HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7481  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2017, 9:41 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,001
Also of interest in the RPS application is that the previous permit expired in 2016 and they did nothing to renew. Also the Heritage Community opposed the renewal for obvious reasons.

This little tidbit was buried in the materials:
Quote:
Currently
RPS is considering facility options which may include an option to relocate RPS headquarter
facility to a new location.
I have heard recent rumbling about this, with the Taylor Field site being mentioned as a possible location.
     
     
  #7482  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2017, 11:40 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Also of interest in the RPS application is that the previous permit expired in 2016 and they did nothing to renew. Also the Heritage Community opposed the renewal for obvious reasons.

This little tidbit was buried in the materials:
I have heard recent rumbling about this, with the Taylor Field site being mentioned as a possible location.
Can't let Saskatoon look better than Regina now could we.

They should just buy the bus depot and be done with it.
     
     
  #7483  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2017, 11:40 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
RPS looks like it is getting an extension to 2024 for its "temporary" parking lot on Sask Dr. This is despite the fact that they breached the terms of the original permit and the Bylaw that required screening and landscaping. See the link below to see this beauty.

https://www.google.ca/maps/place/1505+Sa...fa0a4118!8m2!3d50.4518779!4d-104.6022539

The new proposed approval says:

That a landscape plan be submitted, approved by the City of Regina and consistent with perimeter screening requirements of the Regina Zoning Bylaw No. 9250. The landscape shall be installed by September 15, 2018.
Just wait until Namerind is approved forever.
     
     
  #7484  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2017, 12:35 AM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rueannatta
Posts: 2,597
o of interest in the RPS application is that the previous permit expired in 2016 and they did nothing to renew. Also the Heritage Community opposed the renewal for obvious reasons.

This little tidbit was buried in the materials:
Quote:
Currently
RPS is considering facility options which may include an option to relocate RPS headquarter
facility to a new location. What is RPS thank you
     
     
  #7485  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2017, 1:03 AM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefourthtower View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Also of interest in the RPS application is that the previous permit expired in 2016 and they did nothing to renew. Also the Heritage Community opposed the renewal for obvious reasons.

This little tidbit was buried in the materials:

Quote:
Currently
RPS is considering facility options which may include an option to relocate RPS headquarter
facility to a new location.
I have heard recent rumbling about this, with the Taylor Field site being mentioned as a possible location.
What is RPS thank you
You really mangled that quote...

RPS = Regina Police Service
     
     
  #7486  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2017, 1:16 AM
brithgob brithgob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
Can't let Saskatoon look better than Regina now could we.

They should just buy the bus depot and be done with it.
It’s not bigger than the current HQ, is it?

Anyway the Taylor Field idea seems rather contrary to the original aims of urban renewal.
     
     
  #7487  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2017, 1:24 AM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by brithgob View Post
It’s not bigger than the current HQ, is it?

Anyway the Taylor Field idea seems rather contrary to the original aims of urban renewal.
No it's smaller, but what I mean is that they should use it in addition to the existing building since it's directly across the street.
     
     
  #7488  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2017, 1:37 AM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
No it's smaller, but what I mean is that they should use it in addition to the existing building since it's directly across the street.
Makes sense with all the garage space
     
     
  #7489  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2017, 11:16 PM
one_brick_at_a_time's Avatar
one_brick_at_a_time one_brick_at_a_time is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Regina/Toronto
Posts: 2,389
With the Greyhound operations moving to Regina International Airport, why is there still no transit connection to the airport??? Boggles my mind that the City could be so stupid.
     
     
  #7490  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 4:28 AM
skphc08's Avatar
skphc08 skphc08 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Central
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by one_brick_at_a_time View Post
With the Greyhound operations moving to Regina International Airport, why is there still no transit connection to the airport??? Boggles my mind that the City could be so stupid.
I spoke to Ward 3 Councillor Andrew Stevens in the summer about this issue. I told him to my knowledge this may be the only "major" International Airport in Canada or perhaps North America with no transit to the airport and that I felt it was a major oversight.

He stated that its a question of funding and transit priorities and that it will be considered in the 2018 budget [$115,000/year ask and 2x30' buses @ $850,000]. He stated that the Arcola Avenue East was likely the only transit route prioritized higher than YQR service so there is some chance it could be approved for 2018.
__________________
Everything is real on this concrete and steel.
     
     
  #7491  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 5:07 AM
aberrant aberrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 246
Ya I talked to him about that last January, good to hear it is still on his radar.
     
     
  #7492  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 5:15 AM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
Can't let Saskatoon look better than Regina now could we.

They should just buy the bus depot and be done with it.
Hahaha!!!! Well, it wouldn't take much of an effort to eclipse the appearance of Saskatoon's police headquarters. Externally, it look looks akin to a 1950s Soviet era office building. (Or KGB headquarters, lol!!!)
     
     
  #7493  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 5:30 AM
BrannyMuffin BrannyMuffin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Regina
Posts: 970
Speaking of transit, the city's Facebook page had a post yesterday about some transit changes and they're looking for input. I know some of you have some great ideas.
https://www.facebook.com/CityRegina/videos/10154939131397286/
There are surveys at http://www.regina.ca/residents/transit-services/regina-transit/web-schedules/route-changes/ but these appear to be geared toward specific routes.
They'll also be at the Sandra Schmirler Leisure Centre on the 12th looking for feedback.
While the intent is to discuss specific route changes, it might be a good opportunity to be heard. They seem to be fairly interactive on the Facebook post even though most of the comments I read had nothing to do with the proposed changes. Might be worth it?
     
     
  #7494  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 2:38 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,001
Speaking of the Arcola Express Transit Route, I am mystified as to what the City just constructed at Arcola and ring Road interchange. See the red arrow in photo for the location of a new, small, dead-end lane they constructed. It is about big enough for a bus but it goes nowhere. They snarled traffic on both Arcola and Assiniboine for nearly a month to construct this tiny and seemingly useless area. That is a story for another time about how insensitive the City is to obstructing traffic.

Does anyone have a clue what they have built?

     
     
  #7495  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 2:40 PM
jigglysquishy's Avatar
jigglysquishy jigglysquishy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,326
It's supposed to allow buses to jump the lights, but I'm skeptical it works.

Arcola Express is the single greatest transit need in the city. 15 years too late, but I'm thrilled it's finally coming
     
     
  #7496  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 2:53 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by jigglysquishy View Post
It's supposed to allow buses to jump the lights, but I'm skeptical it works.

Arcola Express is the single greatest transit need in the city. 15 years too late, but I'm thrilled it's finally coming
I see. The buses will come up the 3rd far right lane and instead of turning on to the Ring Road, they will continue to this new lane and will have their own, dedicated, buses-only signal that will let them proceed on Arcola. This is actually quite ingenious as this is the single biggest bottle neck on Arcola. The City could have widened the overpass when they re-built it a few years ago, but missed the opportunity.

One issue will be left-turners off north bound Ring Road. They will need to learn to make a proper turn into the correct left hand lane to avoid colliding with the buses.
     
     
  #7497  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 4:19 PM
StealthGirl's Avatar
StealthGirl StealthGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by jigglysquishy View Post
Arcola Express is the single greatest transit need in the city. 15 years too late, but I'm thrilled it's finally coming
I'm curious to see how this works. If it turns into a park and ride, there will never be parking again at the Schmirler pool and Sunrise library branch. That parking lot is often busy as it is. I don't know how you get around that though.

City has announced plans to redevelop the Regent Park Par 3 golf course. Of their proposed uses, I suspect they might be better to put in an indoor skate park instead of housing. Kids living in that area would benefit from a rec facility.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/par-3-redevelopment-1.4326568
     
     
  #7498  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 5:12 PM
skphc08's Avatar
skphc08 skphc08 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Central
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberrant View Post
Ya I talked to him about that last January, good to hear it is still on his radar.
He stated he continues to have those conversations but he didn't give me the impression it was a done deal. Significant uncertainty for 2018.

If anyone feels strongly, they can reach out to the Councillor to share why its important. He will also suggest anyone interested in the issue should put a brief email into City Hall.

Andrew Stevens: [email protected]
John Aston: [email protected] [Director, Planning & Development, YQR]
City of Regina Request Form: https://www.regina.ca/site/contact/online-request-form/

Andrew Stevens stated that the likelihood that service to YQR will be prioritized/implemented is proportional to the perceived demand for the service. Right now the way to judge demand seems to be whether anyone writes into City Hall about this.
__________________
Everything is real on this concrete and steel.
     
     
  #7499  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 6:14 PM
Mike328 Mike328 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
I see. The buses will come up the 3rd far right lane and instead of turning on to the Ring Road, they will continue to this new lane and will have their own, dedicated, buses-only signal that will let them proceed on Arcola. This is actually quite ingenious as this is the single biggest bottle neck on Arcola. The City could have widened the overpass when they re-built it a few years ago, but missed the opportunity.

One issue will be left-turners off north bound Ring Road. They will need to learn to make a proper turn into the correct left hand lane to avoid colliding with the buses.
Will be interesting to see if it actually works. If they don't time the bridge lights properly, I do not see it helping that much.
     
     
  #7500  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 8:10 PM
Scruff Bucket's Avatar
Scruff Bucket Scruff Bucket is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike328 View Post
Will be interesting to see if it actually works. If they don't time the bridge lights properly, I do not see it helping that much.
This morning I passed by the overpass and spotted a new sign "Bus priority traffic signal" (or something like that) on the traffic light standard.

Here is the City's webpage describing how it will work.

When will this go into effect (or has it already ...)?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.