HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2241  
Old Posted May 5, 2017, 8:44 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,543
https://www.biv.com/article/2017/5/ndp-says-massey-bridge-cost-12-billion/

Quote:
Documents leaked to the NDP suggest the debt servicing costs on the $3.5 billion George Massey Tunnel replacement bridge total $8 billion
Explanation:

Quote:
"As an example, if you bought a home for $750,000 today and pay it off over a 35- year period, you'll pay nearly $1 million in interest. You wouldn’t say you paid $1.75 million for the home. It’s the exactly the same principle for the Massey Bridge – and the reason we're doing it is to keep toll rates low for commuters.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2242  
Old Posted May 11, 2017, 12:30 AM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,759
Looks like commanding views one would get when heading over the bridge, where the deck is 58 meters above the river (although it is proposed to be increased to 65 meters to allow bigger ships to pass under to Fraser Docks).
It would be quite the grand entrance to Metro Vancouver. However, you wouldn't see downtown Vancouver - just the top of Shangri La if one is looking for it.


North Approach at top of deck.


Looking Northeast.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2243  
Old Posted May 11, 2017, 1:06 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cypherus View Post
Looks like commanding views one would get when heading over the bridge, where the deck is 58 meters above the river (although it is proposed to be increased to 65 meters to allow bigger ships to pass under to Fraser Docks).
not happening, they said it wouldn't and will not happen. 58m is the final.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2244  
Old Posted May 11, 2017, 5:21 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cypherus View Post
Looks like commanding views one would get when heading over the bridge, where the deck is 58 meters above the river (although it is proposed to be increased to 65 meters to allow bigger ships to pass under to Fraser Docks).
It would be quite the grand entrance to Metro Vancouver. However, you wouldn't see downtown Vancouver - just the top of Shangri La if one is looking for it.


North Approach at top of deck.


Looking Northeast.
The top pic shows how a lot of our major roads are totally outdated. The tunnel roadbed looks like a country 2 lane road. Bring on this modern bridge with a modern roadway on it finally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2245  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 2:41 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,307
When does the contract get awarded?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2246  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 2:59 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,905
Looks like never if the Liberals don't somehow luck out with a majority.

This is why I wish BC had a left of centre political party more similar to those in Ontario and Quebec. They are for the environment and focus major funds for transit, but they don't forsake highways and roads in the process of doing so.

Please note I would be happy with a compromise, such as reducing the bridge itself to 8 lanes and maybe extending the HOV / Bus lanes to at least King George to have a proper rapid bus transfer station for White Rock, but i worry it will be a complete cancellation.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2247  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 3:14 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,307
There is definitely activity along the 99 corridor in Richmond but it seems very half assed. Some sand here, some piles of dirt there. Even though the contract for site prep has been awarded could they be waiting to find out who will lead the province before really ramping up? Hmmmm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2248  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 3:27 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,905
Exactly, everything is in limbo currently.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2249  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 4:51 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 887
Oh lord, might as well take those signs down that say construction starts in 2017.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2250  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 5:49 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,307
Sources are saying that even WITH a majority (44 seats) getting this project built will be a struggle. I hate to say it but I think this project is dead in the water. The Liberals needed to win decisively in order to get this bridge built
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2251  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 6:16 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
Sources are saying that even WITH a majority (44 seats) getting this project built will be a struggle. I hate to say it but I think this project is dead in the water. The Liberals needed to win decisively in order to get this bridge built
Sweet deal. Now the money can be spent on more appropriate projects.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2252  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 6:33 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,905
That is not exactly how it works, it is not as if there is a big pile of money sitting around they can just use on anything.

The BC Libs promised the same amount as the NDP for the Broadway subway and Surrey"s pet LRT project, so those were going to get built anyway (which for major transit projects would have taken us to the next election cycle anyways), but now without any major needed road improvements it seems.

The idea that the Liberals did not build transit is a little misleading, yes they always seem to do it in an annoying somewhat hesitant fashion (which I agree is a detriment) but during their majority governments we did get the Canada Line, the Evergreen Line, many station upgrades, the #1 rapid bus, etc... while also improving our outdated and inadequate highway system to more modern standards and closer to an appropriate size for our region.

The 99 and the GMT needs to be updated / replaced, and that will involve major interchanges and a mega structure.

As I said, I can understand small compromises (such as reducing the bridge to 8 lanes) but to outright cancel the project will be a huge mistake.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2253  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 3:26 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,543
I believe the NDP said they were in favour of a twinned tunnel instead. I'm not sure what the official Green position was.

Safe to say it's back to the drawing board.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2254  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 3:55 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
I believe the NDP said they were in favour of a twinned tunnel instead. I'm not sure what the official Green position was.

Safe to say it's back to the drawing board.
From the Green Party page on transportation:

Quote:
A B.C. Green Government would suspend work on the Massey Tunnel replacement pending a comprehensive and transparent review of alternatives, in cooperation with the Mayors’ Council.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2255  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 3:58 PM
M00dy M00dy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
I believe the NDP said they were in favour of a twinned tunnel instead. I'm not sure what the official Green position was.

Safe to say it's back to the drawing board.
A twinned tunnel should not, and imo will not be built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2256  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 4:01 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by M00dy View Post
A twinned tunnel should not, and imo will not be built.
Why not?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2257  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 6:11 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
You could not just twin the tunnel, as you would need to build 2 new tunnels. The existing one would need to be removed as it interferes in the shipping channel with larger vessels. The Federal money on the table for the project is on the condition of opening up that shipping channel.
I'm not so sure we'll see this one nixed quite yet, lets wait until the dust settles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2258  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 6:45 PM
Trainguy Trainguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 689
This bridge project is not about transportation issues. It is about politics. A project that hangs on the threads of an election is not important enough to be built or it would get built regardless of who is in power. We will have a good idea of where things are headed after the 26th.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2259  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 7:01 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainguy View Post
This bridge project is not about transportation issues.
It's pretty obvious you've never tried to use the tunnel when traffic is moderate to high. At one point I considered moving to White Rock, but the tunnel was a deal breaker, and I'm used to traffic bottlenecks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2260  
Old Posted May 17, 2017, 7:32 PM
Trainguy Trainguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
It's pretty obvious you've never tried to use the tunnel when traffic is moderate to high. At one point I considered moving to White Rock, but the tunnel was a deal breaker, and I'm used to traffic bottlenecks.
I hear yah.. My point was that there are no meetings of the mind politically or it would get built regardless. That's what makes it political. To the average commuter stuck in traffic, of course it is necessary. What a waste of time sitting in traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:49 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.