Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias
It seems like they should take three years and review buildings, say, 40+ years old, so 1980 or earlier, and then every year after 2020 just review one years worth of buildings to stay current. Then on a case-by-case basis they could mark certain buildings that aren't added to the preservation list at age 40 for re-evaluation at age 50 to see if opinions have changed.
|
To what end and from what source of funding.
You and I might consider these mid-century masterpieces in need of protection, but the CHRS confers dubious protection. The demo delay is of little use except as a last resort.
The survey was done in response to a federal mandate and paid for with federal grants. Its value as a planning document ceased almost as soon as it was published and holds as much sway as the WPA Survey of land use.
If these are in need of landmark protection, it is up to the public to identify them and make a case for their designation.