HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11441  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2017, 9:38 PM
CareerShow CareerShow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 196
What routes may come to fruition now that Westjet has a new low cost carrier on route, and what current routes may be transferred?
     
     
  #11442  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2017, 9:54 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,022
speaking of the ferries

Island Ferry singled out for possible Nanaimo-Vancouver service - See more at: http://www.timescolonist.com/business/is...r-service-1.6550060#sthash.yi2PIXsn.dpuf

---

how much more no frills can westjet go? no magazine?
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #11443  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2017, 10:57 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
how much more no frills can westjet go? no magazine?
no tv, no wifi, check-in counter fee, carry-on luggage fee, no free drink, boarding pass printing fee, surcharge for additional baggage at airport, 29' or 28' pitch, etc...

they could also invent some new fees (washroom usage fee!?), or adventure into sub-28in seat pitch....
     
     
  #11444  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2017, 11:32 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
speaking of the ferries

Island Ferry singled out for possible Nanaimo-Vancouver service - See more at: http://www.timescolonist.com/business/is...r-service-1.6550060#sthash.yi2PIXsn.dpuf

---

how much more no frills can westjet go? no magazine?
no recline, no tray table, smaller pitch, seats without conforming headrest, ads on seat backs, no in flight entertainment (except maybe usb charging ports?), charge for carry-on in the overhead, rush seating
     
     
  #11445  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2017, 11:43 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
Are they going to start charging passengers for the shitty jokes their flight attendants tell?

I think in all honesty I'd pay them to stop.
     
     
  #11446  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2017, 1:42 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Are they going to start charging passengers for the shitty jokes their flight attendants tell?

I think in all honesty I'd pay them to stop.
They could create a dedicated YukYuk comedy cabin. Special cabin with access to poor jokes every 10 minutes during the flight. The only question is that will be a premium cabin or a deeply discounted cabin.
     
     
  #11447  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2017, 3:18 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Love to see someone attempt an autonomous flight with no pilot and flight attendants. Heck no checked luggage either. Walk on Walk off only. Doubt the authorities would allow it but the tech already exists and as a bonus no need to shuffle airliner employees around.
     
     
  #11448  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2017, 5:05 AM
mezzanine's Avatar
mezzanine mezzanine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,011
Although flying on a no-frills WJ flight seems like eating a shit sandwich, i can see this making sense in a strategic way - when facing the big choice for growing the company, instead of taking a major risk and going full-service alliance flying internationally and going head-to-head with AC, they are aiming for growth against shaky competitors and gives them leverage with their labour negotiations. and i suspect there is a large untapped market for ULCCs within canada.

Would they automatically base it out of YYC? to me it would seem that it would cannibalise WJ mainline ops...
     
     
  #11449  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2017, 6:41 AM
POCO POCO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by mezzanine View Post
Although flying on a no-frills WJ flight seems like eating a shit sandwich, i can see this making sense in a strategic way - when facing the big choice for growing the company, instead of taking a major risk and going full-service alliance flying internationally and going head-to-head with AC, they are aiming for growth against shaky competitors and gives them leverage with their labour negotiations. and i suspect there is a large untapped market for ULCCs within canada.

Would they automatically base it out of YYC? to me it would seem that it would cannibalise WJ mainline ops...

I can see them using their Calgary headquarters but being based at and flying primarily to smaller secondary airports where these upstarts ULCCs are likely to try to get a foot hold. A Hamilton hub with a focus city out West.

I would personally like an airline to use YOW as a hub as it's a lovely airport but Hamilton sits closer to Toronto and the States.

What does everyone think on potential names? Does it make sense to go with something totally different so as not to sully the WestJet brand? or will it just be "WestJet X" or something of the like?
     
     
  #11450  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2017, 7:18 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,022
how about "we're the cheap version of westjet so we won't tell you jokes air" or the "no jokes air" for short
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #11451  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2017, 12:00 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,596
With the launch of Encore, there was an open process where they took bids for crew bases.
     
     
  #11452  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2017, 5:44 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
no recline, no tray table, smaller pitch, seats without conforming headrest, ads on seat backs, no in flight entertainment (except maybe usb charging ports?), charge for carry-on in the overhead, rush seating
I would expect that they will have a purely WiFi-based bring-your-own-device in-flight entertainment system that is fee-based. I took a flight last summer to Frankfurt with Condor ($200 w/ tax one-way fare for the August long weekend booked one week before!!) and one had the choice of pre-purchasing access to the in-flight entertainment system (seatback) for something like $10 and onboard it was something like $25. Same thing for meals, pre-purchase for a discount and guarantee of the meal of your choice or on-board at a premium for whatever's left. Granted, it was a transatlantic flight, but I could see Westjet-ULCC going this path, especially if they one day offer transatlantic (U)LCC service a la Norwegian with some of Westjet's ordered 737-Max8 aircraft.

Longer-term, if this is a successful venture, I could see Westjet-ULCC leasing/buying some 788/9 or A358/9 to launch ULCC-long haul service to Europe and Asia, tying into Westjet/Encore and Westjet-ULCC domestic feeder network(s). I'm not sure if Westjet would want to cannibalize their transatlantic 767-based service, but perhaps they would chose their destinations accordingly, with premium destinations being served by mainline Westjet (LHR and others, in time) while lower-cost destinations being served by Westjet-ULCC (LGW, MAN, etc.)

Interesting times!
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
     
     
  #11453  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2017, 5:56 PM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Love to see someone attempt an autonomous flight with no pilot and flight attendants. Heck no checked luggage either. Walk on Walk off only. Doubt the authorities would allow it but the tech already exists and as a bonus no need to shuffle airliner employees around.
A autonomous flight would probably be safer. I have seen those May Day episodes. Most of them are pilot error and if only the pilot buggered off the plane would correct the issue and everyone would be alive instead.
     
     
  #11454  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2017, 5:58 PM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
no tv, no wifi, check-in counter fee, carry-on luggage fee, no free drink, boarding pass printing fee, surcharge for additional baggage at airport, 29' or 28' pitch, etc...

they could also invent some new fees (washroom usage fee!?), or adventure into sub-28in seat pitch....
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
no recline, no tray table, smaller pitch, seats without conforming headrest, ads on seat backs, no in flight entertainment (except maybe usb charging ports?), charge for carry-on in the overhead, rush seating

You forgot this one...

The Ryanair CEO last year said he wants standing room only flights (this proposal was shot down years earlier by regulators)...

This has a concept image.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/news/New-call-for-standing-seats-on-planes/
     
     
  #11455  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2017, 5:07 AM
YVR Bruce YVR Bruce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 79
Ws ulcc

It will be interesting to see whether the 10 x 738s are new to the combined fleet or to be drawn from the "mainline". With the latter, some leakage from YVR to XX to be expected, as happened at SFO during the early days of WN

Last edited by YVR Bruce; Apr 22, 2017 at 1:58 PM.
     
     
  #11456  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2017, 5:44 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by YVR Bruce View Post
It will be interesting to see whether the 10 x 738s are new to the combined fleet or to be drawn from the "mainline". With the latter, some leakage from YVR to XX to be expected, as happened at SFO during the early days of WN
Some of the rumors are the new generation of 737 will have proper business class seats to better compete against Air Canada in the premium market. If this happens (and that is a big if) more likely to be the older aircrafts.
     
     
  #11457  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2017, 7:00 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,076
Hmm... no service update in this thread anymore..?

Seems like Xiaman Air is thinking of what to do with the 3x weekly YVR-XMN... At one point, service was reduced to 2x weekly after Oct 24, but the 3rd weekly was added back later, starting Dec 12, but available for full fare only.

I'm wondering if they would re-allocate that weekly to somewhere (similar to moving 1 weekly from XMN-SZX-SEA to XMN-TAO-LAX to supplement their 4x weekly XMN-LAX service). Adding new 1x weekly route to claim the authority of a route seems to be a new trend there, as the available frequency from bilateral is being depleted...
     
     
  #11458  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 2:49 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
YvR seems to have added a new Trans border gate E88 . There does not seem to be any room after E87
     
     
  #11459  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 7:09 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
Hmm... no service update in this thread anymore..?
It's been awfully quiet on that front. My guess is a mix of summer schedules being more or less set and the effects of the end of expansion capacity to China.

Only news on airlineroute of late was a reduction to Brisbane, 787-9 down to an 787-8 for the peak winter season. Not a great sign for the route.

http://www.routesonline.com/news/38/airl...ada-w17-long-haul-changes-as-of-26apr17/

I have noticed KLM has been subbing in their 777-300 a lot over the last few weeks. It's most likely just an equipment utilization thing, but they sure do look great!




https://www.instagram.com/planelovers15/?hl=en
     
     
  #11460  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 7:45 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
It's been awfully quiet on that front. My guess is a mix of summer schedules being more or less set and the effects of the end of expansion capacity to China.

Only news on airlineroute of late was a reduction to Brisbane, 787-9 down to an 787-8 for the peak winter season. Not a great sign for the route.
Or Johnny is becoming inactive in the forum

Also there is the Air China change - YVR-PEK is now 1x daily 77WHD and 1x daily 333

wrt BNE - at least they it still maintains a daily service instead of dropping down to 3-4x weekly... or it could be a reduction to coincide with a MEL launch (I wonder if there will be any new route for W17.. if there are, announcement should be coming soon)
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.