Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
You've just put your finger on one of the biggest problems with how we build our cities.
|
To say nothing of that fact that Canadian Tire
just successfully had every single one of their properties in Ontario devalued by MPAC because "the resale value of a big box store is very low in the current market". Thunder Bay alone has to pay back over $1,000,000 to the company's three properties on Thunder Bay, one of which (the one I posted photos of) has been vacant for over 15 years.
I've been suggesting to city councillors and city planners here (as I am now in a capacity to actually interact with them on occasion) that we should ban the new construction of retail-purpose buildings over 50,000sqft in an effort to undo this problem. By limiting the supply of big box stores, we can bring the value of Canadian Tire's assets back up, which I'm sure would really, really help that company.

Instead of building a new 50,000sqft store, let's re-purpose an existing empty one, which we have. I posted a picture of it on the previous page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
BTW, having these types of areas look grungy isn't just a Toronto thing. You see it in most Canadian cities.
|
I think it was just the fact that it was
so run down. Like, major-image-route-bridge-that-hasn't-been-painted-in-50-years run down. The kind of thing that literally doesn't exist in Thunder Bay anymore, our oldest bridge is 110 years old and immaculately maintained; our second oldest bridge is 40, or so? But we're 1% of what Toronto is at best. That things were run down made sense to me, I'm not saying it was illogical, I'm just saying that I wasn't expecting it to be so obvious and in such visible locations. Even my city has the decency to cover up its shameful bits. Our architecture might be out of the 1980s but at least it's not falling apart and covered in rust.
Also keep in mind that until that point, the oldest city I had ever been to
was Thunder Bay.