Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician
Well we definitely disagree then.
To me, sprawl is less about the political entity that oversees municipalities (whether 1 or 100) and more about land use, layouts, density, auto-versus pedestrian orientation, etc.
|
I've speculated that the Washington DC region has been able to densify their suburbs precisely because power is concentrated at the county level in both Virginia and Maryland - Montgomery, PG, Arlington, and Fairfax. County governments have less incentive to listen to individual neighbor complaints.
But they're only able to do this because there is a vague, broad political consensus around public transportation and TOD - and in Maryland, there are even greenbelt laws to preserve prime farmland from development.
In a region like Houston, the consensus is around continual sprawl development and highway expansion, but the centralization of government in City of Houston/Harris County also makes this easier politically. Compare this to Chicago, where the region is split over seven counties and each county government is relatively weak compared to municipal governments.
A fragmented government is going to be dysfunctional and ineffective, regardless of whether the goal is perfect urbanism or perfect sprawl.