HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3461  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2017, 4:13 AM
Roger Strong's Avatar
Roger Strong Roger Strong is offline
Speak the truth, then run
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 896
Spherical Image: True North Center
Camera: Ricoh Theta V
Taken by me today from the parkade to the north.

Clicking on the placeholder image below should take you to the viewer page. You can zoom in, pan around, go to full screen etc.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3462  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2017, 4:55 AM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,764
Interesting!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3463  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2017, 11:07 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
I was probably the one who launched speculation on the whole Chipman/Archdiocese connection and yes, it was total speculation on my part. But further to lilwayne's point, I don't think it's all that farfetched... you would think that Longboat (or whichever company is developing TNS) would want to prevent any neighbouring developments from having an adverse effect on TNS, and given the family's involvement with the church at a fairly high level, it's not hard to imagine that they'd also be broadly supportive of the Archdiocese's goals.

One way of doing that is to support the Archdiocese's project in a way that lends itself to a win-win outcome. Perhaps Longboat gets involved in such a way that leads to construction of church-owned buildings, as the odds of the project's success go up drastically with such an experienced developer in their corner. And as buzzg suggested, if those buildings end up being, say, only 6 storeys high and don't block any TNS views in the process, then all the better.

Obviously I defer to those who are in a place to categorically know one way or another whether or not the Chipmans are involved, but on the face of it, I'd say it's not entirely unlikely that they might be. There is a certain convergence of interests here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3464  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2017, 11:22 PM
The Jabroni's Avatar
The Jabroni The Jabroni is offline
Go kicky fast, okay!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Donut Dominion
Posts: 3,380
I got you, fam!

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3465  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2017, 12:06 AM
Roger Strong's Avatar
Roger Strong Roger Strong is offline
Speak the truth, then run
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 896
Spherical Image: True North Center, taken yesterday.

Clicking on the placeholder image below will take you to the viewer page. You can zoom in, pan around, go to full screen etc.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3466  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 5:56 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 15,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I was probably the one who launched speculation on the whole Chipman/Archdiocese connection and yes, it was total speculation on my part. But further to lilwayne's point, I don't think it's all that farfetched... you would think that Longboat (or whichever company is developing TNS) would want to prevent any neighbouring developments from having an adverse effect on TNS, and given the family's involvement with the church at a fairly high level, it's not hard to imagine that they'd also be broadly supportive of the Archdiocese's goals.

One way of doing that is to support the Archdiocese's project in a way that lends itself to a win-win outcome. Perhaps Longboat gets involved in such a way that leads to construction of church-owned buildings, as the odds of the project's success go up drastically with such an experienced developer in their corner. And as buzzg suggested, if those buildings end up being, say, only 6 storeys high and don't block any TNS views in the process, then all the better.

Obviously I defer to those who are in a place to categorically know one way or another whether or not the Chipmans are involved, but on the face of it, I'd say it's not entirely unlikely that they might be. There is a certain convergence of interests here.
Speculation is fine, but it has become accepted on this forum that just because it is next door Chipman is involved. Why would they not say they are involved? It may not be far fetched that they become involved, but it's also not far fetched to say they aren't...they were not when the renderings were released. Why would they be secretly part of it? Why wouldn't they use their name to build excitement and attract interest? They are not shy on publicity. If they were starting a third major block of development why not say they are?

Again. I have worked with this church in the past. I know who is driving this. They are the kind to throw a rendering in the air just to hope it sticks on something. Their process is not how real projects get done. You don't start with renderings. You start with who the money is.

Maybe the scheme attracts an investor but we can't treat it as real until someone does. Maybe Longboat decides to partner with the church but is crazy to assume they will just because we think they want control of the entire area. They didn't bother buying buildings on the same block as CentrePoint. They have a lot on their plate just trying to complete and fill TNS.

We can talk about the church thing, but until there is an announcement of a developer, let's not make our own conclusions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3467  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 1:18 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
I'm not paying the church proposal heed until, as TV asserts, we hear from a developer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3468  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 3:54 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 3,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I was probably the one who launched speculation on the whole Chipman/Archdiocese connection and yes, it was total speculation on my part. But further to lilwayne's point, I don't think it's all that farfetched... you would think that Longboat (or whichever company is developing TNS) would want to prevent any neighbouring developments from having an adverse effect on TNS, and given the family's involvement with the church at a fairly high level, it's not hard to imagine that they'd also be broadly supportive of the Archdiocese's goals.
No, most recently it was from buzzg on Oct 2. And the way it was stated, it was more than speculation:


Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
I got word from someone quite close to the operation that TNS will include a 5th tower, likely to be announced by spring, if not sooner. He said he had every indication that this will be the rumoured new Catholic church building, and that it will be an official part of TNS, with TN fully involved in development.

This could help explain why Tower 1 ended up being built right up to the church property, and also why the raised "patio" area at the SW corner of plaza is open to the church property... Could easily be integrated/connected to the new Tower FIVE.

So excited to see what this could become.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3469  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 3:59 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,373
Sorry for spreading rumours folks. I must've misunderstood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3470  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 4:00 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,373
Thanks for the photos Roger! You'll need to get in the square and take another 360 once complete!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3471  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 5:32 PM
Roger Strong's Avatar
Roger Strong Roger Strong is offline
Speak the truth, then run
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
Thanks for the photos Roger! You'll need to get in the square and take another 360 once complete!!
You're welcome!

That was my first experiment with spherical images. Looking at the results I learned a lot for my next outing.

Taking a spherical image is like taking an x-ray, in that after setting up the shot you look for something to step behind before taking the picture. I took pictures of the site from a bunch of other directions, but I wasn't able to remove myself from those. Perhaps with an image editor.

The "before" shots for SkyCity haven't been updated in years. I might wander by and take a spherical "before" shot. And in a few years an 8K resolution spherical "before" shot. And a holographic "before" shot a few years after that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3472  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 6:36 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,206
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Strong View Post
And a holographic "before" shot a few years after that.
Any chance you create a holographic model of the SkyCity Centre and have it projected life size onto the site?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3473  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 8:10 PM
Roger Strong's Avatar
Roger Strong Roger Strong is offline
Speak the truth, then run
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
Any chance you create a holographic model of the SkyCity Centre and have it projected life size onto the site?
To keep it realistic I'd have to project an image of a big hole in the ground for eight years.

This also simulates the investor experience.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3474  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2017, 1:08 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 8,625


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3475  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2017, 5:04 PM
Stryfe's Avatar
Stryfe Stryfe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 42
Lots of glass!

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3476  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2017, 8:52 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,373
I like the fins the put on the glass within the square. I assume this is a sun shade. Or just looks cool haha
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3477  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2017, 8:54 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,373
A couple photos as the tower is now out of cam's view. Forming columns on the 17th floor to support the roof. Not sure what type of mechanicals levels are above. The top floor is noticeably taller than the previous floors.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3478  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2017, 9:34 PM
Roger Strong's Avatar
Roger Strong Roger Strong is offline
Speak the truth, then run
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
A couple photos as the tower is now out of cam's view.
Thanks!

I wonder of the glass installed on the south side implies an upper limit to the height of whatever gets added to the church property.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3479  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2017, 2:59 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 8,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
That chipman involvement in the church site was a fabrication of this web site...I believe the connection was chipman goes to church.
i'm not reading into this much but In the initial video presentation they had a the cathedral site highlighted as part of the development. Seems as though a sliver of TNS was supposed to spill over onto that site.





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3480  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2017, 6:16 AM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
I like the fins the put on the glass within the square. I assume this is a sun shade. Or just looks cool haha
I've been wondering if these "fins" actually serve a purpose or if it's a style trend because they seem to be popping up on every new build/renovation. IMO the ones on the new PSB kind of look bad because from a distance you don't even see the glass.

Would have been cool if they went with the ones in the original render that gradually transitioned from red to yellow.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WpG_GuY View Post
i'm not reading into this much but In the initial video presentation they had a the cathedral site highlighted as part of the development. Seems as though a sliver of TNS was supposed to spill over onto that site.
To be fair, those are the initial renders and the current ones on the website don't show that. Appears to just be another entrance to the skywalk level, likely not worth it for the church to give up their parking lot for that lol. Probably just there in this case to make the render look better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:35 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.