HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3641  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2017, 8:22 PM
Chronamut's Avatar
Chronamut Chronamut is offline
Hamilton Historian
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by atnor View Post
Wilson St, between Hughson and John (north side). Stay tuned...
FINALLY!

start tackling those sea of parking lots hamilton!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3642  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2017, 8:27 PM
davidcappi's Avatar
davidcappi davidcappi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,991
That is a YUGE lot. I hope the church survives! They just restored their front door lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3643  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2017, 9:19 PM
Jon Dalton's Avatar
Jon Dalton Jon Dalton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
Yeah I don't really think getting rid of rent control for newly built units was a good idea. Limiting the yearly increases so you can't do something like 20% per year (assuming low inflation) I can see. Just when we were seeing some units built in Hamilton, now who knows what will happen.
When new units are built the owners can charge whatever they like for rent. I don't see how these rules would hurt development but they help thousands of renters who risk losing their homes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3644  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2017, 5:33 PM
NortheastWind NortheastWind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidcappi View Post
That is a YUGE lot. I hope the church survives! They just restored their front door lol
Here's the Google satellite image. I wonder if the entire parking lot is all the same owner.

And there's definitely a need for parking with most spots filled in every lot, so when infill starts to happen a new parking garage somewhere would be prudent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3645  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2017, 6:11 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by NortheastWind View Post
Here's the Google satellite image. I wonder if the entire parking lot is all the same owner.

And there's definitely a need for parking with most spots filled in every lot, so when infill starts to happen a new parking garage somewhere would be prudent.
A garage with ground level retail wouldn't be too bad. There's a few in Ottawa's Byward Market and they blend in half decently. Not as big an investment as a tower with loads of parking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3646  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2017, 6:56 PM
davidcappi's Avatar
davidcappi davidcappi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,991
Quote:
And there's definitely a need for parking with most spots filled in every lot, so when infill starts to happen a new parking garage somewhere would be prudent.
75 Spots in 22 George will be municipal parking spaces. I think it's a total of 2/3 floors? I wouldn't be surprised if this trend of working with developers to include public parking in residential building parking lots continues.

There will always be places to park, but the real question is will Hamilton drivers be willing to accept increases in fares as well as changes to their usual routines? We're a lazy people, and convincing some car owners to walk an extra few blocks or through a different neighborhood is going to be tough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3647  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2017, 1:45 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,404
City will look at scrapping more downtown incentive grants
Should the city rethink whether it needs to spend tax dollars to encourage development?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/downtown-incentive-grants-1.4172235

It's yet another sign that Hamilton is booming. The city is stepping up plans to look at scrapping a program that spurs downtown development, saying it might not be needed anymore.

The city already reviews a program — called the downtown and community renewal improvement plan — every five years, said Jason Farr, Ward 2 councillor.

Now it'll examine it at the three-year mark instead. It'll also examine a comprehensive report of all the city's development incentive programs next year.

Farr isn't sure it's time to scrap the downtown incentives altogether. But it's time to ask the question.

"It's unbelievable," he said of the rate of development in downtown Hamilton.

He has a large drawer in the bottom of his desk reserved for development applications, he said. "That drawer is quickly filling up, and it's a big drawer."

A quick scan around downtown Hamilton backs up the claim. Excavators are tearing down the old Delta Bingo hall at King William and Hughson streets, where LIUNA is building an apartment tower. It's also finished a 21-storey tower in progress near the Lister Block.

Vrancor Group, which is finishing two high-rise residential complexes on Main Street West, plans a 32-storey tower at 20/22 George St. There are also condo projects planned for the former James Street Baptist Church (the 30-storey Connolly building), and Tivoli theatre (a 22-storey tower), among others.

All of this has the city rethinking whether it needs to spend tax dollars to encourage development. Earlier this month, city council's general issues committee voted to phase out a vacant unit rebate program for owners of commercial and industrial properties. Farr's motions about development grants, approved by the same committee Wednesday, is another move down that road.

A community improvement plan lets a municipality funnel funds and initiatives into a specific area. Their goal includes to "target areas in transition or in need of repair, rehabilitation and redevelopment," the city's website says. They also "stimulate private sector investment."

Various programs have stemmed from the downtown plan, including facade improvement and tax increment grants. Farr said they've spurred a lot of development so far, so he's not sure he wants to scrap them.

"I'm going to wait for the review," he said. But "essentially, we're saying let's review it, and let's try to do it sooner rather than later."

Other councillors, such as Sam Merulla of Ward 4, say there's no reason to keep throwing money into incentive grants.

There was a time when developers were doing Hamilton a favour by developing here, he said earlier this month.

"We're beyond that now. Now we're doing them a favour."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3648  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2017, 1:47 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,404
I'd rather see the program shifted to focus on other areas of Hamilton such as the Barton Village, Kenilworth Ave, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3649  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2017, 1:54 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelTown View Post
I'd rather see the program shifted to focus on other areas of Hamilton such as the Barton Village, Kenilworth Ave, etc.
Definitely agree.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3650  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2017, 7:43 PM
thmx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Content removed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3651  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2017, 4:33 PM
LikeHamilton's Avatar
LikeHamilton LikeHamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 2,759
From yesterdays Bay Area Economic Summit.

Norton & McKeown: in both Hamilton and Burlington, there are 1,181,572 square feet office vacancy.

Norton & McKeown: report 1,045 acres shovel ready land and 3,695 acres of vacant employment land in Hamilton and Burlington

Bay Area added more than 725 new or relocated businesses to the area in 2016.

This region is responsible for 20% of Canada's GDP Kathleen Wynne .

Bay Area (Hamilton and Burlington), by the numbers: 413,300 employed, a high job to population ratio.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3652  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2017, 1:23 PM
Chronamut's Avatar
Chronamut Chronamut is offline
Hamilton Historian
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,236
Greensville school, older than Canada, to be torn down after 169 years

School was built in 1848 and will be rebuilt on the same site in time for fall 2018


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/g...o-be-torn-down-after-169-years-1.4170236
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3653  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2017, 6:57 PM
LikeHamilton's Avatar
LikeHamilton LikeHamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 2,759
Form "THE PUBLIC RECORD: by Joey Coleman, July 7, 2017

Development Application Filed for Surface Parking Lot at 191 King Street West (Corner of Bay and King.)

Exactly three years ago today, I reported on City staff moving to protect surfacing parking in the Central Business District by locking up a new parking lease to prevent the development of 191 King Street West on the south west corner of Bay Street.

I can now report that a development application has been filed with the City of Hamilton to develop the property, and that application was considered by the City’s Design Review Panel on June 8, 2017.


Due to an administrative oversight, the City did not provide public notice of the June 8th meeting. The Public Record filed a formal protest with the City’s General Manager of Planning and Economic Development, and requested copies of all documents from the meeting. I’m satisified that error was not in bad faith, and other than filing the protest, will be taking no further action.

The Public Record emailed General Manager of Planning and Economic Development Jason Thorne to ask if there has been a reversal of his department’s position that City Hall needs to protect surface parking.

We spoke by phone today.

“Staff will judge the application on its merits,” Thorne says. In terms of parking, Thorne says it is the City’s responsibility to address parking demands in the Downtown, and the loss of surface parking will not weight into the staff decision on the development application.

Thorne says the City will look at longer term solutions to managing Downtown Hamilton’s parking

The Public Record is awaiting a response on the request for documents, and will review the planning application in the coming weeks. Once this happens, we’ll post details of the application.

The full article:

https://www.thepublicrecord.ca/2017/07/d...ace-parking-lot-at-191-king-street-west/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3654  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2017, 7:44 PM
Chronamut's Avatar
Chronamut Chronamut is offline
Hamilton Historian
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,236
Most of the parking lots I see downtown are largely empty, esp. the ones by hughson st.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3655  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2017, 7:59 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,859
Somebody needs to give Thorne a copy of the The High Cost of Free Parking
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3656  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2017, 1:05 AM
NortheastWind NortheastWind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronamut View Post
Most of the parking lots I see downtown are largely empty, esp. the ones by hughson st.
But during big events like concerts, when there's an influx of people from outside the city, there is hardly a spot to find.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3657  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2017, 4:24 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by NortheastWind View Post
But during big events like concerts, when there's an influx of people from outside the city, there is hardly a spot to find.
Do we plan for "big events" or day-to-day living downtown? We are at the point of finally having that choice. And I think the correct one is clearly the latter.

Hope we get to see some details of this King/Bay proposal soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3658  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2017, 6:02 PM
NortheastWind NortheastWind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
Do we plan for "big events" or day-to-day living downtown? We are at the point of finally having that choice. And I think the correct one is clearly the latter.

Hope we get to see some details of this King/Bay proposal soon.
Plan for both because big name acts at First Ontario Centre and Hamilton Place are not going away. People come from all over to see the entertainment. Super crawl too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3659  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2017, 6:24 PM
Chronamut's Avatar
Chronamut Chronamut is offline
Hamilton Historian
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by NortheastWind View Post
Plan for both because big name acts at First Ontario Centre and Hamilton Place are not going away. People come from all over to see the entertainment. Super crawl too.
do what they did in the past - reserve a few spots for multi-story parking garages, and develop the rest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3660  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2017, 6:29 PM
Chronamut's Avatar
Chronamut Chronamut is offline
Hamilton Historian
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,236
downtown city of hamilton secondary plan - mentions heights, sun/shade requirements, heritage considerations etc - a good knowledge base to have.

https://d3fpllf1m7bbt3.cloudfront.net/si...-hamilton-tall-buildings-study-draft.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:38 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.