Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgrath618
1. I can't back this up, this is solely an opinion.
2. Chicago has lost over 100,000 people since 2009
3. Chicago also has more shootings than any city. Ever. Their murder rate is over twice the global average.
I apologize to the mods if I've made this a city v city discussion. JJV, please PM me if you'd like to continue this debate.
|
Oh god please just stop. Yes, you are turning this into City vs City and you are doing it with bad data analysis.
To say that Chicago is hemorrhaging population is ridiculous. The population change has been up and down over the past decade, but the city has gained population in the estimates since the 2010 census, but that isn't the same as hemorrhaging population. Comparing two data points doesn't give you a trend, much less one with such an over the top connotation as "hemorrhaging"
Also, I hate to break it to you, but Philadelphia had a higher violent crime rate last year than Chicago. There was a pretty drastic spike in the murder rate in Chicago, but prior to that Philly and Chi had pretty comparable murder rates. Both cities have improved drastically in terms of violent crime and both are way down from the recent peak two or three decades ago.
I love Philly, but trying to boost our city by putting another down is just plain wrong. Especially a city like Chicago that we have so much in common with. If anything we should be supporting each other on here, not getting in 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 contests over who's lost the greatest percentage of their population since the 60's.
EDIT: For the record, I'm not trying to push this further into city v city. I'd love for Amazon to choose Philly and think we've got a great shot at it. But let's please not piss on other legitimate bids out of spite. We're better than that.