HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1401  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2017, 3:21 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 18,000
There are so many office proposals currently that it is difficult to remember them all.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1402  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2017, 3:27 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Yes completely new, obviously there have been previous rumblings about the site in the past, but this will be a new unheard of proposal for that location. That is all for now, so no point asking.

And no it will not make the height obsessed happy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1403  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2017, 3:41 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,724
Thanks.

My guess would be the Austeville site on West Georgia (Budget Rent-a-Car), only because it's a relatively empty site that hasn't had a concrete proposal/design issued for it, and it would have the same view cone over it as Telus Garden.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1404  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2017, 3:56 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,551
Oh Geez

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Yes completely new, obviously there have been previous rumblings about the site in the past, but this will be a new unheard of proposal for that location. That is all for now, so no point asking.

And no it will not make the height obsessed happy.
Oh deary me, I'm quite certain the site your talking about is in my list of 3. I'm curious which one of us will be able to spill first, assuming someone else doesn't first that is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1405  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2017, 4:13 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
I'm fairly confident I know all 3 of the ones you have hinted at and I'm not at all concerned about being first, have at it. I won't release an real details until the documents are public.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1406  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2017, 4:14 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
hmm i bet the height will go up to the view cone. tell me im wrong! haha. who knows, maybe some people who say the market dictates the height are right and it wont maximize it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1407  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2017, 5:03 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
I'm fairly confident I know all 3 of the ones you have hinted at and I'm not at all concerned about being first, have at it. I won't release an real details until the documents are public.
Oh, I'm not concerned with being first, it's more that they go public as early as possible. I obviously will be waiting until I get clearance as well. After all, there's only so many people that go to open houses and take photos of the models. At this point I think there's more than a few people in the city staff / development community that know who are behind these feathers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1408  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 5:59 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
I'll add some fuel to the thread as well, but can't give out details for reasons just discussed. There will be another office proposal coming to light very shortly which is expected to proceed at a very rapid pace.
I've hear this one will feature a bit of steel as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1409  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 6:34 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,699
OD - let's just say you're good at speculating...

Hmmm, maybe the proposal in question will be an interesting one when it is finally delivered to the public in a nice little package. The developer shouldn't have to look too far for a tenant...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1410  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 7:22 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,516
Sounds like several members here are in the know.

I just wish that it wasn't a certain Vision-wed developer behind it.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1411  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 8:25 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by phesto View Post
OD - let's just say you're good at speculating...

Hmmm, maybe the proposal in question will be an interesting one when it is finally delivered to the public in a nice little package. The developer shouldn't have to look too far for a tenant...
So Amazon wants to expand across the street? Seems like a natural choice location for their second office downtown, as would 753 Seymour.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1412  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 8:37 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,724
Hmmm -
I was thinking Canada Post needed some downtown office space (despite having moved out of the Main Post Office), given they just opened a retail store in Austeville's 475 West Georgia (i.e. existing relationship).

But, you're probably right - as Amazon would be more apt to be in the market for the amount of space likely to trigger a new building.

Quote:
Originally Posted by csbvan View Post
...as would 753 Seymour.
Maybe Amazon in 3 buildings?

Wish they could be linked underground to Granville Station....
(can you get Henriquez out of the basement?)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1413  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 8:41 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by csbvan View Post
So Amazon wants to expand across the street? Seems like a natural choice location for their second office downtown, as would 753 Seymour.
Third office.

Second will be in the 401 expansion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1414  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 8:52 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Wish they could be linked underground to Granville Station....
I hear that (potential) ship sailed a long time ago.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1415  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 9:06 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Third office.

Second will be in the 401 expansion.
If Amazon is moving into this unannounced building, that would practically be a downtown Vancouver campus for them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1416  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 9:08 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Hmmm -
I was thinking Canada Post needed some downtown office space (despite having moved out of the Main Post Office), given they just opened a retail store in Austeville's 475 West Georgia (i.e. existing relationship).

But, you're probably right - as Amazon would be more apt to be in the market for the amount of space likely to trigger a new building.



Maybe Amazon in 3 buildings?

Wish they could be linked underground to Granville Station....
(can you get Henriquez out of the basement?)
I hadn't even thought about Canada Post. Another interesting possibility.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1417  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 9:27 PM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by csbvan View Post
I hadn't even thought about Canada Post. Another interesting possibility.
That was my guess. I'm still hoping for another redesign of the post office development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1418  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 9:37 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by csbvan View Post
If Amazon is moving into this unannounced building, that would practically be a downtown Vancouver campus for them.
I think that's the plan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1419  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 11:09 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
On the positive, it is gratifying to hear about more commercial office development in downtown, especially when it involves a significant commitment by a major player like Amazon. And a big thanks to all the hinters.

On the negative, the brutal and unforgiving tabletop that the city's extreme viewcone limitation is creating along West Georgia is going to become insufferable in the coming years. Telus Garden, the Public Library, the future Bay parkade redevelopment, the future Post Office redevelopment, the new Vancouver Art Gallery and accompanying office tower, and now this rumoured development on the Budget Rental site will all be neutered by city policy at exactly the same height: a dismal 90-metres or so, precisely where a dynamic corridor of skyscrapers could and would soar, but for the city's artificial prohibition.

I think the ridiculous and unnatural aesthetic result (along with the gross economic waste) might even be enough to make the less militant viewcone apologists see the error of this policy when its carried to its logical conclusion, which the current city council is intent on doing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1420  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 11:15 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,149
The city did identify W Georgia as a major corridor where buildings of significant architectural excellence can penetrate a view cone, so far no one has taken the plunge on that one though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:14 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.