HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #10661  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2017, 8:16 PM
mojiferous mojiferous is offline
Landbarge Captain
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive View Post
Meanwhile, RTD needing to cut some fat is looking at cutting Golden's end of line frequency.

http://www.denverpost.com/2017/08/27/rtd-denver-golden-light-rail-cuts-public-transit/

Consider the (bad) timing...
Personally, I think it's horrible timing on RTD's part, but not because of the Golden circulator, which probably won't add much ridership, since Golden isn't exactly bustling. But you know what will add ridership? All the TOD that will be finished in the next couple of years:
  • 5+story apartments u/c at Federal & Colfax, Knox, Perry
  • Everything at Sloan's Lake, which is less than a mile from the Perry station
  • New townhouses and apartments at Sheridan
  • Oak street apartments
And the near-future redevelopments too:
  • Sun Valley Redevelopment
  • Federal Center TOD

We live near the Perry Station - There are at least 13 townhome projects u/c between 12th and 14th on Osceola, Perry, and Quitman.

Before this last year there hadn't been much construction going on for the length of the W since it opened in 2013... And I guess none of this construction guarantees more ridership and it probably won't have enough of a numerical impact to really matter, but more solid TOD is finally happening along the line and now RTD wants to reduce the service. That just makes it seem like no one at RTD is paying attention to changes in the neighborhoods along their transit routes.
__________________
Mojferous Industries
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10662  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2017, 8:50 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is offline
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by mojiferous View Post
Before this last year there hadn't been much construction going on for the length of the W since it opened in 2013... And I guess none of this construction guarantees more ridership and it probably won't have enough of a numerical impact to really matter, but more solid TOD is finally happening along the line and now RTD wants to reduce the service. That just makes it seem like no one at RTD is paying attention to changes in the neighborhoods along their transit routes.
Sure they are. The service reduction for the W Line is only from the Jefferson County Government Center to the Federal Center. The rest of the line would maintain 15-minute headways as there is decent ridership along the other sections.

This is the better option versus what's happening to the R Line. RTD figured out that suburban ridership is pathetic on this line and will discontinue all off-peak service south of the Florida Station. TakeFive will like the nerfing of the R Line to reflect Aurora's true nature: a city with nothing worth visiting.
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein


Last edited by wong21fr; Aug 28, 2017 at 9:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10663  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2017, 9:00 PM
mojiferous mojiferous is offline
Landbarge Captain
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr View Post
Sure they are. The service reduction for the W Line is only from the Jefferson County Government Center to the Federal Center. The rest of the line would maintain 15-minute headways as there is decent ridership along the other sections.

This is the better option versus what's happening to the R Line. RTD figured out that suburban ridership is pathetic on this line and will discontinue all off-peak service south for the Florida Station.
Ah, yep. It helps to read the article before complaining about it... That's not so bad then, because Golden's anti-growth stance means that the ridership likely will never really increase west of the Fed Center.

Ignore all my ranting!
__________________
Mojferous Industries
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10664  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2017, 10:26 PM
seventwenty's Avatar
seventwenty seventwenty is offline
I took a bus pic, CIRRUS
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Soon to be banned
Posts: 1,697
Bus lane potato photos:





Photos taken at 8th and Broadway, looking south. There is no solid use of red paint, and outside of the downtown corridor, 17th and Broadway to Colfax, and around 8th Ave and Broadway, there isn't red paint. Outside of those higher traffic areas, there is only "BUS ONLY" markings and signage, though the bus lane lights are permanently on. Drivers appeared to be confused by the bus lane, but it's only day 1. Also, I don't know if painting is completed.
__________________
The happy & obtuse bro.

"Of course you're right." Cirrus
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10665  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2017, 1:44 AM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by mojiferous View Post
But you know what will add ridership? All the TOD that will be finished in the next couple of years:
  • 5+story apartments u/c at Federal & Colfax, Knox, Perry
  • Everything at Sloan's Lake, which is less than a mile from the Perry station
  • New townhouses and apartments at Sheridan
  • Oak street apartments
Before this last year there hadn't been much construction going on for the length of the W since it opened in 2013...
I've noticed the pickup in projects along the W Line. Nice to see.

Unfortunately there's a problem with the 59 acres of prime Federal Center TOD land that was to be auctioned off. Colorado's homeless folk are suing to assert their right to live off the land out there.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10666  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2017, 2:01 AM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by seventwenty
Bus lane potato photos:
Good, good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr
discontinue all off-peak service south of the Florida Station.
Is that actually happening?
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10667  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2017, 2:45 AM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,428
^^ Ah, I missed that part.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr View Post
This is the better option versus what's happening to the R Line. RTD figured out that suburban ridership is pathetic on this line and will discontinue all off-peak service south of the Florida Station. TakeFive will like the nerfing of the R Line to reflect Aurora's true nature: a city with nothing worth visiting.
I've always divided Aurora into CCSD and Aurora Public Schools but never suggested it was a destination. For talking purposes CCSD lies mostly south of Iliff Ave.

Given that the H line now ends at Florida, Iliff was redundant but had potential to relieve traffic at Nine Mile. As I recently pointed out: not counting DUS or DIA only four stations system-wide have better ridership than Nine Mile Station.

All you're pointing out is that nobody wants to ride from Lone Tree or other stops along the SE corridor through Aurora (City Center) to the Peoria Station to jump on the A line to the airport. bunt long ago pointed out the folly of that and I figured it was likely a pipe dream. Totally agree it's a waste of assets and energy.

Meanwhile the Rockies are one run down going into the bottom of the 5th - lots of time still.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10668  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2017, 7:15 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,428
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10669  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2017, 8:21 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is offline
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive;7906083All you're pointing out is that nobody wants to ride from Lone Tree or other stops along the SE corridor through Aurora (City Center) to the Peoria Station to jump on the A line to the airport. [B
bunt[/B] long ago pointed out the folly of that and I figured it was likely a pipe dream. Totally agree it's a waste of assets and energy.
And no one in Aurora wants to use the R-Line to commute to jobs in the Tech Center. They'd rather sit with their thumbs up their asses on I-225.
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10670  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2017, 9:11 PM
The Dirt The Dirt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,215
I don't blame them. I-225 is the smoothest it's ever been since there's no more choke points. The stations are also not conducive to a Park-n-Ride model, since they don't provide a ton of parking and are right next to the highway. You're not really saving much time by parking, waiting for a train, then having to figure out the last mile connection in the DTC. The TOD model doesn't currently exist either. There's certainly some potential around some of the station, but the R line looks like it was built with the assumption that the TODs are already there. Once RTD decreases the headways to 60 minutes, no TODs will be built anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10671  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2017, 1:49 AM
mishko27 mishko27 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dirt View Post
I don't blame them. I-225 is the smoothest it's ever been since there's no more choke points. The stations are also not conducive to a Park-n-Ride model, since they don't provide a ton of parking and are right next to the highway. You're not really saving much time by parking, waiting for a train, then having to figure out the last mile connection in the DTC. The TOD model doesn't currently exist either. There's certainly some potential around some of the station, but the R line looks like it was built with the assumption that the TODs are already there. Once RTD decreases the headways to 60 minutes, no TODs will be built anyway.
Not only this, but the cost makes no sense. I am 8 miles away from my office (live in Aurora, work in DTC). My car gets over 30 mpg, while the local daily pass is $5.20... Financially, taking the R line does not make sense for me at all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10672  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2017, 7:24 AM
Denver Dweller Denver Dweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 828
Rundles Wrap Up: No parking. For shame

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10673  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2017, 4:26 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 21,214
Sounds like a conspiracy theory mixed with a profound misunderstanding of the less-parking concept and how developers think.

The concept is about reducing parking to what tenants will need, vs. building extra spaces. Sometimes it's about hitting lower price points by specifically going for residents without cars.

Developers obsess about getting the mix right. If they aim too low, rents will be low. Aim too high and project costs rise.
__________________
"Alot" has never been a word.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10674  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2017, 6:28 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr View Post
And no one in Aurora wants to use the R-Line to commute to jobs in the Tech Center. They'd rather sit with their thumbs up their asses on I-225.
Not a doctor so I can't speak to peoples butt problems.

Refining things a bit it's fair to say that lots of people who live in east CCSD - south Aurora commute to the DTC corridor. Depending on specifically where they live and their destination they'd more likely utilize either E-470 or Arapahoe Rd.

For those who live north and west of I-225 they'd more likely use Hampden Ave and if their destination is east of I-25 they can drop down via either Yosemite or Tamarac Dr/DTC Blvd. If their destination is west of I-25 they will need to ultimately use southbound I-25 unless their destination is not far from Belleview in which case they could take either Tamarac or Monaco Pkwy to Quincy and cross I-25 that way.

I agree with the points that The Dirt makes (and mishko27 too) but if one really wants or needs to use light rail going south during non-peak hours they can switch lines at Southmoor via the H Line.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10675  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2017, 6:45 PM
The Dirt The Dirt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,215
Right now, the only thing of value that the northbound R line provides is a feeder into the airport-bound A line. RTD should capitalize on this by reducing travel times. They should run an express service at most times that skips the Fitz stop (north of UCD) and several other stops in the middle of nowhere. 55+ minutes to travel from DTC to the Peoria station is a deal-breaker for many.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10676  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2017, 2:36 AM
Darius C Darius C is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dirt View Post
Right now, the only thing of value that the northbound R line provides is a feeder into the airport-bound A line. RTD should capitalize on this by reducing travel times. They should run an express service at most times that skips the Fitz stop (north of UCD) and several other stops in the middle of nowhere. 55+ minutes to travel from DTC to the Peoria station is a deal-breaker for many.
I completely agree. It is telling that airport workers are not using the R line and stick to the AT bus line instead. The AT starts fairly empty at Arapahoe Station but fills to standing room only at Nine Mile, pretty much at any time of the day. Unless the R line can cut 10-15 minutes from its current travel time, it will continue running empty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10677  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2017, 12:00 AM
CastleScott CastleScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sacramento Ca/formerly CastleRock Co
Posts: 1,055
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10678  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2017, 2:34 PM
COtoOC's Avatar
COtoOC COtoOC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO (Stapleton)
Posts: 1,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dirt View Post
Right now, the only thing of value that the northbound R line provides is a feeder into the airport-bound A line. RTD should capitalize on this by reducing travel times. They should run an express service at most times that skips the Fitz stop (north of UCD) and several other stops in the middle of nowhere. 55+ minutes to travel from DTC to the Peoria station is a deal-breaker for many.
I live in Stapleton and work off Lincoln in Lone Tree, so I've tried the R line a few times and agree. The R line north of the Aurora Mall is what really ruins the entire trip. It's just too slow through there, and poorly planned IMO.

When I drop my kids at school in Lowry, I then go down Quebec to Hampden to I25 South. That whole trip takes about an hour. If I just go get on the R line at Peoria and go to work, it takes about an hour and 10 min. door to door. Plus it cost me twice as much to pay for the train that drive my hybrid. So the only benefit is that I don't have the stress of driving.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10679  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2017, 4:57 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Airport workers should be getting heavily discounted eco-passes for the A-line. It's too expensive for workers to use, but there's logic to the high fare for non-workers. So fine, solve the problem using a special worker pass.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10680  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2017, 5:27 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is offline
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
Airport workers should be getting heavily discounted eco-passes for the A-line. It's too expensive for workers to use, but there's logic to the high fare for non-workers. So fine, solve the problem using a special worker pass.
Many do receive a heavily discounted eco-pass (looks as if it's $43/mo for City of Denver employees). But that doesn't change that the R Line is pretty much worthless as a transit line except for transferring to the A Line but only if you are boarding a station north of 6th Ave. For everyone else along the I-225/I-25 corridor it makes more sense to take the AT bus.
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:02 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.