Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper
You're flipping flopping all over the place. A rendering is not the same as an approved design. It's just an "artist impression". That's no contractual obligation to delivery what is rendered. Site plan applications deals with how the design conforms to approved zoning. I don't think a superficial design change that doesn't affect density, the height envelope, servicing, etc. matters too much to the overworked staff.
HOAs are private associations usually registered as not for profits. It's not comparable. The less government oversight, the more outlandish and autocratic they become. It's a contradictions south of the border. The places that want less government are popular places for these extreme HOAs
|
I didn't flip-flop. I asked two questions. It appears that you don't know the answer to my question about whether the city can take action following a bait and switch on an approved design; your point about whether city staff would care in an overworked state of mind is not what was asked. so I'll just leave it at that.
Threaded Mode