HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9721  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 2:36 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,393
^Um, how would they know what year a building is from, to know if it should be reviewed?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9722  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 3:19 PM
KWillChicago's Avatar
KWillChicago KWillChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,146
You guys got more intel than me but I heard from a little birdie that they may be some "big" news without details for the intersection of michigan/randolph. Could that hotel/condo project from like 7 years ago be starting up again?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9723  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 3:38 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
^Um, how would they know what year a building is from, to know if it should be reviewed?
I'm assuming the City has records, do they not?
__________________
[SIZE="1"]I like travel and photography - check out my [URL="https://www.flickr.com/photos/ericmathiasen/"]Flickr page[/URL].
CURRENT GEAR: Nikon Z6, Nikon Z 14-30mm f4 S, Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S, Nikon 50mm f1.4G
STOLEN GEAR: (during riots of 5/30/2020) Nikon D750, Nikon 14-24mm F2.8G, Nikon 85mm f1.8G, Nikon 50mm f1.4D
[/SIZE]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9724  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 4:05 PM
PKDickman PKDickman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
It seems like they should take three years and review buildings, say, 40+ years old, so 1980 or earlier, and then every year after 2020 just review one years worth of buildings to stay current. Then on a case-by-case basis they could mark certain buildings that aren't added to the preservation list at age 40 for re-evaluation at age 50 to see if opinions have changed.
To what end and from what source of funding.

You and I might consider these mid-century masterpieces in need of protection, but the CHRS confers dubious protection. The demo delay is of little use except as a last resort.
The survey was done in response to a federal mandate and paid for with federal grants. Its value as a planning document ceased almost as soon as it was published and holds as much sway as the WPA Survey of land use.

If these are in need of landmark protection, it is up to the public to identify them and make a case for their designation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9725  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 4:24 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,443
Speaking of preservation, there's a 90 day demo delay for a Daniel Burnham designed beautiful Terra Cotta and white brick warehouse in the West Loop. Hurray for Chicago! We really know how to move forward as a city!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9726  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 4:42 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is online now
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,749
Crubed announced yesterday that this lovely curvy building was approved by the Evanston City council, over protests by NIMBY shitheads:


(Image from article)
https://chicago.curbed.com/2017/11/15/16653948/evanston-high-rise-apartment-development
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9727  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 4:52 PM
maru2501's Avatar
maru2501 maru2501 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWillChicago View Post
You guys got more intel than me but I heard from a little birdie that they may be some "big" news without details for the intersection of michigan/randolph. Could that hotel/condo project from like 7 years ago be starting up again?

I had been wondering about this, in the current market environment. Seems like should nearly be an automatic
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9728  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 5:10 PM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWillChicago View Post
You guys got more intel than me but I heard from a little birdie that they may be some "big" news without details for the intersection of michigan/randolph. Could that hotel/condo project from like 7 years ago be starting up again?
Probably this?

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/realestat...-story-high-rise-next-to-millennium-park

Unless you mean the Lake/Stetson site...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9729  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 5:12 PM
gebs's Avatar
gebs gebs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: South Loop
Posts: 809
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
Crubed announced yesterday that this lovely curvy building was approved by the Evanston City council, over protests by NIMBY shitheads:
I used to go to Nevin's pub as a student back in the day for events and once for a Guided by Voices concert. That said, this is a much better use of that L-adjacent lot. Seeing Evanston grow like this is great -- it's definitely one of the "suburbs" that I would happily move to.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9730  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 5:14 PM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
Speaking of preservation, there's a 90 day demo delay for a Daniel Burnham designed beautiful Terra Cotta and white brick warehouse in the West Loop. Hurray for Chicago! We really know how to move forward as a city!
Do you know the address?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9731  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 5:38 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by ithakas View Post
Probably this?

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/realestat...-story-high-rise-next-to-millennium-park

Unless you mean the Lake/Stetson site...
Hmm, I'm doubtful on this one
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9732  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 5:42 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
I'm assuming the City has records, do they not?
Maybe for the last decade.

I guess someone could go over to UIC and go through 800,000 microfilmed building permits, but the address used at the time will often not match what we now know it as.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9733  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 5:44 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by ithakas View Post
Do you know the address?
1217 W Washington, the Chicago Machinery Building.


Preservation Chicago
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9734  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 6:47 PM
pilsenarch pilsenarch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 895
wow, the loss of that building would be a crime... sad!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9735  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 6:54 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
^ Hopefully they tear it down for some parking. Finally can get some friggin parking in this hood!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9736  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 8:28 PM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 664
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilsenarch View Post
wow, the loss of that building would be a crime... sad!
Would like to see this remain, but a related question: What is the particular challenge or cost to producing terracotta detailing these days? This strikes me as something that we should be able to do at reasonable cost with today's technology, at least if it could became fashionable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9737  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 8:59 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,912
Why would anyone want to tear down that beauty?

Why not preserve the facade? It would look graceful with several stories of glass above it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9738  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2017, 9:41 PM
MultiModal MultiModal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 159
So I just called the owners and they were being very coy about the situation and said that the retail space is not available because it is currently going through permitting. Then I blatantly asked if they were tearing it down and was just told that it depends on a number of factors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9739  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2017, 4:22 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
Eleven40 - 1140 S Wabash

November 13, 2017

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9740  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2017, 4:23 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
1407 on Michigan - 1407 S Michigan

November 13, 2017

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:09 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.