HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3921  
Old Posted May 25, 2017, 5:06 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Completely agree on great execution with Peninsula. Looks like a high-quality landmark for the area.
Queensborough is really shaping up with lots of attractive developments. Too bad they can't make a pedestrian bridge to the Quay feasible. You could walk from the train station to Queensborough in probably 10-15mins if it were to ever happen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3922  
Old Posted May 25, 2017, 9:30 AM
Marshal Marshal is offline
perhaps . . .
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by retro_orange View Post
Queensborough is really shaping up with lots of attractive developments. Too bad they can't make a pedestrian bridge to the Quay feasible. You could walk from the train station to Queensborough in probably 10-15mins if it were to ever happen.
What are the other attractive developments?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3923  
Old Posted May 25, 2017, 8:24 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,044
lots of townhouses and low rises near the new tower







__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3924  
Old Posted May 31, 2017, 8:18 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,645
Elliot St. Condos
GBL twitter May 26th:
The red/salmon strip clashes in my opinion.


https://twitter.com/GBLArchitects
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3925  
Old Posted May 31, 2017, 8:50 PM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Elliot St. Condos
GBL twitter May 26th:
The red/salmon strip clashes in my opinion.


https://twitter.com/GBLArchitects
It's a trick of the light, it definitely looks like a darker red in person. I also have a friend who has been waiting forever for this building to get completed. Though he bought like 3 years ago now, the price for the unit was a steal in comparison to what is marketed in New Westminster now, not to mention Burnaby.

I like all the colours (although I wish the blue wasn't spandrel) it is kitty corner to a new elementary school so i think it fits perfectly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3926  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 1:43 AM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
The townhomes are handled well here - a nice change from the usual beige concrete and glass. Nice staggering as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3927  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 6:08 AM
urbancanadian urbancanadian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 713
To add to the Queensborough discussion above, here's an aerial of the area I took while flying in to YVR. Sorry if it's too big - I'm posting the second largest size so you can make out everything from far away (also it's blurry). Bonus skylines visible are Downtown New West, Uptown New West, Lougheed/Burquitlam, Burnaby Mountain, and Coquitlam (far).

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3928  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 6:13 AM
urbancanadian urbancanadian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 713
Here's an aerial of the Parc Riviera development progressing along Richmond's north arm riverfront:



And this one's a little random for anyone interested. Progress on Oxford's industrial development in Burnaby's Big Bend area.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3929  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 10:16 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbancanadian View Post
...

And this one's a little random for anyone interested. Progress on Oxford's industrial development in Burnaby's Big Bend area.

Thanks!

That's the Burnaby Incinerator in the middle of the pic.
I guess the Oxford property is the former Norampac recycling plant / newsprint mill?

GVRD/Metro Vancouver previously sold steam from the incinerator to the mill until the mill was shut down.
There should be an opportunity for Oxford's industrial buildings to be heated by steam from the incinerator.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3930  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2017, 9:58 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,645
618 Carnarvon, New Westminster

Quote:
The planned project includes a 33-storey condo tower, including:
◾253 units;
◾28 studios, 69 one-bedrooms, 126 two-bedrooms & 39 three-bedrooms;
◾a total building height of 350 ft.;
◾a total density of 6.20 FSR;
◾retail uses fronting Sixth Street;
◾325 underground parking spaces.
◾A ‘pocket park’ fronting onto Sixth and Carnarvon.
◾A CAC of $2,900,000

http://www.vancouvermarket.ca/2017/06/14/33-storey-tower-proposed-for-downtown-new-west-site/


http://www.vancouvermarket.ca/2017/06/14/33-storey-tower-proposed-for-downtown-new-west-site/


http://www.vancouvermarket.ca/2017/06/14/33-storey-tower-proposed-for-downtown-new-west-site/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3931  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2017, 5:03 PM
VarBreStr18 VarBreStr18 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 750
A lot more sensible location than that Quayside one. Have the river view just the same, without the hassles of the train. Close enough to walk along river. No I don't know any of the developers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3932  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2017, 8:53 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,044
is this new?

https://www.onni.com/thegrande/

the grande sutter brook village in port moody

__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3933  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2017, 3:41 PM
VanK VanK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
is this new?

https://www.onni.com/thegrande/

the grande sutter brook village in port moody
Yes i think this is their final tower at Suter Brook.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3934  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2017, 4:06 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3935  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2017, 7:23 AM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
Moody Centre to become an urban centre

http://www.tricitynews.com/news/moody-centre-to-become-an-urban-centre-1.20688814

Quote:
...
Instead, councillors endorsed a plan last week to cap future development in the 20-acre neighbourhood that runs from the Evergreen Extension tracks to St. Johns Street, and between Moody and Spring streets, to 26 storeys as part of a mix of residential and commercial buildings.
...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3936  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2017, 12:26 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,645
That's still impressive for Port Moody!

Quote:
...
“We’re not Burquitlam, we’re not Metrotown, we’re not Brentwood,” said Coun. Barbara Junker, referring to other town centre areas around SkyTrain stations in Burnaby and Coquitlam that are burgeoning with new highrise condo towers. “We don’t want to be Brentwood.”

In his presentation to council about the proposed transit-oriented development plan, Port Moody’s senior planner, Alex Taylor, said the area’s current zoning — which allows for the construction of residential development as high as 12 storeys — isn’t economically attractive to developers and wouldn’t create the kind of density to lure commercial development such as grocery stores. As a result, there hasn’t been any redevelopment in the area since 2014. Currently it’s comprised mostly of commercial shops and light industrial spaces.

Taylor said the construction of higher towers in the area’s core and smaller six-storey residential buildings at the edges would present an opportunity for the city to leverage that new development to create more park space, a promenade along Spring Street, pedestrian walkways and plazas as well as the new pedestrian bridge.
...
http://www.tricitynews.com/news/moody-centre-to-become-an-urban-centre-1.20688814
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3937  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2017, 7:45 PM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
An improvement from the old plan, but capping everything at 26 storeys looks ridiculous and actually kinda depressing. Hello, monotony!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3938  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2017, 9:11 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,736
Alex Taylor, said the area’s current zoning — which allows for the construction of residential development as high as 12 storeys — isn’t economically attractive to developers and wouldn’t create the kind of density to lure commercial development such as grocery stores. As a result, there hasn’t been any redevelopment in the area since 2014. Currently it’s comprised mostly of commercial shops and light industrial spaces.


I think Vancouver and those who think that "12 stories can create the same kind of densities as 40-storey buildings" should see this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3939  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2017, 9:17 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbancanadian View Post
Here's an aerial of the Parc Riviera development progressing along Richmond's north arm riverfront:


..
I drove by that Parc Riviera site a couple weeks ago, has to be the most godforsaken place for a residential multifamily development ever. What was Richmond council thinking?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3940  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2017, 1:07 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
I drove by that Parc Riviera site a couple weeks ago, has to be the most godforsaken place for a residential multifamily development ever. What was Richmond council thinking?
why is that? cant say i head out that way. I'm genuinely curious. it seems decently close to transit. plus, council only approved what a developer decided was a good place to build. more tax dollars and former mostly useless land.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.