HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2741  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 1:42 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,888
Today

__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2742  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 2:40 PM
h0twired's Avatar
h0twired h0twired is offline
Dynamic Positivity!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
Today
You misspelled "Tuesday".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2743  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 2:49 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,272
I don't like this.. City going to get screwed again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2744  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 3:41 PM
lilwayne lilwayne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 757
lots of stipulations in place if st regis gets demolished

I think there are deadlines and other stipulations involved that protect this property from becoming another capital pointe.. if nothing gets developed the rights to property go back to centerventure and also sky city is no longer elgible for the tax rebate/grant they were promised.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2745  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 3:44 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,272
I just don't want the City to let them demo the building, regardless of condition or use, and leave us with a shiny new gravel lot. Or even worse, a hole in the ground like CP.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2746  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 3:45 PM
The Unknown Poster The Unknown Poster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,024
Im in a business that does business there and we were called to remove services for impending closure & demo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2747  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 3:51 PM
lilwayne lilwayne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 757
construction funding has to be in place before demo apparently.. expect some news from Edenshaw/fortress soon.. I hope Edenshaw has enough integrity to see this through their name s now tied with this project..

Edenshaw has built a few high rises so they are legit

remember Edenshaw is not building capital pointe..

i just need to remind people again this is joint project not just fortresss... so this can still happen regardless what happens in regina

http://www.edenshaw.com/

skycity project is on thier website as one of thier main projects
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2748  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 3:58 PM
lilwayne lilwayne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 757
just one more reminder for all you people going winnipeger right now


this is a edenshaw project not just fortress

edenshaw has developed a few 45 plus story projects they are legit... dont go panic and cry and think omg look what happen in vagina no this is edenshaw project... fortress is a partner but edenshaw is just as deep into this
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2749  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 3:59 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
I just don't want the City to let them demo the building, regardless of condition or use, and leave us with a shiny new gravel lot. Or even worse, a hole in the ground like CP.
This is my bottom line. I'm not thrilled about it, but I can live with seeing the St. Regis get demolished, as long as something (anything, even a parkade) gets built on that site. Worst case scenario is demolition followed by surface parking or, as you point out, a big ugly pit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2750  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 4:04 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,272
lil wayne. I'm going all Winnipeger again because that's what we'll be left with. Another surface lot downtown. Edenshaw has nothing to do with the St Regis site. From what I can tell its still separate from SkyCity. Fortress said it will all be rolled into one. But we haven't heard a peep out of Fortress for some time.

To reiterate, we all want to see this development to go ahead. Trusting the City has this under control and we just don't know. But the optics are bad right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2751  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2017, 4:07 PM
lilwayne lilwayne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 757
they lose 4 million if st regis site is not developed.. I'm pretty sure center venture could find some one else willing to develop on it still a pretty decent location.. especially when 300 main is completed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2752  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2017, 2:51 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 15,010
i am also very afraid of this...i don't get the game plan...i know how they make their money on the tower...i don't get what interest they have building parkades in remote cities like Winnipeg...its totally out of their wheelhouse....it seems unlikely the tower will be built, so their portfolio in winnipeg is a parkade?....makes no sense.

even with proof of financing, they can still just demo and bail...i hope they aren't using it to look like they are committed to the tower to get more people to give them their money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2753  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2017, 2:57 AM
lilwayne lilwayne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
i am also very afraid of this...i don't get the game plan...i know how they make their money on the tower...i don't get what interest they have building parkades in remote cities like Winnipeg...its totally out of their wheelhouse....it seems unlikely the tower will be built, so their portfolio in winnipeg is a parkade?....makes no sense.

even with proof of financing, they can still just demo and bail...i hope they aren't using it to look like they are committed to the tower to get more people to give them their money.

I guess in the next month or 2 well know if this is a big con job or not...

all I know is I'm glad I didn't invest in this tower. cuz best case it probably wont be completed til 2020 atleast
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2754  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2017, 4:33 AM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
i am also very afraid of this...i don't get the game plan...i know how they make their money on the tower...i don't get what interest they have building parkades in remote cities like Winnipeg...its totally out of their wheelhouse....it seems unlikely the tower will be built, so their portfolio in winnipeg is a parkade?....makes no sense.

even with proof of financing, they can still just demo and bail...i hope they aren't using it to look like they are committed to the tower to get more people to give them their money.
This is how fucked up Winnipeg is. Someone from Centreventure not understanding why or how a crooked orginization is skirting downtown demolition rules. Holy shit.

Fortress: We are going to demolish the St. Regis.
Centreventure: Do you have a development plan in place and financing to back it?
Fortress: yeaaahh wee doo. I think so.

St. Regis is demolished.

Centreventure: When will the development begin?
Fortress: We will let you know after, uh, after we get permits, when uh, after, uh Capital Pointe is finished.

SURPRISE! Discount parking here!
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2755  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2017, 4:53 AM
lilwayne lilwayne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 757
clearly they would have to prove they have tenants and construction financing in place

truviking must not be that involved with centerventure
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2756  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2017, 5:08 AM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilwayne View Post

truviking must not be that involved with centerventure
Ya think?

http://www.centreventure.com/about.html
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2757  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2017, 5:23 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Now that's funny.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2758  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2017, 2:54 PM
Cam Cam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Wpg
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Only The Lonely.. View Post
Bring back diagonal parking downtown. Bam! No more need for dead space surface parking lots and parkades in downtown Winnipeg that ruin the pedestrian streetscape.
Even better, if the area between the cars and the curb is a protected bike lane.
This is a great idea. The diagonal parking will improve safety for cyclists because the parked car doors won't open into the bike lane.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2759  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2017, 3:05 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Hey Viking, hope you're wearing a cup!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2760  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2017, 12:13 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 15,010
They must show proof of financing before they are allowed to demolish. There are as many checks on them as possible. That doesn't mean they can't bail. There are penalties to doing that but there is no way to absolutely guarantee it.

I'm not saying they will bail. I just don't understand their interest in a project like this. If the tower was half way up I wouldn't be fearful but without the big project it seems weird they would want to do the little one.

Maybe it's a good sign. Maybe it means they are confident that the big project will happen.

Fingers crossed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:56 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.