Quote:
Originally Posted by roman
Sorry I did not mean that the city should build infrastructure for the oil and gas industry. I meant that we should be looking to build city infrastructure projects and amenities for the citizens of Calgary. I am definitely for diversification and bringing new different businesses to Calgary, but we also have to work in harmony with our existing business leaders to ensure that they are still invested in the local economy and to keep them invested in the local economy and welcome their ideas and ensure that Calgary is once again a business friendly environment.
|
Lovely sentiments, in the abstract.
Do you mind being more specific? I feel like you're referencing arena/stadium, or Olympics, or both, but honestly can't tell. Arguably, strong civic financial support for either of these could result in
driving away businesses, because funding them probably results in higher property taxes in the long run. And I'm certainly hearing from many corners that increased property taxes are a problem for many businesses in the city.
If you mean something other than arena/stadium/Olympics, I don't think you'll get much argument out of most people that we should reduce red tape, make it easier to guide business through regulatory processes, etc. But if you really want to have a large change, it's hard to ignore the question of, "are business property taxes too high, proportionately, compared to residential?" I honestly don't know what the correct proportion is, but if you change that proportion, residential tax payers aren't going to love that either. Does any candidate have the courage to admit this is what they're going to have to do, unless they merely want to tinker at the edges?