Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartphilly
^
Playing devi's advocate. What about our human capital that specializes in technology? Will Amazon be able to fill up the positions here with local talent or will it have to be imported from other states? Most people factor where they live based on their relationships with others if they are deciding to leave a current job to a new job/new city. If you don't have a job or looking for a new opportunity, that's a different story. I'm sure a number of position that Amazon is looking to hire will require experience. So, there's a breakdown of these groups that Amazon needs to consider too. What good is a locale if you can't run the organization without the human capital. Other cities might have an advantage over us on this. And, I'm sure Amazon is putting this up high in its priority in selecting its next HQ city.
|
Atlanta has better human capital? Austin?
Even if on average those cities have say, a higher attainment of masters degrees, they're much smaller metros. Thus, in absolute terms, the local talent pool is no more accessible.
If Austin is a metro of 2 million people and has a bachelors degree attainment rate of 40% (making this up) relative to us at 35% in a metro of 6 million (again, making this up), that means there are 800,000 people in the Austin metro with Bachelors Degrees and 2.1 million bachelor degree holders here.
On paper, you could argue Austin has a "more educated" workforce. What's the fucking point if net net, we still have 1.3 million more relevant people accessible nearby already?
For a "more educated" city like Austin, given the size differential, they would have to be 40 or 50 points ahead of us in any given metric related to education (which we would all agree is impossible) to have an equivalent number of captive people in situ.