HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2481  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 5:54 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Day said capacity at the frequently-congested tunnel could be improved by banning trucks during rush hour and running local ports 24 hours a day.
Correct me if I'm wrong but our container ports are already 24/7? Haven't been to Deltaport but the other ones sure are.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2482  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 3:27 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
This is why when it comes to infrastructure th Liberals are far better than the NDP.

True leadership builds what is needed and does not pander to the city councils.

I do not need to remind people what our Skytrain system would look like today if that same approach had been taken for rapid transit expansions.
Umm... the mayors actually did all come together with a coherent transit plan for the Lower Mainland and the Province blocked their attempts to fund it. The reason the Liberals got a drubbing in the election is exactly because they didn't care about these kinds of issues.

Quote:
I laughed out loud when one of the councilors said they should simply just ban trucks from the crossing during rush hour and run the ports 24/7 to make up for it... like fucking serisously?
Why exactly is that a bad idea? All the other west coast ports run 24/7 - why does Deltaport get to concentrate all it's traffic into the daytime hours?

Sure, it's not going to fix everything - but it's cheap and it makes sense, IMHO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2483  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 4:49 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong but our container ports are already 24/7? Haven't been to Deltaport but the other ones sure are.
Deltaport, Vanterm, and Centerm are open between 8am and midnight. Fraser Surrey Docks is open between 8am and 4pm.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2484  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 5:00 PM
moosejaw moosejaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
when one of the councilors said they should simply just ban trucks from the crossing during rush hour and run the ports 24/7 to make up for it... like fucking serisously?.
Let's get all the container ship traffic to accommodate this minor request!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2485  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 5:32 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
Deltaport, Vanterm, and Centerm are open between 8am and midnight. Fraser Surrey Docks is open between 8am and 4pm.
Seriously? I had assumed a major port like Vancouver would run 24/7. I don't know how other ports around the world operate so maybe this is normal. If not then it's time to get with the program.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2486  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 6:24 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
Deltaport, Vanterm, and Centerm are open between 8am and midnight. Fraser Surrey Docks is open between 8am and 4pm.
OK, I guess "open" means accepting new trucks rather than buzzing with activity because people are definitely working there all night/morning. I was at Centerm after hours for almost a year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2487  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 7:08 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
OK, I guess "open" means accepting new trucks rather than buzzing with activity because people are definitely working there all night/morning. I was at Centerm after hours for almost a year.
Yeah, that's what people mean by "open" because they'd rather shift the container truck traffic to off-peak hours, which for the Massey Tunnel is pretty much after 8pm and before 6am because it's jammed pretty much during daylight hours. People don't really care that the various ports are operating 24/7, just that trucks can deliver containers to and retrieve containers from the port 24/7.

How much in the way of hazardous goods gets diverted over the AFB because they're not allowed through the GMT?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2488  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 9:37 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,149
Quote:
"Day said capacity at the frequently-congested tunnel could be improved by banning trucks during rush hour"
Here we go.

NDP hasn't even been sworn in and the drive to stifle business growth has begun.

Maybe capacity could be increased by building a bridge and not nixing tolls for no reason other than vote pandering... I wonder if anyone thought of that option?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2489  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 9:47 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
Umm... the mayors actually did all come together with a coherent transit plan for the Lower Mainland and the Province blocked their attempts to fund it. The reason the Liberals got a drubbing in the election is exactly because they didn't care about these kinds of issues.


Why exactly is that a bad idea? All the other west coast ports run 24/7 - why does Deltaport get to concentrate all it's traffic into the daytime hours?

Sure, it's not going to fix everything - but it's cheap and it makes sense, IMHO.
umm, news flash, but Burnaby and Port Moody wanted the Evergreen Line to be at grade LRT (especially Port Moody).

It was actually your horrid Liberlas that strong-armed them into skytrain technology

Same with the Canada Line, Richmond wanted at grade LRT too.

And at more than one interview the Liberals did hint that they were going to do the same for the extension to Langley when the time came.

And yeah, instead of building acceptable infrastructure lets just make an entire industry and all of its spin off industries operate during the night.

While we are at it, instead of building the Broadway Subway who don't we make UBC hold half of its classes or more throughout the night as well? You know, doesn't fix everything but its cheap and makes sense IMO
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2490  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 11:05 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Here we go.

NDP hasn't even been sworn in and the drive to stifle business growth has begun.
Is he wrong though? The only counter-argument I've seen to his statement have been ad hominem attacks against the NDP.

Trucks make up 8% of the volume through the GMT, and there have been studies in other jurisdictions that show that shifting even 5% of the traffic volume to off-peak times drastically improves the congestion. Taking trucks out of the rush hour could help the GMT a bunch here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2491  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 11:11 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
Is he wrong though? The only counter-argument I've seen to his statement have been ad hominem attacks against the NDP.

Trucks make up 8% of the volume through the GMT, and there have been studies in other jurisdictions that show that shifting even 5% of the traffic volume to off-peak times drastically improves the congestion. Taking trucks out of the rush hour could help the GMT a bunch here.
It's all about priorities.

If you value the impact of the port and their contribution to the well-being of local citizens then you probably wouldn't tell them how to run their business and make it difficult for them.

If you value the commuters in their cars traveling from south of the Fraser to north of the Fraser more that the impact of the port then you don't expand the infrastructure and you put pressure on the port to change their operations.

The Liberals clearly valued the port and its economic impact. The GReenDP would rather cancel the bridge and tell the port how to run its operations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2492  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2017, 11:13 PM
Trainguy Trainguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 689
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
Is he wrong though? The only counter-argument I've seen to his statement have been ad hominem attacks against the NDP.

Trucks make up 8% of the volume through the GMT, and there have been studies in other jurisdictions that show that shifting even 5% of the traffic volume to off-peak times drastically improves the congestion. Taking trucks out of the rush hour could help the GMT a bunch here.
While they are at it, they can also ban trucks from the Pattullo Bridge during morning and evening rush hours as well. Many take up 2 lanes to navigate the bridge safely.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2493  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2017, 12:13 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
If you value the impact of the port and their contribution to the well-being of local citizens then you probably wouldn't tell them how to run their business and make it difficult for them.
And yet somehow other west coast ports run 24x7 operations and make good money doing it...

It would be interesting to get a trucker's point of view on this. Would they rather be stuck in traffic during the day or would they rather be making early morning or late evening runs when they could just sail through the tunnel?

I was fortunate to have flex working hours at my job, and I chose to work from 6:00AM to 2:00PM specifically because commuting was so much more pleasant at those hours, even though I was using transit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2494  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2017, 3:53 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
I wonder if it would be possible to pressure them into the building the bridge, even if at only 8 lanes. I wonder where overall public opinion is. It'll get built eventually. Why not now, when it's already needed?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2495  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2017, 4:19 AM
Stingray2004's Avatar
Stingray2004 Stingray2004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: White Rock, BC (Metro Vancouver)
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
And yet somehow other west coast ports run 24x7 operations and make good money doing it...
And yet Westshore Terminals (operator of Roberts Bank Superport):

Quote:
The terminal has about 200 full-time employees and runs 24 hours a day, most days of the year.
http://www.bcmarineterminals.com/Westshore_Terminals.aspx

Truckers also want to live their daily lives like everyone else - not on the night shift. Furthermore, when they deliver their containers to local distribution centres, who knows how many are closed on the night shift?

In that vein, I wonder when these signs, posted along the Hwy 99 corridor for a few years, will finally come down?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2496  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2017, 4:42 AM
Stingray2004's Avatar
Stingray2004 Stingray2004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: White Rock, BC (Metro Vancouver)
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post

While we are at it, instead of building the Broadway Subway who don't we make UBC hold half of its classes or more throughout the night as well? You know, doesn't fix everything but its cheap and makes sense IMO
Yep. That's some of the same logic going on in this thread. Ergo, by definition/extension, obvious same logic holds for proposed Broadway Subway line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2497  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2017, 5:05 AM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stingray2004 View Post
In that vein, I wonder when these signs, posted along the Hwy 99 corridor for a few years, will finally come down?

Technically construction has started so the new government could leave them up until the liberals are elected in an election or two.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2498  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2017, 5:42 AM
Bobert Bobert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 249
Why would you ban trucks at rush hour when there are thousands of warehouses/distributors who rely on those shipments...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2499  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2017, 5:54 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
Is he wrong though? The only counter-argument I've seen to his statement have been ad hominem attacks against the NDP.

Trucks make up 8% of the volume through the GMT, and there have been studies in other jurisdictions that show that shifting even 5% of the traffic volume to off-peak times drastically improves the congestion. Taking trucks out of the rush hour could help the GMT a bunch here.
Have you driven through the GMT north during rush hour? You can ban all the trucks you want you're still going to have crazy backups. You got 3 lanes on 99 north. 2 lanes from the 17 on ramp to 99. 2 lanes from 17 A on ramp to 99. Plus another 2 lanes on ramp to 99 from River Road. That's essentially 9 lanes of traffic trying to squeeze into 1 measly northbound lane. Even without the southbound counterflow that's still essentially 9 lanes trying to squeeze into 2 lanes. You would still have backups even without the trucks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2500  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2017, 5:57 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobert View Post
Why would you ban trucks at rush hour when there are thousands of warehouses/distributors who rely on those shipments...
Because these politicians live in a bubble and they're entitled to an opinion just like everyone else. I wonder if trucks are banned in any of the numerous tunnels in Europe or the New York area tunnels?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:01 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.