problematic since floppy disks made in the 1980s and through to the mid to late 1990s tend to be really reliable, but anytime after that is a huge 🞵🞵🞵🞵-shoot in terms of quality.

At the end of the day, SkyTrain's design is meant to last more than three decades and I am more than willing to bet that while the computers will be replaced in the near future, the overall design and signalling system will more or less remain the same long past my departure from this planet. I know that for some of you you're looking at it as everything is antiquated, but bear in mind that we're lucky to have a system that allows for signal reversals from the ground-up whereas other systems are going through growing pains to implement such (*cough*TTC*cough*).

Heck, go to New York City and you'll realise that the traffic lights while maybe having LEDs within are still running on mechanical clocks driven by the city's electricity. It was really weird to see one in action in the middle of Manhattan but they're there and they still work.

Last edited by afreak; Jan 10, 2018 at 5:22 PM.
     
     
  #8502  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2018, 8:10 PM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by cornholio View Post
Great points and right on the mark. I have plenty of personal experience with this. The thing is paying and training people and usually sourcing custom parts (unless really impossible) is far cheaper even if expensive then a major system failure due to untested hardware/software or a risky complex system redesign. Stability in complex and critical systems comes first. People that want to replace functioning systems or hardware with something newer because piss me off in my work. Newer is not better. In fact it is generally worse as it opens up new and unnecessary risks.



Your nuclear experience is interesting. A close uncle of mine was a engineer at one of the Nuclear power plants here in Central Europe (Temelin) and I have visited it before. Actually even last summer I did another tour which included a tour of the duplicate operating room etc used for training (i.e. they have a perfect copy of everything where they train operators for years until they can enter the real operating room). They use old tech for the critical systems from the 70's early 80's and it keeps getting replaced by the same stuff. Only some of the desk monitors etc are new but the critical systems are still the same. Why? Because its tested and it works. Upgrading anything poses unacceptable risks in the nuclear power plant in the middle of Europe. p.s. as you seem to have a interest in nuclear if you ever go out there you can do a tour of Temelin. The virtual tour is quite good and covers the interior so if it einterests you check it out from the link. You can use chrome or what ever to translate to english...
Off topics, but yes interesting reactor. I have never been in one that evolved out of a Russian design.

The CANDU reactors all have training simulators, when I worked in the industry, CAE was the main supplier of the simulator. They also do aircraft simulators.

The requirements for an industrial application are also different than the gear you buy at BestBuy.

A display monitor as an example. In the nuclear industry you have to put it on a shake table and environmentally quality that it will work during and after an earthquake. As well as being designed to be on 24/7 for years before it hits it MTBF. Speaking of disk drives, 15 years ago, many of the nuclear reactor control computers had paper tape emulators. It permitted the use of a flopping instead of well paper tape for booting the control software.

You pay more for the more demanding requirements. Shows up in other areas. The digital signage in your local coffee shop, is most likely an industrial digital signage set that is designed to be on 24/7 and it can easily cost four figures instead of the consumer version that is three figures.
     
     
  #8503  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2018, 8:20 PM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by afreak View Post
Now, the suggestion that one can just go and buy up floppy diskettes on Amazon is a tad problematic since floppy disks made in the 1980s and through to the mid to late 1990s tend to be really reliable, but anytime after that is a huge 🞵🞵🞵🞵-shoot in terms of quality.
There are a few vendors in the United States (Athana International comes to mind) who you can still bulk order NEW floppy disks in almost any size, capacity, density and sectoring, however due to cost there are minimum order requirements ranging between 200, 500 and 1000 disks per order so you won't find them selling on Amazon. I know many of the larger foundations and museums that operate or archive older computers use them.
     
     
  #8504  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2018, 5:18 AM
Reecemartin's Avatar
Reecemartin Reecemartin is offline
YouTube Creator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 1,776
[Deleted]

Last edited by Reecemartin; Nov 18, 2020 at 1:19 AM.
     
     
  #8505  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2018, 4:44 PM
afreak afreak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reecemartin View Post
Ok so since I set a lot of that off I feel I may as well comment:

a) I also have a degree in CS but, I am not sure it qualifies anyone to talk about standards thats much more and ECE domain

b) Indeed the components used in industrial settings and in critical infrastructure are totally different than consumer products, they often cost multiples more, are built to much tighter tolerances and lower failure rates and often also have built in redundancy

c) My point about media has nothing to do with the DRM associated with the media, I'm simply saying there are newer and still highly reliable mediums accessible

d) All this if it ain't broke don't fix it talk is well and good until what ends up happening is you live on the status quo so long that you are left with a legacy system like NYC or Toronto and then have to shut the system down extensively sometimes for years at a time rather than upgrading your standards and infra all along

e) All the "fear" around wireless is basically anecdotal, a massive number of system use wireless systems with no/minor issues while of course a few have expirienced more pronounced problems

Perhaps a good solution would be to do a P3 eventually with a DBFOM model for signalling and skytrain operations and simply let the market handle this, as we all know upgrades can be expensive but virtually always lead to a lower cost of operation (which is much more important with the infrastructure we are talking about which will last for decades and decades to come)

Now lets get things back on topic, do we know what the Platform Orientation will be? Spanish Solution at City Hall?
A computer science degree doesn't automatically give you the insight and expertise into the matter but sure let's move the topic on as I've already made my points.
     
     
  #8506  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2018, 7:44 PM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reecemartin View Post
e) All the "fear" around wireless is basically anecdotal, a massive number of system use wireless systems with no/minor issues while of course a few have expirienced more pronounced problems
The fear revolves around the notion of "why take a risk?", which is the question I have.
     
     
  #8507  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2018, 8:59 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
I think this topic has run it's course now, and we should get back to the Broadway Extension itself
     
     
  #8508  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2018, 11:53 PM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
I think this topic has run it's course now, and we should get back to the Broadway Extension itself
i saw some land surveying going on around Vine/Arbutus/Maple. i also noticed some people from the city doing traffic counts of all modes on those intersections for the Rapid Transit Office. (guy in the orange vest type thing )
     
     
  #8509  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 12:28 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
So with what is likely to be a very different council in Vancouver before this ever breaks ground, do we think it will lead other options being considered? Since no council can tie the hands of future councils, the current rule of not allowing cut and cover could be tossed, heck they can even go above ground if the appetite is there. Perhaps take it along 10th afterall, bike lanes be damned. Thoughts?
     
     
  #8510  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 12:47 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
So with what is likely to be a very different council in Vancouver before this ever breaks ground, do we think it will lead other options being considered? Since no council can tie the hands of future councils, the current rule of not allowing cut and cover could be tossed, heck they can even go above ground if the appetite is there. Perhaps take it along 10th afterall, bike lanes be damned. Thoughts?
i don't see it being above ground due to how tight the streets of 8th, Broadway, and 10th are. there isn't a lot of space for the guideway. on Broadway there would be, but then you'd end up with a 4 lane arterial vs a 6 lane. i don't see a future council doing that.

on 10th and 8th, i don't see them cutting all those trees down and having the guideway being ft from people bedrooms/living-rooms.

but, as for cut-and-cover on Broadway; depending on ground conditions i could see them doing that if it saves a lot of money. but, on the other hand it was such a political issue with Cambie and ended up in the courts i could see a future council being afraid to do that as well due to political backlash. plus then the traffic issues.

cut-and-cover on 10th? that could happen assuming the ground conditions/utilities allow for it. if the only reason for it not being cut-and-cover on 10th is the bike-way, then i could see them doing that happening. such as if the NPA gets elected.
     
     
  #8511  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 2:26 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
So with what is likely to be a very different council in Vancouver before this ever breaks ground, do we think it will lead other options being considered? Since no council can tie the hands of future councils, the current rule of not allowing cut and cover could be tossed, heck they can even go above ground if the appetite is there. Perhaps take it along 10th afterall, bike lanes be damned. Thoughts?
I hope your incorrect. Once the project moves forward it will have a momentum all its own, especially given it is a provincial government/translink project. A new council coming in not going to want to revisit decisions that have been made and contracts that have been signed.

The site-C is a good example of this. The project was at the point of no return when a new government came in to place. After much talking, study evaluation they came to consultation there was choice but to move forward.
     
     
  #8512  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 3:29 AM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
cut-and-cover on 10th? that could happen assuming the ground conditions/utilities allow for it. if the only reason for it not being cut-and-cover on 10th is the bike-way, then i could see them doing that happening. such as if the NPA gets elected.
The NPA is the party of west side NIMBYs. No way there is cut and cover for any portion of the M-Line extension.
     
     
  #8513  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 4:09 AM
Reecemartin's Avatar
Reecemartin Reecemartin is offline
YouTube Creator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 1,776
[Deleted]

Last edited by Reecemartin; Nov 18, 2020 at 1:19 AM.
     
     
  #8514  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 4:24 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
I hope your incorrect. Once the project moves forward it will have a momentum all its own, especially given it is a provincial government/translink project. A new council coming in not going to want to revisit decisions that have been made and contracts that have been signed.

The site-C is a good example of this. The project was at the point of no return when a new government came in to place. After much talking, study evaluation they came to consultation there was choice but to move forward.
There are no contracts yet and with the recent Corrigan nonsense a solid decision may not come until after the Vancouver election anyway.

10th cut and cover or a bored tunnel if the existing infrastructure necessitates the cost. It would be great to walk from Broadway down only a couple steps to a subway under 10th. and not have to deal with a long staircase down. (especially if you are running late)
     
     
  #8515  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 5:22 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 18,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
I hope your incorrect. Once the project moves forward it will have a momentum all its own, especially given it is a provincial government/translink project. A new council coming in not going to want to revisit decisions that have been made and contracts that have been signed.

The site-C is a good example of this. The project was at the point of no return when a new government came in to place. After much talking, study evaluation they came to consultation there was choice but to move forward.
Site C is an entirely different situation. It would be akin to already having boring machines in the ground when the election occurs and contemplating whether to stop the project or not.

The GMB project was further along when the NDP took power than this project is now and look what happened.

Seriously, it is starting to get infuriating that out of all the major transit / road projects proposed for our region (Broadway Subway, Langley RT, Pattullo Bridge, GMT, and the Surrey LRT) the least worthy of them all (Surrey LRT) seems to be the closest to becoming a reality...
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #8516  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 5:24 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Site C is an entirely different situation. It would be akin to already having boring machines in the ground when the election occurs and contemplating whether to stop the project or not.

The GMB project was further along when the NDP took power than this project is now and look what happened.

Seriously, it is starting to get infuriating that out of all the major transit / road projects proposed for our region (Broadway Subway, Langley RT, Pattullo Bridge, GMT, and the Surrey LRT) the least worthy of them all (Surrey LRT) seems to be the closest to becoming a reality...
Oh, so you mean what the PCs did to the Eglinton Subway in the 1990s?
     
     
  #8517  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 5:36 AM
AMTDGT AMTDGT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
'......
cut-and-cover on 10th? that could happen assuming the ground conditions/utilities allow for it. if the only reason for it not being cut-and-cover on 10th is the bike-way, then i could see them doing that happening. such as if the NPA gets elected.
I assume they are still there, but the main East/West telephone underground cable route was on 10th avenue all the way to UBC. (note the offices on 10th near Fraser, Yew, Tolmie etc.

The route dated back to at least WW2 when the communications network for the wreck beach 🞵🞵🞵 emplacements and other military infrastructure ran through the ducts.

As far as bike lanes are concerned, one would have to assume with moonbeam gone, common sense would prevail. Detouring bikers onto 11th or 12th during construction is not a big deal especially when it is viewed from the positive environmental / social impact of the completed project.
     
     
  #8518  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 7:02 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMTDGT View Post
...
As far as bike lanes are concerned, one would have to assume with moonbeam gone, common sense would prevail. Detouring bikers onto 11th or 12th during construction is not a big deal especially when it is viewed from the positive environmental / social impact of the completed project.
That comes down to marketing.... Explain how the skytrain cars have special space allocated for bikes. It is being built to support the need of the bikers in the community. Moving pedestrian commuters and students along the Broadway corridor is a minor secondary benefit.
     
     
  #8519  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 6:53 PM
a very long weekend's Avatar
a very long weekend a very long weekend is offline
dazzle me
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: 94109
Posts: 824
Two great things about doing cut and cover on 10th, aside from decreased depth of stations: (1) lower cost could lead to larger stations with multiple entrances; (2) a great opportunity for a wholesale high rise TOD rezoning of 10th, including commercial.
__________________
"Yes, we destroyed the planet. But in one brief, beautiful moment, we created tremendous value for shareholders."
     
     
  #8520  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 8:56 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,167
Again, the telecomms utilities are all on 10th - couldn't put them on Broadway at the time, because of the streetcar - and relocating them is a significant increase in capital cost. Same reason (among others) that LRT down 16th is unworkable.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:23 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.