Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking
The concern is not that it is built to the property line...That is what should happen...The concern is what happens at the ground floor. It appears that all the focus is to the centre of the site and the actual streets become dead zones....hopefully that is not the case, but if it is, the design deserves to be criticized....sacrificing two major streets for an internal plaza is not good design....it will do what portage place did in that case.
but hopefully the street edges are not treated as the backs of the buildings and it is all good.
|
Correct in principle, but who, in our tight market, is going to spend extra money for "street presence" that is already thoroughly killed by City Place on Hargrave? TNS was preaching rental premium of up to
$7psf higher than leading office buildings (ie 360 Main post re-glazing) than from commercial office tenants to make this project feasible. SEVEN.
That's completely unprecedented, and almost a
100% higher over some very good downtown office space. I'm not sure they have entrances and such there, but by golly if they don't, I understand.
I get the theory you're advocating, it isn't "good design", but if there is NO current street presence on Hargrave and Graham, and they actually are building their project on the premise of public plaza space. All those dollars are going into the middle. There isn't much to salvage on the street, but a blank slate in the middle of the lot itself.
However, as mentioned before, Cartlton should see a big boost, and that corner views Hydro better than TNS views the MTS centre.