Quote:
Originally Posted by 240glt
They never should have tried to save the structure
That right there guaranteed you'd never get a decent contemporary facility
|
i'm not sure i would agree that they never should have tried to save the structure. from my perspective it would be more like "they never should have tried to incorporate the structure into something totally inappropriate and unsuited to the existing structure".
i think the existing structure would have been quite able to have been incorporated into a decent contemporary facility. the problem was moving the design past what should have been a handsome, striking contemporary facility to something iconic and completely unsuited to the existing structure
the fault lays not in saving the structure but in pursuing an iconic imagery that places too much value on imagery without understanding it and with a complete misunderstanding of the surrounding urban context.
now the problem will be compounded in that iconic is "all or nothing". you can't be "half iconic" because all you do is reinforce the fact you don't understand iconic and/or that you couldn't/refused to pay for iconic.