HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 5:44 PM
McBane McBane is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbanthusiat View Post
Not terribly surprising for this kind of land at this location. Developing with an institution like the Catholic Church pretty much guarantees success on the project for the developer. Institutions can make a long-term commitment to the project's success and can tolerate short-term losses, unlike for-profit investors. That's why the LDS was able to do such a good job with 1601 Vine. Good taste is one part of it of course, but the church isn't going anywhere, and if they want the lot to be developed, it will get developed one way or another because they're in it for the long-haul.
It's a very different scenario actually, although I hope the outcome netshigh quality work

The Archdiocese is leasing the property to a developer. And, other than selecting the best developer and their plans, the church has nothing to do with the design or development. The Alexander, on the other hand, was developed by a private RE development arm of the LDS church.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.