HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #16961  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 1:26 AM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by invisibleairwaves View Post
Why would Translink want to make a Mission/Vancouver commute more attractive?
Vancouver is getting pretty expensive to live in and people are being pushed out further east, even as Surrey gets expensive too. It will basically make the two regions more connected and livable.
     
     
  #16962  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 2:33 AM
ilikeredheads ilikeredheads is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: west coast
Posts: 651
bi-directional WCE is very unlikely to happen due to following reasons:
- translink doesn't own the tracks
- freight trains have priority, which impacts service reliability and limits service frequency
- second platform is required at all intermediate stations, however this will be difficult due to lack of space, track layout limitations, or both.
- potentially low demand to justify service.
     
     
  #16963  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 3:19 AM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilikeredheads View Post
bi-directional WCE is very unlikely to happen due to following reasons:
- translink doesn't own the tracks
- freight trains have priority, which impacts service reliability and limits service frequency
- second platform is required at all intermediate stations, however this will be difficult due to lack of space, track layout limitations, or both.
- potentially low demand to justify service.
I'm pretty sure the second platform won't be required depending on frequency and passing loops.

And the bidirectional service could create demand. If you build it, they will come.
     
     
  #16964  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 3:37 AM
AMTDGT AMTDGT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by cganuelas1995 View Post
I'm pretty sure the second platform won't be required depending on frequency and passing loops.

And the bidirectional service could create demand. If you build it, they will come.
I wonder what it would cost to run another track in that right of way. My recollection is the Vancouver - PoCo leg may involve a bunch of cliff trimming and inlet back filling but other than that and the odd bridge it shouldn't be that expensive especially if CPR could use it when the WCE wasn't.

In some countries in Europe and Asia I have noticed the freights often run at night and the passenger trains during the day, which should work here.
     
     
  #16965  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 9:53 AM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMTDGT View Post
In some countries in Europe and Asia I have noticed the freights often run at night and the passenger trains during the day, which should work here.
I don't think it will work because of NIMBYs.
     
     
  #16966  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 12:43 PM
invisibleairwaves's Avatar
invisibleairwaves invisibleairwaves is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by cganuelas1995 View Post
Vancouver is getting pretty expensive to live in and people are being pushed out further east, even as Surrey gets expensive too. It will basically make the two regions more connected and livable.
Unfortunately it isn't cost-effective or practical to have Translink deliver frequent, bi-directional transit to every far-flung town in the Valley. Combine that with the various societal impacts of longer commutes and there's plenty of reasons Translink shouldn't be in the business of encouraging people to live in the FVRD and work downtown (or vice versa). Housing affordability is a serious issue and something the various levels of government need to tackle immediately but providing more incentives for urban sprawl isn't really a solution.
__________________
Reticulating Splines
     
     
  #16967  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 3:42 PM
Aroundtheworld Aroundtheworld is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by cganuelas1995 View Post
Vancouver is getting pretty expensive to live in and people are being pushed out further east, even as Surrey gets expensive too. It will basically make the two regions more connected and livable.
That's a bit of a myth. If you factor in the additional transportation costs of living further out, it often becomes less affordable to live in far-flung areas.
     
     
  #16968  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 4:07 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aroundtheworld View Post
That's a bit of a myth. If you factor in the additional transportation costs of living further out, it often becomes less affordable to live in far-flung areas.
That doesn't seem to stop people from doing it...
     
     
  #16969  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 5:37 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
That doesn't seem to stop people from doing it...
People also spend 60-90 mins longer commuting instead of spending a few dollars on a bridge toll. They aren't all rational.
     
     
  #16970  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 6:48 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
People also spend 60-90 mins longer commuting instead of spending a few dollars on a bridge toll. They aren't all rational.
I agree, although some of those people may well have more time they can afford to spend than money.
     
     
  #16971  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 6:51 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
I agree, although some of those people may well have more time they can afford to spend than money.
Ok and let's also consider the additional gas and wear & tear.
     
     
  #16972  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 7:29 PM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 767
Also worth considering that Mission is outside of the MetroVancouver area and doesn't contribute taxes to TransLink. City of Mission is currently paying the cost for their 701 runs.
     
     
  #16973  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 10:06 PM
Bdawe Bdawe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: The West End
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpogue View Post
Also worth considering that Mission is outside of the MetroVancouver area and doesn't contribute taxes to TransLink. City of Mission is currently paying the cost for their 701 runs.
It's unfortunate that there isn't more coordination with fraser valley transit. I wonder if it would be feasible, for instance, to do 66-555 runthroughs or integrated ticketing.

Since compass, they killed WCE-through ticketing
     
     
  #16974  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 10:20 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,299
There's already some bi directional service with the 701 buses. Here's to hoping it can be extended plus weekend service reinstated. There were quiet a number of riders on the weekend Trainbuses boarding or alighting at Mission City.

Why is the station called Mission City? Mission is a District.
     
     
  #16975  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2017, 11:05 PM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKaz View Post
Why is the station called Mission City? Mission is a District.
Probably because it's in the downtownish area of the district.
     
     
  #16976  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2017, 1:43 AM
Trainguy Trainguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 689
Urban sprawl has an underlying element.. greed! People want it all and in exchange double or triple their commute time in each direction. What happened to living and working in your community?
     
     
  #16977  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2017, 1:56 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainguy View Post
What happened to living and working in your community?
lack of real paying jobs in CoV and lack of affordable housing. due to government inaction on both encouraging business growth and discouraging foreign investment.
     
     
  #16978  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2017, 2:36 AM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
lack of real paying jobs in CoV and lack of affordable housing. due to government inaction on both encouraging business growth and discouraging foreign investment.
...and (silly me) to think that the local economy was "booming" via BUSINESS GROWTH (even in terms of optics) as a partial function of foreign investment (weather from American tech firms here or the economic multiplier effect when foreign real estate spending positively impacts the local construction/housing materiel or input supply chain industries etc.)?

Last edited by Caliplanner1; Jul 15, 2017 at 3:31 AM.
     
     
  #16979  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2017, 4:07 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliplanner1 View Post
...and (silly me) to think that the local economy was "booming" via BUSINESS GROWTH (even in terms of optics) as a partial function of foreign investment (weather from American tech firms here or the economic multiplier effect when foreign real estate spending positively impacts the local construction/housing materiel or input supply chain industries etc.)?
foreign real-estate investment from China hasn't done anything except drive prices up, increase the vacancy rate, and decease the urban canopy ~3% in ~20 years.

yes, sure, construction is great. but no one can afford to buy those places with either acquiring lots of debt, moving from a place they bought many years ago, or rich Chinese people.

tech firms is new and has nothing to do with local politicians. but with the cost of rents going up so much firms are moving to other places and local "mom and pop" shops are closing down. Robsonstrasse is really no more.

so we get a lot of cheaply made, over priced glass boxes, and not enough of them because of government policies. and the demand for them keeps going up due to government lack of policies.

now interest rates are going up at a time when house hold debt is so high due to the housing market being over inflated. that isn't a good recipe for people.
     
     
  #16980  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2017, 4:17 AM
Dave2 Dave2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKaz View Post

Why is the station called Mission City? Mission is a District.
That was the name bestowed on the station by the CPR many many years ago.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:03 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.