HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #721  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2017, 5:47 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
Big sigh. Again what a waste of good space, and the inefficient use of financial investment. That's the "we-love-our-status-quo-and-refuse-to-change" City of Vancouver zoning bylaw for you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #722  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2017, 3:00 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,509
1510 W 6th Avenue (Zonda Nellis) - November 11th 2017

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
My photos -










Nearing completion
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #723  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 4:55 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,509
Choklit Park Terraces (1107 West 7th Ave) - November 11th, 2017

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post






Just one more floor left. I think this will be the last one I'll be able to get with the view still intact.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #724  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 7:12 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,509
2109 E Hastings Open House












Here is the little project that will be replacing the Dairy Queen at Hastings and Lakewood.
As you may notice in the model the top floors are using a wood-like material, while brick is cladding the lower floors. This extends to the interior, as the top two floors will be wood-frame, while the lower ones will be concrete. The overall design is something encouraged by the area plan.

The south facade has a faux frontage created by the brick wall to help relate to the neighbourhood, to create a sound barrier and sun shading for the balconies in behind. Meanwhile, the north face has been stepped, and includes a lot of greenery to improve it's relation to the character homes to the north.

A resident of one of the home across the alleyway, an elderly woman, attended the open house and was quite distraught, exclaiming that the new development will drive her to the grave. While I think it would be a very cold person that wouldn't feel their heart twinge at such a scene, I really do hope she realizes that the future of the area means such growth is needed. Ideally, I hope she finds when the project is completed that the building will be a good neighbour, and not the monster she fears; At worst, I hope she realizes that the equity of her current home is such that it would allow her to find happiness in another area of the region that isn't experiencing change at such a fast pace.

That said, as the project is a rental building, and apparently close to the residence of a member of Abundant Housing, I suspect this one will see a lot of support when it comes up at a public hearing.

http://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applications/2109ehastings/index.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #725  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 10:44 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
A resident of one of the homes across the alleyway, an elderly woman, attended the open house and was quite distraught, exclaiming that the new development will drive her to the grave.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Last edited by logan5; Nov 13, 2017 at 10:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #726  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2017, 4:54 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,509
1535 - 1557 Grant St /// 2601 East Hastings Pre-Application Open House Events



Additionally

There is a second event that I don't have the material sheet for. While I'm pretty sure I have the details right, I thought I would put that qualifier out there. The info below is all I have on it.

It's a pre-application open house for 2601 East Hastings.
This one is also on November 15, and the location is Dr. A.R. Lord Elementary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #727  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2017, 12:39 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,489
Notice how the one white window frame on the dark background (older building on the left) has more presence / punch than the new façade?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
My photos -


Nearing completion
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #728  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2017, 6:22 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post


Additionally

There is a second event that I don't have the material sheet for. While I'm pretty sure I have the details right, I thought I would put that qualifier out there. The info below is all I have on it.

It's a pre-application open house for 2601 East Hastings.
This one is also on November 15, and the location is Dr. A.R. Lord Elementary.

The 4-storey rezoning of the area has yet to be enacted, so I see they're really jumping the gun on the area's rezoning plan, and even then, going mid-block off Commercial Drive even for a 6-storey... I see why they hired Virginia Bird to do some community relations. Interesting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #729  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2017, 6:24 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,790
Feathered Friend, what was the community reaction otherwise at that Open House for the old DQ site on Hastings?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #730  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2017, 7:35 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,790
I bet the City will cut them back with setbacks on the SW corner too. Which is a shame, because it usually looks better than everything on the whole block stepped back at the 5th level. Everything looks the same in the end and odd.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #731  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2017, 9:43 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post


Nearing completion
This building looks like crap.
__________________
In the heart of a busy metropolis skyscrapers are a vivid reminder of the constant yearning of the human spirit to rise to God
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #732  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2017, 7:37 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
The 4-storey rezoning of the area has yet to be enacted, so I see they're really jumping the gun on the area's rezoning plan, and even then, going mid-block off Commercial Drive even for a 6-storey... I see why they hired Virginia Bird to do some community relations. Interesting.
Actually, as this site is in the Britannia-Woodlands subarea, heights of up 6 stories are already called for in the plan.

http://vancouver.ca/files/cov/grandview-woodland-community-plan.pdf
page 75 (79 of the pdf)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Feathered Friend, what was the community reaction otherwise at that Open House for the old DQ site on Hastings?
I would say that, aside from that one individual, the few in attendance seemed more curious than anything else. So, I would call the mood of those in attendance that of light acceptance bordering on indifference. I caveat that with the fact that I didn't arrive there until almost 6 pm.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #733  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2017, 6:11 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
This building looks like crap.
Of course it does. Vancouver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #734  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2017, 7:03 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
Actually, as this site is in the Britannia-Woodlands subarea, heights of up 6 stories are already called for in the plan.

http://vancouver.ca/files/cov/grandview-woodland-community-plan.pdf
page 75 (79 of the pdf)



I would say that, aside from that one individual, the few in attendance seemed more curious than anything else. So, I would call the mood of those in attendance that of light acceptance bordering on indifference. I caveat that with the fact that I didn't arrive there until almost 6 pm.
I know the townhome upzoning has been enacted, but I thought the 4-6 storey upzoning for the area wasn't being enacted until fall 2018. They're still in community consultation about enacting this plan, if I recall. My architecture firm has a site here and we're playing the waiting game on a 4-storey site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #735  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2017, 8:07 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,509
1535 - 1557 Grant St - Pre App Info

So, as predicted by some here, the open house was a "fun" affair. First, and more importantly, here's the info on the project.



















As you can see from the stats and renderings, this Passive Home is a rather impressive project that, if it goes forward, will set a very good standard for buildings to come in the area. I'm really happy this area won't be as restricted as the designs on Cambie have been. However, one restriction the city asked for was an additional 10 foot setback at the north end of the property, as they want to eventually build a laneway here (when the homes across the way come up for development, they will also be asked for a 10 foot setback).

Though there wasn't a floorplate board, the architect informed me that they chose to locate the family units on the western side of the building to insure that they would have the best views. There was also an attempt to hide the elevator core within the mass of the building as much as possible so to further minimize the impact on the neighbours. In addition, the parking ramp and lobby are placed so to provide the best possible access to people of all abilities. While the ground floor units have outside doors, I was given the impression that the main access to those units will be from the interior. Unfortunately, given it's location, this great little rental 100 project is very unlikely to see a public hearing anytime soon; It is almost election year, and the political courage just isn't there.

That's the perfect transition to the open house, which felt more than a little tense when I arrived. With an attendance of over 70 people, the major gripes form those opposed were about parking; Both the amount provided in the building and concerns about future street parking. Another common gripe was that the project is simply too tall/dense for the neighbourhood. That said, those opposed were still generally respectful, at least with me. Sadly,// While my experience was positive, I heard that at one point a crowd of roughly 20 people had cornered the architect by one of the boards. They peppered the poor person with a barrage of questions, and when they went to provide an answer, another member of the group would interrupt with a different point. This went on for a while before dispersing, so it's not like the opposition was completely well-behaved. I understand change is hard, but it is silly for people in that area, who were well involved with the area plan, to claim that a neighbourhood so close to the city core shouldn't see this density, and that the city is forcing it upon them. Oh, one last thing, three of the four homes that are being replaced by this project sold for about $1.5 mil, with the fourth going for over $1.7m early this year.

If anyone wants to write about this project, you can email the address on the notification card I posted earlier.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #736  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2017, 5:56 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,790
E-mail I got from the City on Grandview-Woodlands:

"Only the RT (duplex) zone has been approved, with an enactment scheduled for early 2018. Staff will be working on the Townhouse and 4-storey district schedules next, and expect to be out in early 2018 to engage with the public on these new zones.

Following that, they would have to be refined, then presented to Council for referral to public hearing… and then (subject to approval) enacted. We are anticipating these would also take place in 2018, but the exact timing has yet to be worked out."

I think they're making their way up that scale to enact the heigher buildings in district schedules. So for that rezoning on Grant St. they're definitely along the lines of the future outlook of the community, the community can still fight its targets for height and density and setbacks, and parking which is a bummer. I guess at the moment the tallest is 4-storeys.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #737  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2017, 6:03 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,790
The developer and architect did a real savy and sneaky board for the Area context and what they're going in with as a CD-1. Not sure if they had a board for RM-4... but under it's existing zoning it's 11m compared to their proposed 21m. Smart move to leave that bit out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #738  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2017, 8:36 PM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
E-mail I got from the City on Grandview-Woodlands:

"Only the RT (duplex) zone has been approved, with an enactment scheduled for early 2018. Staff will be working on the Townhouse and 4-storey district schedules next, and expect to be out in early 2018 to engage with the public on these new zones.

Following that, they would have to be refined, then presented to Council for referral to public hearing… and then (subject to approval) enacted. We are anticipating these would also take place in 2018, but the exact timing has yet to be worked out."

I think they're making their way up that scale to enact the heigher buildings in district schedules. So for that rezoning on Grant St. they're definitely along the lines of the future outlook of the community, the community can still fight its targets for height and density and setbacks, and parking which is a bummer. I guess at the moment the tallest is 4-storeys.
You know... you were absolutely right. I had a massive brain fart, and was totally in the wrong. I still feel the neighbourhood shouldn't expect anything different than the accepted plan, but sadly every project still needs a rezoning. I just wish council had the courage to enact mass rezoning when they pass an area plan, but the waste of time that is the constant CD1 rezonings along the Cambie Corridor shows otherwise. I get it's a political survival thing, but yeesh, it feels like every Councillor should have been forced to go as red tape for Halloween.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #739  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 6:00 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,509
2601-2615 E Hastings + 360-380 Penticton
























I took the 95 down to this open house before heading to the Grant St project; I may have an addiction to boxed Starbucks coffee. In contrast to the other project, this one was sparsely attended. I would say no more than a couple dozen passed through in the time I was there. Of those who did attend, I would say the reaction was muted and that they came mostly out of curiosity.

As for the project, its also pretty straightforward, in a good way. The design retains a portion of the old heritage building, with the current duplex being converted into a restaurant. The doors of the building will become windows, while the existing window will become a door. The city apparently had expressed a desire to see the southwest corner of the heritage building incorporated into the project, but agreed that the livability of the units and functionality of the CRUs would be too greatly impacted. However, the new and old are tied together with the red highlighting and some fine detailing. If you look carefully at the pillars of the new portion, they contain the same diamond/hourglass design as the heritage building. This project may not have that wow factor like some other designs, but it does a good job at matching up the heritage style, and feels like a good fit for the block.

The comment cards had no special questions, so you can email your thoughts to [email protected]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #740  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 6:03 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,565
There's a heritage building buried in that bland mess? Seriously, why even bother, its the worst kind of facadism.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:47 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.